Difference between revisions of "ITI Agenda 2016-2017"
Mzanardini (talk | contribs) |
|||
(44 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
| rowspan="7" style="text-align: center" | [[#T1330 | mCSD]] | | rowspan="7" style="text-align: center" | [[#T1330 | mCSD]] | ||
| rowspan="7" style="text-align: center" | [[#W1330 | mCSD]] | | rowspan="7" style="text-align: center" | [[#W1330 | mCSD]] | ||
− | | rowspan="7" style="text-align: center" | [[#Th1330 | | + | | rowspan="7" style="text-align: center" | [[#Th1330 | Committee Operations]] |
| rowspan="7" style="text-align: center" | [[#F1330 | Framework Maintenance]] | | rowspan="7" style="text-align: center" | [[#F1330 | Framework Maintenance]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
| rowspan="5" style="text-align: center" | [[#T1530 | NPFS ]] | | rowspan="5" style="text-align: center" | [[#T1530 | NPFS ]] | ||
| rowspan="6" style="text-align: center" | [[#W1530 | Joint ITI/PCC/QRPH Session]] | | rowspan="6" style="text-align: center" | [[#W1530 | Joint ITI/PCC/QRPH Session]] | ||
− | | rowspan=" | + | | rowspan="3" style="text-align: center" | [[#Th1530 | Framework Maintenance]] |
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 3:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–4:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 3:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–4:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 4:15 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–4:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 4:15 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–4:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
+ | | rowspan="2" style="text-align: center" | [[#Th1615 | PDLS]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 4:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–4:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 4:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–4:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
Line 177: | Line 178: | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Elliot/Mauro | | style="text-align: center" | Elliot/Mauro | ||
| id="M0900" | Introductions and Agenda Review | | id="M0900" | Introductions and Agenda Review | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | '''Participants:''' John Moherke (By Light), Charles Parisot (GE), Alex Berler (IHE Services), Lapo Bertini (DEDALUS), Luke Duncan (IntraHealth), Elliot Silver (Change Healthcare), Mauro Zanardini (Arsenàl.IT), Sylvie Colas (ASIP), Gregorio Canal (Arsenàl.IT), Lynn Felhofer (IHE Tech Mgr), Jeremiah Meyers (IHE), Ben Leavy (Corepoint Health), Fabio Buti (DEDALUS, )Eric Heflin (THSA). Chris Melo (Siemens), Diana Anna (AHIMA), Daniel Berenzeanu (ReadyComputing), Joe Lamy (aegis) , Brian Reinhold (PCHA). |
+ | |||
+ | Introductions made by Elliot S. Goal of the week is to push out publish in Trial Implementation documents that received comments during PC. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Eric Heflin position as a Planning Co-chair is ending. '''CANDIDATEs ARE WELCOMED! If you are interested in running for this position contact the co-chairs or Jeremiah Myers (jmyers@himss.org)''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 9:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 9:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Charles/Fabio | | style="text-align: center" | Charles/Fabio | ||
| id="M0930" | PDLS | | id="M0930" | PDLS | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | Fabio and Charles produced a consolidated spreadsheet with comments received. We will primary address comments received on PDLS during this week and later we will provide some guidance to the PCC domain for the QEDm profile. |
+ | |||
+ | Fabio lead the discussion about comments received. Some comments about PDLS have been resolved. | ||
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–11:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–11:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | ||
Line 192: | Line 202: | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Luke | | style="text-align: center" | Luke | ||
| id="M1100" | mCSD | | id="M1100" | mCSD | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | Luke presented comments received on mCSD. There are no big issues pending about this profile. The main comments have been resolved during tcons in preparation to the f2f meeting. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 12:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–1:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 12:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–1:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
Line 202: | Line 212: | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Mauro/Gregorio | | style="text-align: center" | Mauro/Gregorio | ||
| id="M1330" | NPFS | | id="M1330" | NPFS | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | Gregorio lead the discussion. Main comments have been addressed. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 3:15 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–3:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 3:15 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–3:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
Line 221: | Line 231: | ||
| id="M1645" | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | | id="M1645" | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | ||
| style="text-align: left" | | | style="text-align: left" | | ||
+ | |||
+ | Assign homework: Elliot posted a powerpoint that can be used by Charles to describe the issue related to the provenance cardinality. Charles asked Elliot to draft some text in addition to diagrams produced. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Elliott will review PDLS. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Luke Duncan: will integrate comments of today. No homework assigned. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Gregorio: will integrate comments of today. No homework assigned. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Sylvie will review NPFS , Mauro will review mCSD , Ben will review PDLS , Alexander will review NPFS, Lynn will Prepare for Tuesday session and will start a review of PDLS and NPFS , Joe will make sure that mCSD is consistent with Argonaut profiling of FHIR resources and federated HPD proect in US. | ||
+ | |||
|} | |} | ||
Line 242: | Line 263: | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Charles/Fabio | | style="text-align: center" | Charles/Fabio | ||
| id="T0900" | PDLS | | id="T0900" | PDLS | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | '''Participants:''' John Moherke (By Light), Charles Parisot (GE), Alex Berler (IHE Services), Lapo Bertini (DEDALUS), Luke Duncan (IntraHealth), Elliot Silver (Change Healthcare), Mauro Zanardini (Arsenàl.IT), Sylvie Colas (ASIP), Gregorio Canal (Arsenàl.IT), Lynn Felhofer (IHE Tech Mgr), Jeremiah Meyers (IHE), Ben Leavy (Corepoint Health), Fabio Buti (DEDALUS, )Eric Heflin (THSA). Chris Melo (Siemens), Diana Anna (AHIMA), Daniel Berenzeanu (ReadyComputing), Joe Lamy (aegis) , Rob Horn (AGFA), Tarik (ICW). |
+ | |||
+ | Charles and Lapo lead this session that is focused on the definition of a new name for PDLS. O | ||
+ | bjectives are: | ||
+ | *tag it with the "m" that identifies profiles that are based on FHIR; | ||
+ | *tag it with "X" that identifies profiles that are related to Cross-Enterprise sharing. | ||
+ | The choice made by the cmte is mXDE: mobile cross-enetrprise Document Data-Elements extraction. | ||
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–11:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–11:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | ||
Line 252: | Line 280: | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Lynn | | style="text-align: center" | Lynn | ||
| id="T1100" | Framework Maintenance | | id="T1100" | Framework Maintenance | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | '''Doc Sharing, Vol 2 and 3 CPs''': |
*1060-00 - Need Null Flavor for FormatCode (John) - discussed and scoped this CP. Re-assigned to Elliott L who agreed to take a first crack at adding explanatory and guiding text to the formatCode section in Vol 3. | *1060-00 - Need Null Flavor for FormatCode (John) - discussed and scoped this CP. Re-assigned to Elliott L who agreed to take a first crack at adding explanatory and guiding text to the formatCode section in Vol 3. | ||
* 876-00 - Clarify Document Repository validation (Elliot & Bill) - discussed. Proposed changes verified against existing/updated text in ITI-41 and determined it can be cancelled. | * 876-00 - Clarify Document Repository validation (Elliot & Bill) - discussed. Proposed changes verified against existing/updated text in ITI-41 and determined it can be cancelled. | ||
Line 265: | Line 293: | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Luke | | style="text-align: center" | Luke | ||
| id="T1330" | mCSD | | id="T1330" | mCSD | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | Continuation of public comments review. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 3:15 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–3:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 3:15 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–3:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
Line 275: | Line 303: | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Mauro/Gregorio | | style="text-align: center" | Mauro/Gregorio | ||
| id="T1530" | NPFS | | id="T1530" | NPFS | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | Rob will draft a CP (during night) on DICOM in order to define audit messages for non-patient objects. We will point to this in NPFS. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 4:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–5:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 4:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–5:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Elliot/Mauro | | style="text-align: center" | Elliot/Mauro | ||
| id="T1645" | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | | id="T1645" | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | No homework assigned. |
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 286: | Line 316: | ||
| style="text-align: center" | | | style="text-align: center" | | ||
| id="T1700" | FHIR Task force | | id="T1700" | FHIR Task force | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | Elliot lead the discussion. The main goal of this discussion is to identify the role of the FHIR task force and identify a mechanism in order to make their job effective. Right now the role of the FHIR task force is to try to figure out how to coordinate the work between fhir and IHE. However things are proceeding very slowly. We should identify proposals on how to push all this stuff: define the deliverables of that task force, and define how to drive that group in reaching results. |
+ | |||
+ | The group highline the need for: | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Clear Deliverables , | ||
+ | *deadlines | ||
+ | *having a PM that follow those activities and is responsible for reaching goals in needed time. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The group does not need board approval , but just need the board support to completion of the task. | ||
+ | DCC can bring this to the Board. | ||
+ | |||
