Difference between revisions of "Rad Tech Minutes 2018-11-12 to 2018-11-15"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
:15:00-17:00: Import and Display of External Priors (7.5) | :15:00-17:00: Import and Display of External Priors (7.5) | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Wednesday, Nov 14, 2018: 8:15 am - 5:00 pm CST''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | :[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/198eCuMJcsMEWwtahidRLcMYzzIrte48CI7kuHbkpY-4/edit?usp=sharing IHE Radiology Technical Committee Roster] | ||
+ | :08:15-08:30: Breakfast, Welcome, [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1vqD1zQ_S4f7N3cxrRQMrP4Bbb0CXWts9Y61hOOgvCKw/edit?usp=sharing Patent Disclosure Announcement], Agenda Review | ||
+ | :08:30-10:30: Technical Framework Maintenance (2) - Focus on SWF.b CPs | ||
+ | :10:30-12:00: Encounter-based Imaging Workflow for Lightweight Devices (1.5) | ||
+ | :12:00-13:00: Lunch | ||
+ | :13:00-13:30: Scheduling and Maintenance | ||
+ | :13:30-15:00: Import and Display of External Priors (1.5) | ||
+ | :15:00-15:30: Encounter-based Imaging Workflow for Lightweight Devices (0.5) | ||
+ | :15:30- | ||
+ | :16:00-17:00: Group mtg with QRPH/ITI/PCC | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Thursday, Nov 15, 2018: 8.15 am - 3:00 pm CST''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | :[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/198eCuMJcsMEWwtahidRLcMYzzIrte48CI7kuHbkpY-4/edit?usp=sharing IHE Radiology Technical Committee Roster] | ||
+ | :08:15-08:30: Breakfast, Welcome, [https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1vqD1zQ_S4f7N3cxrRQMrP4Bbb0CXWts9Y61hOOgvCKw/edit?usp=sharing Patent Disclosure Announcement], Agenda Review | ||
+ | :08:30-11:00: Technical Framework Maintenance (2.5) - Finalize PDI / XDM CP for ballot | ||
+ | :11:00-12:00: Import and Display of External Priors (1) | ||
+ | :12:00-12:30: Lunch | ||
+ | :12:30-14:00: Closing Assessment (1.5) | ||
+ | : Closing evaluation: [[Profile_Development_Process_for_First_Timers#Annex:_Kickoff_Closing_Assessment]] | ||
+ | |||
Latest revision as of 13:27, 20 November 2018
Monday, Nov 12, 2018: 8:15 am - 5:00 pm CST Minutes
- IHE Radiology Technical Committee Roster
- 08:15-08:30: Breakfast, Welcome, Patent Disclosure Announcement, Agenda Review
- Attendees-in person
- Kinson Ho
- Wim Corbijn
- Antje Schroeder
- Jonathan Whitby
- Kevin O'Donnell
- Hamid Neshat
- Salt
- Eliot Silver
- Mauro Zanardini
- Chris Carr
- Nichole Knox
- Attendees-via WebEx
- Lynn Felhofer
- Dave Kwan
- Teri Sippel Schmidt
- Attendees-in person
- 08:30-10:30: Import and Display of External Priors (2)
- Open issues documented directly into document.
- 10:30-12:00: Encounter-based Imaging Workflow for Lightweight Devices (1.5)
- Open issues documented directly into document
- 12:00-13:00: Lunch
- 13:00-15:00: Technical Framework Maintenance - Identify CPs to focus on this week, CP Ballot Review (2)
- The 5 CPs from ballot to final text are CP-RAD-262, 320, 352, 400 and 405.
- The two new CPs reviewed are 411 (assigned) and 412 (rejected)
- 15:00-17:00: Import and Display of External Priors (4)
- Open issues documented directly into document
Tuesday, Nov 13, 2018: 8:15 am - 5:00 pm CST
- IHE Radiology Technical Committee Roster
- 08:15-08:30: Breakfast, Welcome, Patent Disclosure Announcement, Agenda Review
- Attendees-in person
- Kinson Ho
- Wim Corbijn
- Antje Schroeder
- Jonathan Whitby
- Kevin O'Donnell
- Hamid Neshat
- Salt
- Eliot Silver
- Nichole Knox
- Attendees-via WebEx
- Lynn Felhofer
- Dave Kwan
- Teri Sippel Schmidt
- Jason Nagels
- Hans Buitendijk
- Danield Rutz
- Tim Howe
- Michelle (from Cerner)
- Maddie Mailly
- Attendees-in person
- 08:30-10:30: Encounter-based Imaging Workflow for Lightweight Devices (3.5)
- Open issues documented directly into document
- 10:30-12:00: Import and Display of External Priors (5.5)
- Open issues documented directly into document
- 12:00-13:00: Lunch
- 13:00-15:00: Technical Framework Maintenance (4) - Review CDS-OAT updates with Hans
- Hans and Michelle will send updated version to group by end of this week
- Based on Lynn's updates, will schedule time for tech committee to review.
- Will need 1-2 more rounds of reviews
- Someone from Rad TC will need to prepare a CP with proper CP change syntax
- Rad TC will need another review to make sure CP is done correctly based on changes.
- CP will be ready for Public Comment
- Rad TC will review ballot comments, make necessary changes and incorporated in CDS-OAT Final Text.
- Vendors interested in implementing will be interested in ballot review to provide comments and make sure all technical details are there.
- Kinson and Wim will look at CP schedule to determine where to fit in.
