Difference between revisions of "Evaluation of Portable Data for Imaging Extension with DVD and USB media"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Profile wiki page: Portable Data for Imaging == Technical Committee Evaluation (Preliminary answers) == Answers to the following checklist for PDI for DVD and USB option...")
 
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
* Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
 
* Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
  
Yes.
+
One recent CP-362 submitted and pending for completion. No design change, only clarification of a requirement.
  
 
* Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
 
* Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
Line 48: Line 48:
  
 
Yes.
 
Yes.
 +
** Portable Media Importer with DVD media option - Visus, Phillips, GE, RVC
 +
** Portable Media Creator with DVD media option - Supersonic, GE, Phillips, Visus, Samsung
 +
** Portable Media Importer with USB media option - Visus, Phillips, GE
 +
** Portable Media Creator with USB media option - Samsung, GE, Phillips, Visus
  
 
* Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
 
* Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
  
Yes.
+
Yes. See above
  
 
* Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
 
* Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
Line 59: Line 63:
 
* Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
 
* Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
  
No.
+
No special testing tools required. Testing can be covered by general purpose tool, export and import media.
  
 
* Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
 
* Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
Line 67: Line 71:
 
* (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
 
* (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
  
Yes.
+
Yes. We have seen DVD and USB used in hospital for media exchange. USB exchange is used in Australia. USB support in modality is popular.  
  
 
* Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
 
* Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
Line 75: Line 79:
 
* Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page [[Profiles|overview of the profile]]
 
* Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page [[Profiles|overview of the profile]]
  
Already exists [[Portable Data for Imaging]]
+
DVD and USB support have already included [[Portable Data for Imaging]]
  
 
* Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
 
* Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
 
* Record checklist findings and conclusions of the debate in your meeting minutes
 
* Record checklist findings and conclusions of the debate in your meeting minutes

Latest revision as of 10:43, 22 June 2016

Profile wiki page: Portable Data for Imaging

Technical Committee Evaluation (Preliminary answers)

Answers to the following checklist for PDI for DVD and USB options only

  • Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?

Yes.

See CP Tracking Spreadsheet

  • Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?

One recent CP-362 submitted and pending for completion. No design change, only clarification of a requirement.

  • Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?

Yes.

  • Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?

Yes.

  • Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?

Yes

Informal feedback gathering only

  • Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?

Yes.

  • Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
  • Record checklist findings and debate conclusion

Planning Committee Consensus (Preliminary answers)

  • Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?

Yes for DVD and USB options. Tested in Bochum 2016, Luxembourg 2015, NA 2015, Vienna 2014

Connectathon test results summary

  • Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?

Yes.

    • Portable Media Importer with DVD media option - Visus, Phillips, GE, RVC
    • Portable Media Creator with DVD media option - Supersonic, GE, Phillips, Visus, Samsung
    • Portable Media Importer with USB media option - Visus, Phillips, GE
    • Portable Media Creator with USB media option - Samsung, GE, Phillips, Visus
  • Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?

Yes. See above

  • Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?

DVD Media and USB Media only

  • Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?

No special testing tools required. Testing can be covered by general purpose tool, export and import media.

  • Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?

Yes. DVD and USB are widely used as storage media.

  • (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)

Yes. We have seen DVD and USB used in hospital for media exchange. USB exchange is used in Australia. USB support in modality is popular.

  • Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?

Yes.

DVD and USB support have already included Portable Data for Imaging

  • Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
  • Record checklist findings and conclusions of the debate in your meeting minutes