+ | It should not be the primary objective of the task force the building of a better interaction with HL7. We should reach more concrete tasks. List of tasks is not the primry need, The need is to restructure how those tasks can be accomplished. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The task force need a leader (typical role of a co-chair… but the amount of activities seems to be huge, and probably out of the voluntary time that people dedicate to IHE). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Work should be task execution oriented. We should be ready in one year from now if we want to be ready with a new profiling approach (below a first breakdown of tasks): | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1) Tool chosen by January | ||
+ | 2) Documentation ready by February f2f. | ||
+ | 3) Manage changes needed to the basic standard, bring issues from IHE to FHIR using a preferred channel. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Idea to have a Program Manager that can manage activities. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''ACTION ITEMS: taskforce members will check with their employers the availability support IHE as a Program Manager for the FHIR task force (more work than normal participation, and a formal responsability) , if no people will be available the Task Force will come back to RSNA/HIMMS in order to formarly request an help on this''' | ||
+ | |||
|} | |} | ||
Line 310: | Line 364: | ||
* IHE Europe has prepared a [ftp://IT_Infrastructure/iheitiyr15-2017-2018/Technical_Cmte/July%20F2F/IHE_ITI_XDS_Metadata_Guidelines_v1.0_A.docx white paper] on XDS meta data, and would like IHE International to publish it. | * IHE Europe has prepared a [ftp://IT_Infrastructure/iheitiyr15-2017-2018/Technical_Cmte/July%20F2F/IHE_ITI_XDS_Metadata_Guidelines_v1.0_A.docx white paper] on XDS meta data, and would like IHE International to publish it. | ||
* Review and decide on best approach (standalone whitepaper, update to existing document sharing whitepaper, integrate into TF, ...) | * Review and decide on best approach (standalone whitepaper, update to existing document sharing whitepaper, integrate into TF, ...) | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | '''Participants:''' John Moherke (By Light), Charles Parisot (GE), , Luke Duncan (IntraHealth), Elliot Silver (Change Healthcare), Mauro Zanardini (Arsenàl.IT), Sylvie Colas (ASIP), Gregorio Canal (Arsenàl.IT), Lynn Felhofer (IHE Tech Mgr), Jeremiah Meyers (IHE), Ben Leavy (Corepoint Health), Joe Lamy (aegis) , Rob Horn (AGFA), Tarik , Ken (Merge), KArima (IHE Europe), Bill (NIST) |
+ | |||
+ | Karima presents the work done by IHE Europe. The goal of the document was to share expertise from different European countires that have deployed XDS.b. After that the work-group tried to harmonize metadata management/definition in Europe and produce a guideline that can be used by new people. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The cmte suggested to submit this as a new work-item (some of the content could be reused at international level, some can be used to clarify the international specification via Change Proposals). What need to be formalized in the brief proposal: | ||
+ | |||
+ | *Purpose of the White Paper | ||
+ | *Audience and stakeholders | ||
+ | *Identify the mechanism of publication: WP + National extension? CPs? rtc.. | ||
+ | |||
+ | General interest of the ITI cmte has been declared for this as a new work-item. It will be evaluated as other proposals. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The Tech Cmte has no negative opinion in publishing this as it is in IHE EUROPE while ITI tech is working on it. | ||
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 9:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 9:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Lynn | | style="text-align: center" | Lynn | ||
| id="W0930" | Framework Maintenance | | id="W0930" | Framework Maintenance | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | '''Doc Sharing, Vol 3 CPs''' | + | | style="text-align: left" | '''Doc Sharing, Vol 3 CPs''': |
− | * | + | * 917-00 - Clarify use of Coding Scheme in metadata - discussed and updated. CP title was updated to reflect current scope of the change. Version -01 is Completed and ready for future ballot 44 |
− | + | * 925-02 - Clarify UTC offset within DTM datatype - extensively discussed. Resolution: CP is Cancelled because this would be a breaking change for many/most Document Consumers. Lynn will followup with Nader. | |
− | * 925-02 - Clarify UTC offset within DTM datatype - | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–11:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–11:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | ||
Line 334: | Line 394: | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Mauro/Gregorio | | style="text-align: center" | Mauro/Gregorio | ||
| id="W1100" | NPFS | | id="W1100" | NPFS | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | Gregorio lead the discussion. The last comments have been resolved. NPSFm will be ready for a final review tonight. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 12:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–1:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 12:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–1:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
Line 344: | Line 404: | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Luke | | style="text-align: center" | Luke | ||
| id="W1330" | mCSD | | id="W1330" | mCSD | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | Luke lead the discussion. The last comments have been resolved. |
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 3:15 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–3:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 3:15 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–3:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
Line 354: | Line 414: | ||
| style="text-align: center" | TBD | | style="text-align: center" | TBD | ||
| id="W1530" | Joint ITI/PCC/QRPH Session | | id="W1530" | Joint ITI/PCC/QRPH Session | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | [http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Joint_meeting_agenda%27s_and_minutes_with_ITI,_PCC_and_QRPH#Attendance Minute of Joint Meeting] |
|} | |} | ||
Line 376: | Line 436: | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Mauro/Gregorio | | style="text-align: center" | Mauro/Gregorio | ||
| id="Th0900" | NPFS | | id="Th0900" | NPFS | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | '''Participants:''' John Moherke (By Light) , Luke Duncan (mCSD) , Ben Levy (CorepointHealth) , Elliot Silver (Change Healthcare) , Mauro Zanardini (Arsenàl.IT) , Sylvie Colas (ASIP) , Gregorio Canal (Arsenàl.IT) , Rob Horn (AGFA), Lynn Felhofer (ITI Tech Manager) , Joe Lemy (AEGIS), Chris melo (Philips) , Gila Pike (Cogna) , Amit Popat (EPIC). |
+ | |||
+ | Gregorio lead the discussion. Comments made by Lynn are reviewed. A final version ready for VOTE will be published tonight. | ||
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 9:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 9:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | ||
| style="text-align: center" | John | | style="text-align: center" | John | ||
| id="Th0945" | FHIR Profiling | | id="Th0945" | FHIR Profiling | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | FHIR profiling: discussion about the opportunity to start with NPFSm to draft a structured definition and put it on the ftp. Rob will set up the ftp in order to manage structured definition produced with forge. |
+ | |||
+ | '''ACTION ITEM: Gregorio will try to develop a structured definition using Forge''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''ACTION ITEM: Rob will set up the ftp in order to become the location for structured definition''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–11:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–11:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | ||
Line 392: | Line 459: | ||
| id="Th1100" | PDLS (Joint with PCC) | | id="Th1100" | PDLS (Joint with PCC) | ||
| style="text-align: left" | | | style="text-align: left" | | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2 comments pending: cardinality for provencnace and security section needs to be improved. Charles and Fabio will work on those two tonight. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Charles is confortable with discuss we had, he can have a version ready for a final review tomorrow. | ||
+ | |||
+ | QEDm is due to Mary before August 7th. And mXDE should be sent to Mary by Monday. | ||
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 12:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–1:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 12:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–1:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
Line 399: | Line 473: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 1:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–3:15 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 1:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–3:15 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
| style="text-align: center" | Elliot/Mauro | | style="text-align: center" | Elliot/Mauro | ||
− | | id=" | + | | id="Th1330" | Committee Operations |
* Wiki updates | * Wiki updates | ||
* Feedback on the early publication schedule | * Feedback on the early publication schedule | ||
Line 422: | Line 486: | ||
* Improving quality/amount of review | * Improving quality/amount of review | ||
* Improving Cybersecurity awareness | * Improving Cybersecurity awareness | ||
+ | * FHIR STU4 update plan | ||
| style="text-align: left" | | | style="text-align: left" | | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * New publication cycle: document went out early, cmte feedback are good. Elliot: probably the next year we should review CP integrated in a divide and conquer manner (split activities between Lynn Mauro and Elliot. This year we spent a huge amount of time reviewing the same things). For Mary was a good choice, and that is one ofm our initial goals. We avoided August work on those stuff. '''We need to ask at the end of CAT cycle if the bigger list of CPs approved but not integrate is an issue.''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Another good point is to not having a queue of publication stuff competing with other domains. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''DECISION: We will proceed with this cycle. ''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * FHIR based profiles: we are missing work-item that does not need 12 months cycle. Is there a new status of document , for things that are not published as a standard (e.g. first version of implementation guideline)? The intent should be to have a Quick process to publish something that can be implemented. It is a work-item , a document in ihe.net , could be TI , but maybe a different status. '''Green Paper''' ? Another problem can be having a single entry point for new work-items (people cannot wait 12-18 months for a guideline...) and probably Green Papers does not need a formal public comment period. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Review IHE ITI cycle: to fulfill the need above , to engage more people and to have more f2f time to work on technical stuff, we should modify our cycle: different entry points in different stages. We could try to work on two entry point and 6 months cycles. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Opening every 6 months , 4 tech meetings. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''ACTION ITEM: Elliot will draft a couple of proposal in order to restructure the IHE cycle. 2 entry point in one year cycle and a second proposal. Elliot will prepare a document to describe a proposal and share it with ITI tech and sponsors''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Value added by proposals: We should try to attract more ambitious profile proposals that could really add value to our offer. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * tool in order to simplify the technical specification management: JIRA CP tracking / ATNA Gazelle. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Improvemnent using technology: ATNA, requirements are translated in schematron checks by KAreval team. And ATNA seems to be good starting point to leave PDF spec in favor of a structured definition. A sparate GSS server will be installed on ihe servers, that can be used to enter the requirement definition. | ||