- 15:00-17:00: Import and Display of External Priors (7.5)
Wednesday, Nov 14, 2018: 8:15 am - 5:00 pm CST
- IHE Radiology Technical Committee Roster
- 08:15-08:30: Breakfast, Welcome, Patent Disclosure Announcement, Agenda Review
- 08:30-10:30: Technical Framework Maintenance (2) - Focus on SWF.b CPs
- 10:30-12:00: Encounter-based Imaging Workflow for Lightweight Devices (1.5)
- 12:00-13:00: Lunch
- 13:00-13:30: Scheduling and Maintenance
- 13:30-15:00: Import and Display of External Priors (1.5)
- 15:00-15:30: Encounter-based Imaging Workflow for Lightweight Devices (0.5)
- 15:30-
- 16:00-17:00: Group mtg with QRPH/ITI/PCC
Thursday, Nov 15, 2018: 8.15 am - 3:00 pm CST
- IHE Radiology Technical Committee Roster
- 08:15-08:30: Breakfast, Welcome, Patent Disclosure Announcement, Agenda Review
- 08:30-11:00: Technical Framework Maintenance (2.5) - Finalize PDI / XDM CP for ballot
- 11:00-12:00: Import and Display of External Priors (1)
- 12:00-12:30: Lunch
- 12:30-14:00: Closing Assessment (1.5)
- Closing evaluation: Profile_Development_Process_for_First_Timers#Annex:_Kickoff_Closing_Assessment
Closing Assessment
Template: Profile_Development_Process_for_First_Timers#Annex:_Kickoff_Closing_Assessment
IDEP Assessment
- IDEP Profile: Import and Display of External Priors
- Describe gaps in Use Case coverage
- Not really. Two runs at the profile have resulted in good coverage.
- Is there a resolution plan for all the "uncertainty points" from the evaluation
- Added them all to the open issues and most/all have been closed or have an agreed plan for resolution coming into the PC meeting.
- Do the "effort points" still seem about right
- Mostly. Used a bit less than the allocated time, but also added a good list of TODOs.
- Describe unresolved technical issues/tasks
- There's a good list of todo items (see the todo section of the profile document) but technical issues have mostly been resolved with a plan forward and open issue for PC as necessary.
- Describe potential practical issues
- For the Report import use case, the expectations are a bit of a burden on sites with legacy infrastructure to make their report repository queryable but really there's no way to avoid it.
- Possible problems with access control for queries to external systems? C-FIND is mostly open or closed but sites might want more nuanced control?
- Does the open issue list feel complete
- Yes actually. Lurking suspicion that things are too quiet now, but can't think of any other critical issues.
- Which open issues feel most risky
- None are very risky. Kinson's simulation is probably the most risky but even that doesn't feel too bad.
- How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)
- About right, a bit of time to spare.
- How does the scope feel? (Room to expand? Just right? Pretty ambitious?)
- About right thanks to the work last cycle. It was tricky to get here, but this is the right place to be.
- If you had to reduce scope, what would you drop?
- XDS - it's optional and has some of the more complex bits.
- Have the promised resources manifested?
- Mostly yes.
- What tasks would benefit from additional expertise?
- Can't think of any. Maybe a bit of XDM deployment experience re viability of reqs.
- Are vendors engaged for key actors? How many?
- Image Manager - 3, ... nothing really new
- Importer - 3, ...
- Remote MHD Responder - 2, ...
- How many tcons would you like between now and the PC Prep Meeting?
- One (scheduled)
- Describe gaps in Use Case coverage
EBIW-II Assessment
- EBIW-II Profile: Encounter-Based Imaging Workflow for Lightweight Devices
- Describe gaps in Use Case coverage
- Feels pretty complete. Open issue asking for other devices that could/should be covered. (Surgical suite cameras?)
- Is there a resolution plan for all the "uncertainty points" from the evaluation
- Mostly yes. Need to assign homework to review SWF related profiles for possible CPing.
- Do the "effort points" still seem about right
- Slight increase with doing dual mechanism text writing (which was partly predicted), but otherwise seems right and a couple uncertainly/complexity were resolved simply.
- Describe unresolved technical issues/tasks
- Pretty much have an action plan for all the issues. Main would be the mappings for FHIR which will be worked up for PC.
- Addressing RAW/Lossless vs Lossy compressed storage. Also covered in Open Issue.
- Describe potential practical issues
- As with EBIW-I, the method for getting Patient/Encounter metadata is left to the Encounter Manager, they'll likely need to group with something and we list a variety of things they could effectively group with, but we deliberately did not mandate a baseline. Is this openness an issue?
- Does the open issue list feel complete
- Mostly yes.
- Which open issues feel most risky
- DICOMweb vs FHIR question.
- If we choose the FHIR route it will add complexity points to those transactions as we climb the learning curve.
- There are a number of topics in the Concepts section so if there a lot of comments that could eat up time.
- DICOMweb vs FHIR question.
- How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)
- About right. Time to spare this meeting, next meeting will likely be full.
- How does the scope feel? (Room to expand? Just right? Pretty ambitious?)
- Mostly right but the multi-mechanism is a bit of creep. Will focus on resolving in Jan.
- If you had to reduce scope, what would you drop?
- (Multi-mechanisms)
- Have the promised resources manifested?
- Missing the EBIW user protagonists on tcon - need to beat bushes for next meeting.
- What tasks would benefit from additional expertise?
- More FHIR expertise would help - Elliot and Jonathan have been contributing, but some resources and deeper details need calling external experts.
- Given that we are keeping RAW off the table, don't need RAW experts.
- Would be nice to get people (clinicians) specifically doing point of care photography. Get for PC review, and preferably also on tcon for the meeting.
- What vendors are engaged for each actor?
- Encounter Manager - 3, ...
- Lightweight Modality - 1, ... - try some outreach. At RSNA?
- Image Manager - 3, ...
- How many tcons would you like between now and the PC Prep Meeting?
- One (scheduled)
- Describe gaps in Use Case coverage