Difference between revisions of "DBT FT Evaluation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==Proposal== The Technical Committee, after a minimum of one annual cycle of Connectathon testing, decides that a Trial Implementation supplement is ready for consideration as...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Proposal== | ==Proposal== | ||
− | The | + | The Digital Breast Tomosynthesis profile has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Antje Schroeder) |
− | + | == Technical Committe Checklist "" | |
− | |||
* Run down the following checklist for each profile | * Run down the following checklist for each profile | ||
** Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"? | ** Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"? |
Revision as of 05:22, 4 May 2016
Proposal
The Digital Breast Tomosynthesis profile has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Antje Schroeder)
== Technical Committe Checklist ""
- Run down the following checklist for each profile
- Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
- Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
- Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
- Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
- Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
- Gather feedback from implementers via a formal questionnaire to Connectathon participants
- Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
- Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
- Record checklist findings and debate conclusion
Consensus
The Planning Committee votes on the Tech Cmte proposal to Final Text the supplement.
- Put Final Text Decision on the planning committee agenda
- Consider doing this a couple months before new TF version will be released so it can be incorporated.
- It's helpful to assign an advocate for the supplement at this time to check/prepare the evidence for the upcoming checklist rather than go hunting for it during the meeting
- Run down the following checklist for each proposed supplement
- Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
- Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
- Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
- Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
- Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
- Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
- (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
- Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
- Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page overview of the profile
- Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
- Record checklist findings and conclusions of the debate in your meeting minutes
- Hold and record formal vote
- Communicate results to TC