+ | |||
+ | JIRA could be used to track the CP management process. There are some governance stuff missing: provisioning of the service – backup , copy of the file, ecc… Same governance issue. Lynn Is waiting for the tool ready from Eric. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Lynn want use structured definition for ATNA as a pilot (starting form the next cycle). After that , we will need to discuss with IHE international for the governance. Check-in again at the planning f2f. '''ACTION ITEM: Lynn will make sure to have the list of governance issue ready. ''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Cybersicurity: awareness raising. Confidentiliaty integrity availability. Rob suggest to make things we do more visible. Attend conferences about cyber security. This affected the perception. Opportunity for cybercicurity WP , webex , use the word cybercicuirty on our website. | ||
+ | GAP: there is a technical gap that we should try to fix: what software your product include. Some interoperable format to publish this libraries. What else can do ITI ? thinking what profiles / infrastructure , can be valuable for integrity and availability. Robustness. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * From next cycle we will try to have a weekly meeting to discuss work-items and topics. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Try to use slack for IHE ITI in order to coordinate better activities. Or a skype channel. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center" | 3:15 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–3:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center" | — | ||
+ | | id="Th1515" | Afternoon Break | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center" | — | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center" | 3:30 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–4:15 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center" | Lynn | ||
+ | | id="Th1530" | Framework Maintenance | ||
+ | | style="text-align: left" | | ||
+ | '''Security CPs''' in the [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/1_Assigned/ Assigned CPs directory]: | ||
+ | *1013-01 - Clarify UDP requirements in ITI-20 - discussed and decided to Cancel (sorry Gila) | ||
+ | * 920-02 - Restore IHE Extensions in ITI-20 - discussed and decided to restore the Extensions table; remains Assigned to Rob for further work | ||
+ | '''Editorial CPs'''- | ||
+ | * 1049-00 - Distinction between PIX vs PDQ should be made more clear - heavy committee editing to explain the difference between PIX & PDQ. Still needs work to explain XCPD difference from PDQv3, and to find a home for this text (perhaps an appendix to avoid duplicating in Vol 1 for all flavors of these profiles. Remains assigned to Ben. Lynn will assist. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center" | 4:15 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–4:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
+ | | style="text-align: center" | Charles/Fabio | ||
+ | | id="Th1645" | PDLS | ||
+ | | style="text-align: left" | Final comments reviewed. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 4:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–5:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 4:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font>–5:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
Line 450: | Line 568: | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Luke | | style="text-align: center" | Luke | ||
| id="F0900" | mCSD | | id="F0900" | mCSD | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | Participants: Mauro Zanardini (Arsenàl.IT), Gregorio Canal (Arsenàl.IT), Rob Horn (AGFA), Elliot Silver (Change Healthcare) , Luke Duncan (IntraHealth) , John Moherke (By Light), Charles Parisot (GE), Joe Lamy (aegis), Chris Melo (PHILIPS) |
+ | |||
+ | '''MOTION: John move the motion to approve mCSD to TI, Chris seconded it. Joe abstains. MOTION APPROVED''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 10:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 10:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | ||
Line 456: | Line 578: | ||
| id="F1000" | NPFS | | id="F1000" | NPFS | ||
| style="text-align: left" | | | style="text-align: left" | | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''MOTION: John move the motion to approve NPFSm to TI, Rob Seconded it, Joe abstains. MOTION APPROVED''' | ||
+ | |||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–11:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 10:45 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font>–11:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">am</font> | ||
Line 480: | Line 606: | ||
| style="text-align: center" | Lynn | | style="text-align: center" | Lynn | ||
| id="F1330" | Framework Maintenance | | id="F1330" | Framework Maintenance | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | |
+ | <b><u>Planning for FHIR “Release 4” updates in 2017-18:</u></b> | ||
+ | * John recommends waiting to update our documents until Release 4 ballot comments are resolved. That means that Release 4-related changes will not affect ITI documents before that. | ||
+ | * We will have a strong indication of timing for Release 4 in spring 2018. | ||
+ | * We discussed submitting a work item that would represent committee work to evaluate changes in Release 4 and its impact on our profiles, submit comments on the Release 4 ballot on behalf of IHE ITI, and to update the supplements with the time is right. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b><u>Last year, we had more CPs that needed a lot of rework after ballot:</u></b> | ||
+ | * There is not enough review prior to ballot | ||
+ | * Perhaps too much effort on specificity vs remaining silent | ||
+ | * Look for opportunities to suggest that a small subset take a time-consuming or editorial problem offline and come back to the group with an updated change. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b><u>Gateway questions prior to accepting a CP (or finishing work on an existing CP):</u></b> | ||
+ | * Is solving the problem necessary for interoperability? | ||
+ | * Has an implementer reported this problem, or should they, or is this theoretical? | ||
+ | * Is the text inconsistent? If so, are we over-specifying, i.e. can we delete the inconsistency? | ||
+ | * Strongly suggest that a submitter propose a solution. | ||
+ | * Is this a problem that needs to be fixed? | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b><u>Other ideas/opportunities:</u></b> | ||
+ | * Continuous integration of CPs within the ITI TC (Lynn to write a strawman process) | ||
+ | * Opportunities for quarterly publication or post-ballot publication. Affects Mary so Lynn will discuss with her | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b><u>Update to the supplement template: </u> </b>(Lynn has passed on to Mary & doc group) | ||
+ | * Guidance on using styles. An example of each and when/how to use it. | ||
+ | * Other documentation conventions (e.g. Actor, Transaction, …grouping , etc…) | ||
+ | * Include guidelines on use of normative words (link) https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/keyword-guidelines#tc-spec-keywords | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align: center" | 3:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | | style="text-align: center" | 3:00 <font style="font-variant: small-caps">pm</font> | ||
Line 780: | Line 931: | ||
(Note: 1 co-chair to concurrent DCC session) | (Note: 1 co-chair to concurrent DCC session) | ||
− | | style="text-align: left" | | + | | style="text-align: left" | '''Participants:''' |
− | |||
− | '''Participants:''' | ||
Fabio Buti: DEDALUS | Fabio Buti: DEDALUS | ||
Line 967: | Line 1,116: | ||
'''PARTICIPANTS''' : | '''PARTICIPANTS''' : | ||
− | + | * Jeremiah Myers (IHE) | |
− | Jeremiah Myers (IHE) | + | * Holly Miller (MedAllies) |
− | + | * Joe Lamy (AEGIS/SSA) | |
− | + | * Luke Duncan (IntraHealth) | |
− | Holly Miller (MedAllies) | + | * Ken Meyer (Merge/IBM) |
− | + | * Elliot Silver (Change Healthcare) | |
− | + | * Mauro Zanardini (Arsenal.IT) | |
− | Joe Lamy (AEGIS/SSA) | + | * Ben Levy (Corepoint) |
− | + | * Steve Moore (Washington University) | |
− | + | * Chris Melo (Philips) | |
− | Luke Duncan (IntraHealth) | + | * Tone Southerland (Ready Computing) |
− | + | * Nader Cheaib (Asip Sante) | |
− | + | * Nemanja Milenrovic (Asip Sante) | |
− | Ken Meyer (Merge/IBM) | + | * Amit Popat (Epic) |
− | + | * John Stamm (Epic) | |
− | + | * Nichole Drye-Mayo (RSNA) | |
− | Elliot Silver (Change Healthcare) | + | * Celina Roth (HIMSS) |
− | + | * Derek Ritz (ecGroup) | |
− | + | * Denise Downing (AORN) | |
− | Mauro Zanardini (Arsenal.IT) | + | * Emma Jones (Allscripts) |
− | + | * Pegeen Long (Allscripts) | |
− | + | * Thomson Kuhn (ACP) | |
− | Ben Levy (Corepoint) | + | * Charles Perisot (GE) |
− | + | * Fabio Buti (Dedalus) | |
− | + | * John Moehrke (By Light) | |
− | Steve Moore (Washington University) | + | * George Cole (Allscripts) |
− | + | * Didi Davis (Sequia Project) | |
− | + | * Gila Pyke (Cognaissance) | |
− | Chris Melo (Philips) | + | * Laura Bright (Ready Computing) |
− | + | * Chris Carr (RSNA) | |
− | + | * Daniel Berezeanu (Ready Computing) | |
− | Tone Southerland (Ready Computing) | + | * Eric Heflin (THSA) |
− | |||
− | |||
− | Nader Cheaib (Asip Sante) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Nemanja Milenrovic (Asip Sante) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Amit Popat (Epic) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | John Stamm (Epic) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Nichole Drye-Mayo (RSNA) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Celina Roth (HIMSS) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Derek Ritz (ecGroup) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Denise Downing (AORN) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Emma Jones (Allscripts) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Pegeen Long (Allscripts) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Thomson Kuhn (ACP) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Charles Perisot (GE) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Fabio Buti (Dedalus) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | John Moehrke (By Light) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | George Cole (Allscripts) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Didi Davis (Sequia Project) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Gila Pyke (Cognaissance) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Laura Bright (Ready Computing) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Chris Carr (RSNA) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Daniel Berezeanu (Ready Computing) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | Eric Heflin (THSA) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:30, 26 July 2017
July 2017 F2F – Public Comment Review Meeting, 17–21 July 2017
This 5-day meeting is focused on a finalizing public comment resolution of work items.
