Difference between revisions of "PCCTech Minutes 2008 11 19"
Tsoutherland (talk | contribs) (New page: ====Pre-Hospital Care Report==== ====Clinical Decision Support w/IC Supplement==== ====OB Labor and Delivery Summary==== ====OB Postpartum Discharge Summary==== ====OB Postpartum Visit...) |
Tsoutherland (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====Pre-Hospital Care Report==== | ====Pre-Hospital Care Report==== | ||
+ | * Larry Williams requests to represent Todd Rothenhouse by proxy | ||
+ | ** co-chair response: we will have to check the governance and see if such a representation requires a written notice. | ||
+ | * Purpose of this profile is to develop an implementaion guide for exchange of data in ambulance/ems to hopsital workflow. | ||
+ | * Jim Kragh with Good Health Network can bring in ambulance folks to help PCC understand data | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Jean Millar: Have other states implemented ECON registries? | ||
+ | ○ Larry Williams: Yes | ||
+ | § Ohio | ||
+ | § Illinois | ||
+ | § Maryland is next - legislation not passed yet | ||
+ | § California - passed next of kin notificaiton | ||
+ | - Jean Millar: Is there sufficient time to ID victim? | ||
+ | ○ Larry Williams: ID is critical, HITSP identifies a process for this. Non-Treatment identification - this ensure EMS doesn't spend time id-ing victim when they should be treating patient | ||
+ | - Jean Millar: Have there been cases of mis-identification? | ||
+ | ○ Larry Williams: Prior to implementation of ECON system, yes, but not after implementation of ECON | ||
+ | - Thom Khun: Why are we creating a different document? Where is the form we are basing this on? | ||
+ | ○ Larry: 2 things there: | ||
+ | § Can get examples from existings reports | ||
+ | § HITSP ER use case defines an ambulance run report | ||
+ | ○ Keith: Yes there is something - National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) | ||
+ | ○ Larry: NEMSIS is a guidance document | ||
+ | ○ Larry: I can bring in a NEMSIS representative - Dr Craig Niers?? | ||
+ | ○ Jean: How do you handle unidentified patients? | ||
+ | |||
====Clinical Decision Support w/IC Supplement==== | ====Clinical Decision Support w/IC Supplement==== |
Revision as of 10:24, 19 November 2008
Pre-Hospital Care Report
- Larry Williams requests to represent Todd Rothenhouse by proxy
- co-chair response: we will have to check the governance and see if such a representation requires a written notice.
- Purpose of this profile is to develop an implementaion guide for exchange of data in ambulance/ems to hopsital workflow.
- Jim Kragh with Good Health Network can bring in ambulance folks to help PCC understand data
- Jean Millar: Have other states implemented ECON registries? ○ Larry Williams: Yes § Ohio § Illinois § Maryland is next - legislation not passed yet § California - passed next of kin notificaiton - Jean Millar: Is there sufficient time to ID victim? ○ Larry Williams: ID is critical, HITSP identifies a process for this. Non-Treatment identification - this ensure EMS doesn't spend time id-ing victim when they should be treating patient - Jean Millar: Have there been cases of mis-identification? ○ Larry Williams: Prior to implementation of ECON system, yes, but not after implementation of ECON - Thom Khun: Why are we creating a different document? Where is the form we are basing this on? ○ Larry: 2 things there: § Can get examples from existings reports § HITSP ER use case defines an ambulance run report ○ Keith: Yes there is something - National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) ○ Larry: NEMSIS is a guidance document ○ Larry: I can bring in a NEMSIS representative - Dr Craig Niers?? ○ Jean: How do you handle unidentified patients?