Difference between revisions of "Rad Tech Minutes 2021-04-12-16"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
:08:45 - 09:00: Welcome, [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1vqD1zQ_S4f7N3cxrRQMrP4Bbb0CXWts9Y61hOOgvCKw/edit?usp=sharing Patent Disclosure Announcement], Agenda Review | :08:45 - 09:00: Welcome, [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1vqD1zQ_S4f7N3cxrRQMrP4Bbb0CXWts9Y61hOOgvCKw/edit?usp=sharing Patent Disclosure Announcement], Agenda Review | ||
:S1: 09:00 - 10:00: Maintenance (7.25) | :S1: 09:00 - 10:00: Maintenance (7.25) | ||
− | :*CP-RAD-460 | + | :*CP-RAD-460-06 in the Assigned folder in google drive contains the updates based on today’s discussion. |
− | + | :**RAD Tech will resume work on this CP in the Actor Rqmts for the Event Repository, around line 100 in the document | |
+ | :**The next opportunity to discuss this will be at the next IHE RAD CP processing call on Thurs May 6, 10-11 CDT. | ||
:S1: 10:00 - 11:00: AI Whitepaper (8.75) | :S1: 10:00 - 11:00: AI Whitepaper (8.75) | ||
+ | :*Continued resolving comments. | ||
:S2: 11:15 - 13:15: AI Whitepaper (10.75) | :S2: 11:15 - 13:15: AI Whitepaper (10.75) | ||
+ | :*Continued resolving comments. | ||
:S3: 13:45 - 14:45: AI Whitepaper (11.75) | :S3: 13:45 - 14:45: AI Whitepaper (11.75) | ||
+ | :*Continued resolving comments. | ||
:S4: 16:00 - 17:00: Not TC Time. Available for Authoring Groups if needed | :S4: 16:00 - 17:00: Not TC Time. Available for Authoring Groups if needed | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 15:13, 15 April 2021
Monday, April 12, 2021: 8:15 - 3:45 pm Central Time (CT)
- IHE Radiology Technical Committee Roster
- 08:15 - 08:30: Welcome, Patent Disclosure Announcement, Agenda Review
- S1: 08:30 - 10:30: Contrast Administration Management (CAM) (2)
- Reviewed and completed 25 comments
- S2: 10:45 - 11:30: Maintenance (.75)
- Change Proposal Ballot Results
- Approved for Final Text
- CP-RAD-438
- CP-RAD 453
- CP-RAD-456
- CP-RAD-461
- Approved for Final Text
- Change Proposal Ballot Results
- S2: 11:30 - 13:15: AI Whitepaper (1.75)
- S3: 13:45 – 15:45 Maintenance (2.75)
Tuesday, April 13, 2021: 8:45 am - 1:15 pm CT
- IHE Radiology Technical Committee Roster
- 08:45 - 09:00: Welcome, Patent Disclosure Announcement, Agenda Review
- S1: 09:00 - 10:00am AI Whitepaper (2.75)
- Continued resolving comments
- S1: 10:00 - 11:00am Maintenance (3.75)
- New CP: CP-RAD-463: Add RDSR Display Option REM
- Determine how to package.
- Explore a mid-range process. KO may start a draft table comparing the CP path on one side, profile on the other and review
- Other notes added in the Rationale portion of the CP document
- CP-RAD-423: IOCM
- New CP: CP-RAD-463: Add RDSR Display Option REM
- S2: 11:15 - 13:15: AI Whitepaper (4.75)
- Continued resolving comments.
Wednesday, April 14, 2021: 8:15 am - 3:45 pm (CT)
- IHE Radiology Technical Committee Roster
- 08:15 - 08:30: Welcome, Patent Disclosure Announcement, Agenda Review
- S1: 08:30 - 10:30: Contrast Administration Management (CAM) (4)
- Continued resolving comments. Will finalize on Friday's session.
- S2: 10:45 - 11:15: Maintenance (4.25)
- Review IHE Radiology Domain Report to determine steps needed to complete.
- S2: 11:15 - 13:15: AI Whitepaper (6.75)
- Continued resolving comments. Will determine how many calls are needed to complete.