- Meeting Location
- RSNA Building, Oak Brook, IL
WebEx/T-Con information
WebEx information for this meeting is:
- Meeting Number: 927 055 967
- Password: Ask Jeremiah Myers (jmyers@himss.org)
- Link: Webex
Agenda and Minutes
All times listed are tentative, and may be revised during the meeting—refresh often.
Time
Oak Brook, IL (CDT, UTC−05:00) |
Monday, 17 July | Tuesday, 18 July | Wednesday, 19 July | Thursday, 20 July | Friday, 21 July |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
8:30 am–8:45 am | Breakfast | Breakfast | Breakfast | Breakfast | Breakfast |
8:45 am–9:00 am | |||||
9:00 am–9:15 am | Introductions and Agenda Review | PDLS | IHE Europe White Paper | NPFS | mCSD |
9:15 am–9:30 am | |||||
9:30 am–9:45 am | PDLS | Framework Maintenance | |||
9:45 am–10:00 am | FHIR Profiling | ||||
10:00 am–10:15 am | NPFS | ||||
10:15 am–10:30 am | |||||
10:30 am–10:45 am | |||||
10:45 am–11:00 am | Morning Break | Morning Break | Morning Break | Morning Break | Morning Break |
11:00 am–11:15 am | mCSD | Framework Maintenance | NPFS | PDLS | PDLS |
11:15 am–11:30 am | |||||
11:30 am–11:45 pm | |||||
11:45 pm–noon | |||||
noon–12:15 pm | TI Publication Decision | ||||
12:15 pm–12:30 pm | |||||
12:30 pm–12:45 pm | Lunch | Lunch | Lunch | Lunch | Lunch |
12:45 pm–1:00 pm | |||||
1:00 pm–1:15 pm | |||||
1:15 pm–1:30 pm | |||||
1:30 pm–1:45 pm | NPFS | mCSD | mCSD | Committee Operations | Framework Maintenance |
1:45 pm–2:00 pm | |||||
2:00 pm–2:15 pm | |||||
2:15 pm–2:30 pm | |||||
2:30 pm–2:45 pm | |||||
2:45 pm–3:00 pm | |||||
3:00 pm–3:15 pm | |||||
3:15 pm–3:30 pm | Afternoon Break | Afternoon Break | Afternoon Break | Afternoon Break | |
3:30 pm–3:45 pm | Framework Maintenance | NPFS | Joint ITI/PCC/QRPH Session | Framework Maintenance | |
3:45 pm–4:00 pm | |||||
4:00 pm–4:15 pm | |||||
4:15 pm–4:30 pm | PDLS | ||||
4:30 pm–4:45 pm | |||||
4:45 pm–5:00 pm | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | ||
5:00 pm–5:15 pm | FHIR Task Force
(optional) |
||||
5:15 pm–5:30 pm | |||||
5:30 pm–5:45 pm | |||||
5:45 pm–6:00 pm |
Monday, 17 July, 2017
Time
Oak Brook (CDT, UTC−05:00) |
Leads | Activity | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
8:30 am–9:00 am | — | Breakfast | — |
9:00 am–9:30 am | Elliot/Mauro | Introductions and Agenda Review | Participants: John Moherke (By Light), Charles Parisot (GE), Alex Berler (IHE Services), Lapo Bertini (DEDALUS), Luke Duncan (IntraHealth), Elliot Silver (Change Healthcare), Mauro Zanardini (Arsenàl.IT), Sylvie Colas (ASIP), Gregorio Canal (Arsenàl.IT), Lynn Felhofer (IHE Tech Mgr), Jeremiah Meyers (IHE), Ben Leavy (Corepoint Health), Fabio Buti (DEDALUS, )Eric Heflin (THSA). Chris Melo (Siemens), Diana Anna (AHIMA), Daniel Berenzeanu (ReadyComputing), Joe Lamy (aegis) , Brian Reinhold (PCHA).
Introductions made by Elliot S. Goal of the week is to push out publish in Trial Implementation documents that received comments during PC. Eric Heflin position as a Planning Co-chair is ending. CANDIDATEs ARE WELCOMED! If you are interested in running for this position contact the co-chairs or Jeremiah Myers (jmyers@himss.org)
|
9:30 am–10:45 am | Charles/Fabio | PDLS | Fabio and Charles produced a consolidated spreadsheet with comments received. We will primary address comments received on PDLS during this week and later we will provide some guidance to the PCC domain for the QEDm profile.
Fabio lead the discussion about comments received. Some comments about PDLS have been resolved. |
10:45 am–11:00 am | — | Morning Break | — |
11:00 am–12:30 am | Luke | mCSD | Luke presented comments received on mCSD. There are no big issues pending about this profile. The main comments have been resolved during tcons in preparation to the f2f meeting. |
12:30 am–1:30 pm | — | Lunch | — |
1:30 pm–3:15 pm | Mauro/Gregorio | NPFS | Gregorio lead the discussion. Main comments have been addressed. |
3:15 pm–3:30 pm | — | Afternoon Break | — |
3:30 pm–4:45 pm | Lynn | Framework Maintenance | See maintenance-specific topics & notes here
|
4:45 pm–5:00 pm | Elliot/Mauro | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates |
Assign homework: Elliot posted a powerpoint that can be used by Charles to describe the issue related to the provenance cardinality. Charles asked Elliot to draft some text in addition to diagrams produced. Elliott will review PDLS. Luke Duncan: will integrate comments of today. No homework assigned. Gregorio: will integrate comments of today. No homework assigned. Sylvie will review NPFS , Mauro will review mCSD , Ben will review PDLS , Alexander will review NPFS, Lynn will Prepare for Tuesday session and will start a review of PDLS and NPFS , Joe will make sure that mCSD is consistent with Argonaut profiling of FHIR resources and federated HPD proect in US. |
Tuesday, 18 July, 2017
Time
Oak Brook (CDT, UTC−05:00) |
Leads | Activity | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
8:30 am–9:00 am | — | Breakfast | — |
9:00 am–10:45 am | Charles/Fabio | PDLS | Participants: John Moherke (By Light), Charles Parisot (GE), Alex Berler (IHE Services), Lapo Bertini (DEDALUS), Luke Duncan (IntraHealth), Elliot Silver (Change Healthcare), Mauro Zanardini (Arsenàl.IT), Sylvie Colas (ASIP), Gregorio Canal (Arsenàl.IT), Lynn Felhofer (IHE Tech Mgr), Jeremiah Meyers (IHE), Ben Leavy (Corepoint Health), Fabio Buti (DEDALUS, )Eric Heflin (THSA). Chris Melo (Siemens), Diana Anna (AHIMA), Daniel Berenzeanu (ReadyComputing), Joe Lamy (aegis) , Rob Horn (AGFA), Tarik (ICW).
Charles and Lapo lead this session that is focused on the definition of a new name for PDLS. O bjectives are:
The choice made by the cmte is mXDE: mobile cross-enetrprise Document Data-Elements extraction. |
10:45 am–11:00 am | — | Morning Break | — |
11:00 am–12:30 am | Lynn | Framework Maintenance | Doc Sharing, Vol 2 and 3 CPs:
|
12:30 am–1:30 pm | — | Lunch | — |
1:30 pm–3:15 pm | Luke | mCSD | Continuation of public comments review. |
3:15 pm–3:30 pm | — | Afternoon Break | — |
3:30 pm–4:45 pm | Mauro/Gregorio | NPFS | Rob will draft a CP (during night) on DICOM in order to define audit messages for non-patient objects. We will point to this in NPFS.
|
4:45 pm–5:00 pm | Elliot/Mauro | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | No homework assigned. |
5:10 pm–6:00 pm | FHIR Task force | Elliot lead the discussion. The main goal of this discussion is to identify the role of the FHIR task force and identify a mechanism in order to make their job effective. Right now the role of the FHIR task force is to try to figure out how to coordinate the work between fhir and IHE. However things are proceeding very slowly. We should identify proposals on how to push all this stuff: define the deliverables of that task force, and define how to drive that group in reaching results.
The group highline the need for:
The group does not need board approval , but just need the board support to completion of the task. DCC can bring this to the Board. It should not be the primary objective of the task force the building of a better interaction with HL7. We should reach more concrete tasks. List of tasks is not the primry need, The need is to restructure how those tasks can be accomplished. The task force need a leader (typical role of a co-chair… but the amount of activities seems to be huge, and probably out of the voluntary time that people dedicate to IHE). Work should be task execution oriented. We should be ready in one year from now if we want to be ready with a new profiling approach (below a first breakdown of tasks): 1) Tool chosen by January 2) Documentation ready by February f2f. 3) Manage changes needed to the basic standard, bring issues from IHE to FHIR using a preferred channel. Idea to have a Program Manager that can manage activities. ACTION ITEMS: taskforce members will check with their employers the availability support IHE as a Program Manager for the FHIR task force (more work than normal participation, and a formal responsability) , if no people will be available the Task Force will come back to RSNA/HIMMS in order to formarly request an help on this |
Wednesday, 19 July, 2017
Time
Oak Brook (CDT, UTC−05:00) |
Leads | Activity | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
8:30 am–9:00 am | — | Breakfast | — |
9:00 am–9:30 am | Karima/Charles | IHE Europe White Paper
|
Participants: John Moherke (By Light), Charles Parisot (GE), , Luke Duncan (IntraHealth), Elliot Silver (Change Healthcare), Mauro Zanardini (Arsenàl.IT), Sylvie Colas (ASIP), Gregorio Canal (Arsenàl.IT), Lynn Felhofer (IHE Tech Mgr), Jeremiah Meyers (IHE), Ben Leavy (Corepoint Health), Joe Lamy (aegis) , Rob Horn (AGFA), Tarik , Ken (Merge), KArima (IHE Europe), Bill (NIST)
Karima presents the work done by IHE Europe. The goal of the document was to share expertise from different European countires that have deployed XDS.b. After that the work-group tried to harmonize metadata management/definition in Europe and produce a guideline that can be used by new people. The cmte suggested to submit this as a new work-item (some of the content could be reused at international level, some can be used to clarify the international specification via Change Proposals). What need to be formalized in the brief proposal:
General interest of the ITI cmte has been declared for this as a new work-item. It will be evaluated as other proposals. The Tech Cmte has no negative opinion in publishing this as it is in IHE EUROPE while ITI tech is working on it. |
9:30 am–10:45 am | Lynn | Framework Maintenance | Doc Sharing, Vol 3 CPs:
|
10:45 am–11:00 am | — | Morning Break | — |
11:00 am–12:30 am | Mauro/Gregorio | NPFS | Gregorio lead the discussion. The last comments have been resolved. NPSFm will be ready for a final review tonight. |
12:30 am–1:30 pm | — | Lunch | — |
1:30 pm–3:15 pm | Luke | mCSD | Luke lead the discussion. The last comments have been resolved. |
3:15 pm–3:30 pm | — | Afternoon Break | — |
3:30 pm–5:00 pm | TBD | Joint ITI/PCC/QRPH Session | Minute of Joint Meeting |
Thursday, 20 July, 2017
Time
Oak Brook (CDT, UTC−05:00) |
Leads | Activity | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
8:30 am–9:00 am | — | Breakfast | — |
9:00 am–9:45 am | Mauro/Gregorio | NPFS | Participants: John Moherke (By Light) , Luke Duncan (mCSD) , Ben Levy (CorepointHealth) , Elliot Silver (Change Healthcare) , Mauro Zanardini (Arsenàl.IT) , Sylvie Colas (ASIP) , Gregorio Canal (Arsenàl.IT) , Rob Horn (AGFA), Lynn Felhofer (ITI Tech Manager) , Joe Lemy (AEGIS), Chris melo (Philips) , Gila Pike (Cogna) , Amit Popat (EPIC).
Gregorio lead the discussion. Comments made by Lynn are reviewed. A final version ready for VOTE will be published tonight. |
9:45 am–10:45 am | John | FHIR Profiling | FHIR profiling: discussion about the opportunity to start with NPFSm to draft a structured definition and put it on the ftp. Rob will set up the ftp in order to manage structured definition produced with forge.
ACTION ITEM: Gregorio will try to develop a structured definition using Forge ACTION ITEM: Rob will set up the ftp in order to become the location for structured definition |
10:45 am–11:00 am | — | Morning Break | — |
11:00 am–12:30 am | Charles/Fabio | PDLS (Joint with PCC) |
2 comments pending: cardinality for provencnace and security section needs to be improved. Charles and Fabio will work on those two tonight. Charles is confortable with discuss we had, he can have a version ready for a final review tomorrow. QEDm is due to Mary before August 7th. And mXDE should be sent to Mary by Monday. |
12:30 am–1:30 pm | — | Lunch | — |
1:30 pm–3:15 pm | Elliot/Mauro | Committee Operations
|
Another good point is to not having a queue of publication stuff competing with other domains. DECISION: We will proceed with this cycle.
Opening every 6 months , 4 tech meetings. ACTION ITEM: Elliot will draft a couple of proposal in order to restructure the IHE cycle. 2 entry point in one year cycle and a second proposal. Elliot will prepare a document to describe a proposal and share it with ITI tech and sponsors
Improvemnent using technology: ATNA, requirements are translated in schematron checks by KAreval team. And ATNA seems to be good starting point to leave PDF spec in favor of a structured definition. A sparate GSS server will be installed on ihe servers, that can be used to enter the requirement definition. JIRA could be used to track the CP management process. There are some governance stuff missing: provisioning of the service – backup , copy of the file, ecc… Same governance issue. Lynn Is waiting for the tool ready from Eric. Lynn want use structured definition for ATNA as a pilot (starting form the next cycle). After that , we will need to discuss with IHE international for the governance. Check-in again at the planning f2f. ACTION ITEM: Lynn will make sure to have the list of governance issue ready.
GAP: there is a technical gap that we should try to fix: what software your product include. Some interoperable format to publish this libraries. What else can do ITI ? thinking what profiles / infrastructure , can be valuable for integrity and availability. Robustness.
|
3:15 pm–3:30 pm | — | Afternoon Break | — |
3:30 pm–4:15 pm | Lynn | Framework Maintenance |
Security CPs in the Assigned CPs directory:
Editorial CPs-
|
4:15 pm–4:45 pm | Charles/Fabio | PDLS | Final comments reviewed. |
4:45 pm–5:00 pm | Elliot/Mauro | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates |
Friday, 21 July, 2017
Time
Oak Brook (CDT, UTC−05:00) |
Leads | Activity | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
8:30 am–9:00 am | — | Breakfast | — |
9:00 am–10:00 am | Luke | mCSD | Participants: Mauro Zanardini (Arsenàl.IT), Gregorio Canal (Arsenàl.IT), Rob Horn (AGFA), Elliot Silver (Change Healthcare) , Luke Duncan (IntraHealth) , John Moherke (By Light), Charles Parisot (GE), Joe Lamy (aegis), Chris Melo (PHILIPS)
MOTION: John move the motion to approve mCSD to TI, Chris seconded it. Joe abstains. MOTION APPROVED
|
10:00 am–10:45 am | Mauro/Gregorio | NPFS |
|
10:45 am–11:00 am | — | Morning Break | — |
11:00 am–12:00 am | Charles/Fabio | PDLS | |
12:00 am–12:30 am | Elliot/Mauro | TI Decision (Joint with Planning Committee) | |
12:30 am–1:30 pm | — | Lunch | — |
1:30 pm–3:00 pm | Lynn | Framework Maintenance |
Planning for FHIR “Release 4” updates in 2017-18:
Last year, we had more CPs that needed a lot of rework after ballot:
Gateway questions prior to accepting a CP (or finishing work on an existing CP):
Other ideas/opportunities:
Update to the supplement template: (Lynn has passed on to Mary & doc group)
|
3:00 pm | — | Adjourn | — |
April 2017 F2F – Volume Two Finalization Meeting 24–28 April 2017
This 5-day meeting is focused on a review of Vol. 2 content for work items, and public comment resolution on ongoing work.
- Meeting Location
- RSNA Building, Oak Brook, IL
WebEx/T-Con information
WebEx information for this meeting is:
- Meeting Number: 491 774 497
- Password: Ask Jeremiah Myers (jmyers@himss.org)
- Link: Webex
Agenda and Minutes
All times listed are tentative, and may be revised during the meeting—refresh often.