- S3: 13:45 - 15:45: Maintenance (6.25)
- This 640-08version contains updates to the XCA-I CP based on today’s discussion. There are two sentences highlighted in blue that I updated after the discussion, in particular, one to clarify that the local Imaging Doc Consumer can choose to retrieve directly from a local Img Doc Source rather than going through its IIG.
- We hope to call this ballot-ready on Friday. Pre-ballot tweaks are welcomed.
- CP-RAD-456: SOLE: update to enable ITI-20 FHIR semantics
- This CP (also in ‘Assigned' on Google Drive) contains updates based on today’s discussion, removing the options (Syslog or FHIR) for the Event Reporter and EventConsumer, and specifying the semantic choices in the Actor Requirements instead. We retain interoperability by mandating that the Event Repository support both Syslog and FHIR semantics
- This 640-08version contains updates to the XCA-I CP based on today’s discussion. There are two sentences highlighted in blue that I updated after the discussion, in particular, one to clarify that the local Imaging Doc Consumer can choose to retrieve directly from a local Img Doc Source rather than going through its IIG.
Thursday, April 15, 2021: 8:45 am - 2:45 pm CT
- IHE Radiology Technical Committee Roster
- 08:45 - 09:00: Welcome, Patent Disclosure Announcement, Agenda Review
- S1: 09:00 - 10:00: Maintenance (7.25)
- CP-RAD-460-06 in the Assigned folder in google drive contains the updates based on today’s discussion.
- RAD Tech will resume work on this CP in the Actor Rqmts for the Event Repository, around line 100 in the document
- The next opportunity to discuss this will be at the next IHE RAD CP processing call on Thurs May 6, 10-11 CDT.
- CP-RAD-460-06 in the Assigned folder in google drive contains the updates based on today’s discussion.
- S1: 10:00 - 11:00: AI Whitepaper (8.75)
- Continued resolving comments.
- S2: 11:15 - 13:15: AI Whitepaper (10.75)
- Continued resolving comments.
- S3: 13:45 - 14:45: AI Whitepaper (11.75)
- Continued resolving comments.
- S4: 16:00 - 17:00: Not TC Time. Available for Authoring Groups if needed
TI-Prep Closing Assessments
- CAM (Contrast Administration Managmeent)
- Did we line-by-line the entire document
- How ready is it to go out for TI: Completely, Almost, Soonish, Hmmm
- How did the work fit in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)
- Review the evaluation. Which complexity/uncertainty/effort points missed the mark?
- Or alternatively, estimate how many points you went over and assign the overage effort/complexity/uncertainty to the appropriate points.
- Are all the open issues closed?
- What significant debates in TI-prep were not anticipated in the Kickoff or PC-Prep
- Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose?
- What residual risks are worth noting
- Does it feel we've met all the use cases
- Did the promised resources manifest
- What vendors are engaged (for each actor)
- Who should specifically be targeted for TI notification (implementors & advocates)
- When will we have sample data/objects
- Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the TI meeting, if not what was the gap
- Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the TI meeting, if not what was the gap
- Do you need any tcons between now and TI Publication
- Did we line-by-line the entire document
- AIIiI-WP (AI Interoperability in Imaging Whitepaper)
- Did we line-by-line the entire document
- How ready is it to go out for TI: Completely, Almost, Soonish, Hmmm
- How did the work fit in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)
- Review the evaluation. Which complexity/uncertainty/effort points missed the mark?
- Or alternatively, estimate how many points you went over and assign the overage effort/complexity/uncertainty to the appropriate points.
- Are all the open issues closed?
- What significant debates in TI-prep were not anticipated in the Kickoff or PC-Prep
- Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose?
- What residual risks are worth noting
- Does it feel we've met all the use cases
- Did the promised resources manifest
- What vendors are engaged (for each actor)
- Who should specifically be targeted for TI notification (implementors & advocates)
- When will we have sample data/objects
- Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the TI meeting, if not what was the gap
- Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the TI meeting, if not what was the gap
- Do you need any tcons between now and TI Publication
- Did we line-by-line the entire document