Time
Oak Brook, IL (CDT, UTC−05:00) |
Monday, 24 April | Tuesday, 25 April | Wednesday, 26 April | Thursday, 27 April | Friday, 28 April | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8:00 am–8:15 am | FHIR profiling demo | |||||
8:15 am–8:30 am | ||||||
8:30 am–8:45 am | Breakfast | Breakfast | Breakfast | Breakfast | Publication and Scheduling (during Breakfast) | |
8:45 am–9:00 am | ||||||
9:00 am–9:15 am | Introductions and Agenda Review | RMD | mCSD | FHIR Profiles
followed by RMD if time allows |
NPFS (and PDLS if time allows) | |
9:15 am–9:30 am | ||||||
9:30 am–9:45 am | FHIR Profiles | |||||
9:45 am–10:00 am | RMD | |||||
10:00 am–10:15 am | ||||||
10:15 am–10:30 am | ||||||
10:30 am–10:45 am | ||||||
10:45 am–11:00 am | Morning Break | Morning Break | Morning Break | Morning Break | Morning Break | |
11:00 am–11:15 am | ||||||
11:15 am–11:30 am | mCSD | NPFS | RMD | TI to FT Evaluation (joint with Planning Committee) | PDLS (and NPDS if needed) | |
11:30 am–11:45 pm | ||||||
11:45 pm–noon | ||||||
noon–12:15 pm | ||||||
12:15 pm–12:30 pm | ||||||
12:30 pm–12:45 pm | Lunch | Lunch | Lunch | Lunch | Lunch
Additional NPFS/PDLS time if needed | |
12:45 pm–1:00 pm | ||||||
1:00 pm–1:15 pm | ||||||
1:15 pm–1:30 pm | ||||||
1:30 pm–1:45 pm | NPFS | PDLS | Framework Maintenance | mCSD | Additional NPDS/PDLS time, if needed | |
1:45 pm–2:00 pm | ||||||
2:00 pm–2:15 pm | ||||||
2:15 pm–2:30 pm | PDLS & QEDm | |||||
2:30 pm–2:45 pm | Adjourn | |||||
2:45 pm–3:00 pm | ||||||
3:00 pm–3:15 pm | ||||||
3:15 pm–3:30 pm | Afternoon Break | Afternoon Break | Afternoon Break | Afternoon Break | ||
3:30 pm–3:45 pm | ||||||
3:45 pm–4:00 pm | PDLS | mCSD | Joint ITI/PCC/QRPH Session | RMD | ||
4:00 pm–4:15 pm | ||||||
4:15 pm–4:30 pm | ||||||
4:30 pm–4:45 pm | ||||||
4:45 pm–5:00 pm | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates |
Monday, 24 April, 2017
Time
Oak Brook (CDT, UTC−05:00) |
Leads | Activity | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
8:30 am–9:00 am | — | Breakfast | — |
9:00 am–9:30 am | Elliot/Mauro | Introductions and Agenda Review | Introductions made by Jeremiah. |
9:30 am–10:45 am | John | FHIR Profiles
|
Participants:
Fabio Buti: DEDALUS Nader Cheaib: ASIP Lynn Felhofer John Moehrke: By light Elliot Silver: Change Healthcare Gregorio Canal: Arsenàl.IT Joe Lamy: AEGIS Luke Duncan: IntraHealth Eric Heflin: Sequoia Project Ken Meyers: Merge/IBM Watson Charles Parisot: GE Irina Dillinger: ? Daniel Berenzeanu: ReadyComputing Michael Cooper: ? Ben Levy: Corepoint Health Tarik Idris: ICW FHIR STU3 updates: John presented the DSTU2 / STU3 updates. The goal of the week is to review all the 5 FHIR documents and have them ready for approval later this week. We would put them into ballot42 the next week.
Added Z.9.1 to describe how to handle identifiers in FHIR profiles. There is no conflict with Appendix E, used by PDQm, because that section is specifically related to the use of CX for PID-3. The cmte decided to keep both with some overlap but the existence of E seems to be helpful. There was a discussion about the urn:rfc requirements for patient ID, final decision is to keep the requirement. Lynn introduced a discussion about how to address publication of STU3 updates: we will go via CP ballot. If there will be a lot of discussions, and a lot of comments, we will re-ballot the documents in order to make extensive changes publicly available. Discussion about the supporting paging of query results for PDQm: FHIR has a paging mechanism that is discouraged. For consistency with PDQ, we will keep the section that points to FHIR paging. Another comments was about the addition of a score for the match, It is supported by PDQv3 and does not fit into FHIR semantics for the search response.
|
10:45 am–11:15 am | — | Morning Break | — |
11:15 am–12:30 am | Luke | mCSD | Luke Duncan lead the discussion about mCSD. The group started a discussion related how to document constraints to FHIR specs. The needs to requires the Server to return only FHIR resources that meet some specific criteria defined by the IHE profile.
The formal way is to define a FHIR profile: in order to have a “tag” and asks for resources that meet that profile (they are tagged). A second approach can be to define an operation. Third approach is to just define that the server can have non conformant resources but cannot return them, and leave that not formalized. The actual version proposed by Luke looks good for PC: requirements in vol.2 Message Semantics. |
12:30 am–1:30 pm | — | Lunch | — |
1:30 pm–3:15 pm | Mauro/Gregorio | NPFS | Gregorio is presenting Not Patient Document Sharing profile. There are 4 open issues to discuss.
|
3:15 pm–3:45 pm | — | Afternoon Break | — |
3:45 pm–4:45 pm | Charles/Fabio | PLDS | Charles and Fabio will review of the doc. A long discussion about the actor/transaction diagram is held. |
4:45 pm–5:00 pm | Elliot/Mauro | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | HOMEWORK: Joe will review RMD , Elliot mCSD , Lynn PDLS, Elliot will also provide feedbacks on NPFS. ATNA Appendix Z MHD are in the FTP ready for a cmte review. |
Tuesday, 25 April, 2017
Time
Oak Brook (CDT, UTC−05:00) |
Leads | Activity | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
8:00 am–9:00 am | — | FHIR Profiling Demo
|
— |
8:30 am–9:00 am | — | Breakfast | — |
9:00 am–10:45 am | Ken | RMD
(Note: 1 co-chair to concurrent DCC session) |
Participants:
Fabio Buti: DEDALUS Nader Cheaib: ASIP Lynn Felhofer John Moehrke: By light Elliot Silver: Change Healthcare Gregorio Canal: Arsenàl.IT Joe Lamy: AEGIS Luke Duncan: IntraHealth Eric Heflin: Sequoia Project Ken Meyers: Merge/IBM Watson Charles Parisot: GE Irina Dillinger: ? Daniel Berenzeanu: ReadyComputing Michael Cooper: ? Ben Levy: Corepoint Health Tarik Idris: ICW Elliott Lavy: Harriscomputer Karen Witting: ReadyCOmputing Rob Horn: AGFA
The set of comments related to “removal workflow” are not resolved. Decision to formulate an Open Issue. The profile support the most flexible approach, Comments related to ‘Metadata Integrity’: “The Administrator is responsible to leave the Registry in a consistent state” and the “Registry shall verify the integrity of metadata at the end of the delete operation” there is discussion about those two points. The cmte does not want to break DELETE metadata transaction, so technical requirements will be unchanged. A new Error Code is defined in order to be used (if needed… ) by the Registry if the Delete Request is leaving it in a un-consistent state.
|
10:45 am–11:15 am | — | Morning Break | — |
11:15 am–12:30 am | Mauro/Gregorio | NPFS | The document is reviewed. Gregorio will update the document in accordance to discussion had:
|
12:30 am–1:30 pm | — | Lunch | — |
1:30 pm–3:15 pm | Charles/Fabio | PDLS | Chalres and Fabio lead the discussion. The focus is to continue the review of the document. The discussion is focused on actor table and actor groupings. |
3:15 pm–3:45 pm | — | Afternoon Break | — |
3:45 pm–4:45 pm | Luke | mCSD | Luke lead the discussion. Continuation of review of the document. No big issues raised during the session. The document seems to be really close to go in PC. |
4:45 pm–5:00 pm | Elliot/Mauro | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | No homework. |
Wednesday, 26 April, 2017
Time
Oak Brook (CDT, UTC−05:00) |
Leads | Activity | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
8:30 am–9:00 am | — | Breakfast | — |
9:00 am–9:45 am | Luke | mCSD |
Participants: Fabio Buti: DEDALUS Nader Cheaib: ASIP Lynn Felhofer John Moehrke: By light Elliot Silver: Change Healthcare Gregorio Canal: Arsenàl.IT Joe Lamy: AEGIS Luke Duncan: IntraHealth Eric Heflin: Sequoia Project Ken Meyers: Merge/IBM Watson Charles Parisot: GE Irina Dillinger: ? Daniel Berenzeanu: ReadyComputing Michael Cooper: ? Ben Levy: Corepoint Health Tarik Idris: ICW Elliott Lavy: Harriscomputer Karen Witting: ReadyCOmputing Rob Horn: AGFA Carl Leitner (PATH) Chris Ashwell Lilley (?)
|
9:45 am–10:45 am | Ken | RMD | Ken lead the session, with the goal to complete the review of vol.1. There are no big technical issues in vol.2 to discuss. Vol.1 seems to be completed pending some editorial updates.
A big issue is raised: In many places of the TF the documentation says that "there is no delete mechanism". That is not true with RMD published. The cmte will address these edits separately. Adding an OI is enough. THIS IS A NOTE FOR THE TECH CMTE TO TAKE IN MIND |
10:45 am–11:15 am | — | Morning Break | — |
11:15 am–12:30 am | Ken | RMD
|
|
12:30 am–1:30 pm | — | Lunch | — |
1:30 pm–2:15 pm | Lynn | Framework Maintenance
|
TF Maintenance
|
2:15 pm–3:15 pm | Charles/Fabio | PDLS & QEDm (Joint session with PCC) | Additional Participants::
Chris melo (PHILIPS) Denise Downing (AORN) Milenkovic (ASIP) Thom Kuhn (ACP) Tone Southerland (Ready Computing) Emma Jones (Allscripts) Steve Moore (Washinghton College) Charles presented the joint work done between PCC and ITI. QEDm and PDLS are described. |
3:15 pm–3:45 pm | — | Afternoon Break | — |
3:45 pm–5:00 pm | TBD | Joint ITI/PCC/QRPH Session
|
PARTICIPANTS :
Action Item : ITI co-chair: Elliot/Mauro ask the DCC group to share the Appendiz Z with domain co-chairs with the purpose to be referenced by all the profile editors that are drafting FHIR-based profiles. ITI co-chairs will follow up also with the FHIR work-group in order to make it aware of the item. Read through the table of content of Appendix Z, with a focus on Z.10. Other sections have more technical content. Appendix Z cannot be used as a style-guide for profile drafting, but can be used as reference for many technical issues that a profile editor can encounter in drafting FHIR-based profiles. IHE FHIR cmte is working on the using of tools in order to produce structured technical specifications. ITI domain is starting to play with structure definition of FHIR profiles, and the output will be stored in the ftp site. If people wants to have guidance about how to draft an IHE profile based on FHIR, they can take a look to PDQm and MHD. When using Forge to produce structured specifications, editors shall assign an url to the profile. ITI recommend to use something like: http://ihe.net/fhir/tags/….. Or a link to the FTP site.
ITI is working on the STU3 update of FHIR profiles. There is a wiki page that track the ongoing work: http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/ITI_TI_Supp_Updates_to_FHIR_STU3 John is pursuing the idea to add an indicator in the front-page of each FHIR based profile in order to make clear to the reader the readiness state of the profile. We could add the lowest Maturity Level of the resources used. “ Lowest Fhir Maturity Number : X “ . This proposal will be addressed by the IHE FHIR work-group. Next joint meeting will be chaired by QRPH. The wheel of fortune agreed on that. |
Thursday, 27 April, 2017
Time
Oak Brook (CDT, UTC−05:00) |
Leads | Activity | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
8:30 am–9:00 am | — | Breakfast | — |
9:00 am–10:45 am | John | FHIR Profiles (followed by RMD if time allows) | Participants:
Ken Meyer (IBM Watson/Merge) Elliot Silver (Change Healthcare) Mauro Zanardini (Arsneàl.IT) Lynn Felhofer (IHE USA) Ben Levy (CorepointHealthcare) Gregorio Canal (Arsenàl.IT) Fabio Buti (DEDALUS) Nader Cheaib (ASIP) John Moehrke (By Light) Luke Duncan (IntraHealth) Chris Carr (RSNA) Rob Horn (AGFA)
John lead the discussion: Review of few last comments on MHD. Mauro shows ATNA RESTful Query. Just one comment to discuss. Publication FHIR: Lynn request is to have a version ready for ballot in the ftp site by tomorrow. Balllot will go out on Monday. All the FHIR profiles are ready. No objections to move all the TI FHIR supplements to ballot42.
|
10:45 am–11:15 am | — | Morning Break | — |
11:15 am–12:30 am | Elliot/Mauro | TI to FT Evaluation (joint with Planning Committee) | See ITI Annual Assessment of TI Supplements
DSG is approved to move in Final Text. : Technology consolidated, it has been tested, there are no OI. IMPORTANT: The next year, the profile assesment will be done in February. |
12:30 am–1:30 pm | — | Lunch | — |
1:30 pm–3:15 pm | Luke | mCSD | Luke lead the final review of mCSD. There are concerns about vol.1 but some comments will be submitted again in PC.
MOTION: Luke move to approve mCSD for PC pending editorial changes, John seconded it, Mauro Rob abstain. MOTION APPROVED |
3:15 pm–3:45 pm | — | Afternoon Break | — |
3:45 pm–4:45 pm | Ken | RMD | RMD: final review lead by Ken. Rob will update Policy Choices section.
Concerns about moving RMD in TI: Lynn Rob has concerns about policies section , Elliott is confident in transaction specification , but has concerns for vol.1 also. A dedicated call has been scheduled to address "Definition of remove". MOTION: Rob move to approve RMD for TI contingent approval during the tcon (on Tuesday 2nd May) about definition of removal and diagrams. Ben seconds. No abstainsions, no objections. MOTION APPROVED |
4:45 pm–5:00 pm | Elliot/Mauro | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates |
Friday, 28 April, 2017
Time
Oak Brook (CDT, UTC−05:00) |
Leads | Activity | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
8:30 am–9:00 am | Elliot/Mauro | Publication and Scheduling (Working Breakfast) |
|
9:00 am–10:45 am | Mauro/Gregorio | NPFS (and PDLS if time allows) | Document reviewed line by line. MOTION: John moves the motion to approve NPFS for PC, Mauro seconds , no discussion , no objections, no abstensions. MOTION APPROVED |
10:45 am–11:15 am | — | Morning Break | — |
11:15 am–12:30 am | Charles/Fabio | PDLS |
Last review of PDLS. Charles lead the discussion. MOTION: Charles moves to move PDLS in PC, pending integration of editorial comments , Elliot seconded it. No discussion no objection no abstenciton. MOTION APPROVED Charles to send the document on Monday to Lynn. Lynn will do a fast clean up on Monday. Charles asked the chairs to reach out planning for the public comment in order to involve national cmtes / and new reviewer for PC. Elliot will do that. |
12:30 am–1:30 pm | — | Lunch
Additional PDLS time if needed |
— |
1:30 pm–2:30 pm | Lynn |
|
|
2:30 pm | — | Adjourn | — |
February 2017 F2F – Volume One Finalization Meeting 6-10 February 2017
This 5-day meeting is focused on a review of Vol. 1 content for new work items, and public comment resolution on ongoing work.
- Meeting Location
- Institute for High Performance Computing Networking, Naples, Italy
WebEx/T-Con information
WebEx information for this meeting is:
- Meeting Number: 926 837 806
- Password: Ask Jeremiah Myers (jmyers@himss.org)
- Link: Webex
Agenda and Minutes
All times listed are tentative, and may be revised during the meeting—refresh often.
Time | Monday, 6 February | Tuesday, 7 February | Wednesday, 8 February | Thursday, 9 February | Friday, 10 February | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Naples
(Central European, UTC+01:00) |
Oak Brook
(US Central, UTC−06:00) | |||||
09:00–09:15 | 2:00 am–2:15 am | Breakfast | Breakfast | Breakfast | Breakfast | Breakfast |
09:15–09:30 | 2:15 am–2:30 am | Wrap-up and Scheduling | ||||
09:30–09:45 | 2:30 am–2:45 am | Introductions and Agenda Review | Joint session of ITI and PCC | Joint session of ITI, PCC, QRPH, and PHARM | FHIR | |
09:45–10:00 | 2:45 am–3:00 am | |||||
10:00–10:15 | 3:00 am–3:15 am | Non-patient Document Sharing | ||||
10:15–10:30 | 3:15 am–3:30 am | Not-Patient Document Sharing | ||||
10:30–10:45 | 3:30 am–3:45 am | Morning Break | Morning Break | Morning Break | ||
10:45–11:00 | 3:45 am–4:00 am | Morning Break | Morning Break | |||
11:00–11:15 | 4:00 am–4:15 am | Non-patient Document Sharing | Joint session of ITI, PCC, QRPH, and PHARM | Patient Data-element Locator Service | CPs | |
11:15–11:30 | 4:15 am–4:30 am | Patient Data-element Locator Service | ||||
11:30–11:45 | 4:30 am–4:45 am | |||||
11:45–12:00 | 4:45 am–5:00 am | |||||
12:00–12:15 | 5:00 am–5:15 am | CPs | ||||
12:15–12:30 | 5:15 am–5:30 am | |||||
12:30–12:45 | 5:30 am–5:45 am | Lunch | Lunch | Lunch | Lunch | |
12:45–13:00 | 5:45 am–6:00 am | |||||
13:00–13:15 | 6:00 am–6:15 am | Lunch | ||||
13:15–13:30 | 6:15 am–6:30 am | |||||
13:30–13:45 | 6:30 am–6:45 am | Mobile CSD/HPD | Patient Data-element Locator Service | Publication Schedule | Planning Committee Report | |
13:45–14:00 | 6:45 am–7:00 am | |||||
14:00–14:15 | 7:00 am–7:15 am | CPs | Remove Documents and Metadata | |||
14:15–14:30 | 7:15 am–7:30 am | |||||
14:30–14:45 | 7:30 am–7:45 am | |||||
14:45–15:00 | 7:45 am–8:00 am | |||||
15:00–15:15 | 8:00 am–8:15 am | |||||
15:15–15:30 | 8:15 am–8:30 am | |||||
15:30–15:45 | 8:30 am–8:45 am | Afternoon Break | Afternoon Break | Afternoon Break | Afternoon Break | |
15:45–16:00 | 8:45 am–9:00 am | |||||
16:00–16:15 | 9:00 am–9:15 am | Remove Documents and Metadata | Mobile CSD/HPD | CP | Remove Documents and Metadata (Session 2) | |
16:15–16:30 | 9:15 am–9:30 am | |||||
16:30–16:45 | 9:30 am–9:45 am | Remove Documents and Metadata | ||||
16:45–17:00 | 9:45 am–10:00 am | Mobile CSD/HPD | ||||
17:00–17:15 | 10:00 am–10:15 am | |||||
17:15–17:30 | 10:15 am–10:30 am | |||||
17:30–17:45 | 10:30 am–10:45 am | |||||
17:45–18:00 | 10:45 am–11:00 am | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates | Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates |
Monday, 6 February, 2017
Time | Leads | Activity | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Naples
(Central European, UTC+01:00) |
Oak Brook
(US Central, UTC−06:00) | |||
09:00–09:30 | 2:00 am–2:30 am | — |
Breakfast |
— |
09:30–10:00 | 2:30 am–3:00 am | Elliot/Mauro |
Introductions and Agenda Review |
Agenda is reviewed and updates are applied in order to fulfill a couple of requests.
|
10:00–10:45 | 3:00 am–3:45 am | Mauro/Gregorio |
Non-patient Document Sharing |
The document is revised by the Cmte. Use-cases need further work in orther to better specify the scenario of interest. They can be specified when a set of metadata and search parameters will be worked out. Gregorio and Mauro will produce two documents for tomorrow:
Gregorio will consolidate the last version of the supplement with comments made by Elliot. |
10:45–11:15 | 3:45 am–4:15 am | — |
Morning Break |
— |
11:15–12:30 | 4:15 am–5:30 am | Fabio/Charles |
Patient Data-element Locator Service |
Charles and Fabio presented the work done on the QEDm and PDLS supplements showing a ppt. The generic process flow connected to the PDLS has been approved by the Tech Cmte. The mapping between FHIR resource and CDA content is still outof scope and in charge to IHE clinical domains. Next steps:
|
12:30–13:30 | 5:30 am–6:30 am | — |
Lunch |
— |
13:30–15:30 | 6:30 am–8:30 am | Luke/Eric |
Mobile CSD/HPD |
Luke presented the mCSD/HPD supplement. There was a discussion about the pattern used to define the process flow. The Query/retrieve pattern has been compared with the Subscribe/Notify pattern. The choice will affect the number of Actors / Transactions / Options. Luke has been asked to produce a power point presentation with a comparison of the different patterns explored (do not need to spend time in order to produce a normative text but just in an informative way, in order to facilitate the discussion...).
Mauro will review the actual draft. |
15:30–16:00 | 8:30 am–9:00 am | — |
Afternoon Break |
— |
16:00–17:45 | 9:00 am–10:45 am | Ken |
Remove Documents and Metadata |
Ken presented the work done on "Remove Documents and Metadata" supplement. This supplment should be ready for PC after this f2f meeting.
The work-group decided to add to this supplement the Delete Metadata transaction, removing it from Metadata Update. This is a big chage for developers / Integration statments / CAT organization. The change will be communicated to the IHE community in two ways:
Ken has been asked to review use-cases in order to add more complexity related to the Delete Metadata stuff. Ken will publish a document ready for final review tomorrow. |
17:45–18:00 | 10:45 am–11:00 am | Elliot/Mauro |
Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates |
Reviewer are assigned to each supplement in order to speed up the revision:
|
Tuesday, 7 February, 2017
Time | Leads | Activity | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Naples
(Central European, UTC+01:00) |
Oak Brook
(US Central, UTC−06:00) | |||
09:00–09:30 | 2:00 am–2:30 am | — |
Breakfast |
— |
09:30–10:30 | 2:30 am–3:30 am | TBD |
Joint session of ITI and PCC
|
During the Joint session, Charles listed open issues related to mQED. The editors collected feedback from PCC and ITI. |
10:30–11:00 | 3:30 am–4:00 am | — |
Morning Break |
— |
11:00–12:30 | 4:00 am–5:30 am | Mauro/Gregorio |
Non-patient Document Sharing |
Gregorio and Mauro presented a spreadsheet that lists metadata of interest that can be used to classify non-patient documents. Some of the items within the list has been discussed and revised. Several approaches to support various versioning models were discussed.
The metadata list can be found here The final draft of the NPDS profile (READY FOR A FINAL READING) can be found at: FTP DOCUMENT |
12:30–13:30 | 5:30 am–6:30 am | — |
Lunch |
— |
13:30–15:30 | 6:30 am–8:30 am | Fabio/Charles |
Patient Data-element Locator Service |
Charles and Fabio presented the remaining part of the slides related to Patient Data-element Locator Service profile. The ppt can be found in the FTP site: PLDS/QEDm v0.8
|
15:30–16:00 | 8:30 am–9:00 am | — |
Afternoon Break |
— |
16:00–17:45 | 9:00 am–10:45 am | Luke/Eric |
Mobile CSD/HPD |
Luke presented 4 different options for actor/transaction diagram. The different options were analyzed and a final decision has been made:
In order to cover all the use-cases of interest for the editors, the best solution will be to define 4 actors and 2 transactions. Presentation can be found here: mILR Actors Option selected for next analysis is OPTION 4 |
17:45–18:00 | 10:45 am–11:00 am | Elliot/Mauro |
Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates |
no homework assigned |
Wednesday, 8 February, 2017
Time | Leads | Activity | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Naples
(Central European, UTC+01:00) |
Oak Brook
(US Central, UTC−06:00) | |||
09:00–09:30 | 2:00 am–2:30 am | — |
Breakfast |
— |
09:30–10:30 | 2:30 am–3:30 am | TBD |
Joint session of ITI, PCC, QRPH, and PHARM technical committees
|
The Action Item document can be found at: Action items |
10:30–11:00 | 3:30 am–4:00 am | — |
Morning Break |
— |
11:00–12:30 | 4:00 am–5:30 am | TBD |
Joint session of ITI, PCC, QRPH, and PHARM technical committees (continued) |
— |
12:30–13:30 | 5:30 am–6:30 am | — |
Lunch |
— |
13:30–14:00 | 6:30 am–7:00 am | Elliot/Mauro/Lynn |
Publication Schedule
ITI Comments form
|
DISUCSSION: The goal of the proposal is to deal with Change Proposals integration before Public Comment, TI will be published as soons as they are ready. More easy to keep in touch with people (no vacation time). Some issues: hard to address CPs coming out from CAT EU on time for re-pub. This model implies that there are more CPs approved but not integrated for the CAT. Another issue that needs to be managed will be the publication of a TI supplement that will be approved to move in FT in few months. After the discussion had, the cmte approve to change the publication schedule. Elliot will check with Mary if the proposed change works in her schedule and, if so, it will draft an email in order to announce to the googlegroup the change made (CP integration/pubblication of TIs in MAY)
|
14:00–15:30 | 7:00 am–8:30 am | Lynn |
CP Blitz - See input on "NAPLES F2F" tab on CP tracking spreadsheet
|
CP 923 was discussed; version -07 was approved as Completed and ready for ballot 39
Note to all: After the F2F, Lynn will compile all Completed CPs into ballot 39, likely the last one prior to the EU Connectathon. |
15:30–16:00 | 8:30 am–9:00 am | — |
Afternoon Break |
— |
16:00–16:30 | 9:00 am–9:30 am | Lynn |
CP |
— |
16:30–17:45 | 9:30 am–10:45 am | Ken |
Remove Documents and Metadata |
During this session, the latest version of the document has been reviewed and all comments / Open Issues have been resolved. Additional Feedbacks will be integrated by Ken in the document in order to have a draft ready for a top-to-bottom reading on Thursday. |
17:45–18:00 | 10:45 am–11:00 am | Elliot/Mauro |
Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates |
no homework assigned. |
Thursday, 9 February, 2017
Time | Leads | Activity | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Naples
(Central European, UTC+01:00) |
Oak Brook
(US Central, UTC−06:00) | |||
09:00–09:30 | 2:00 am–2:30 am | — |
Breakfast |
— |
09:30–10:30 | 2:30 am–3:30 am | John |
FHIR
|
Lynn produced a report about the NA CAT. We had good participation (less than expected). Evidence is that Vendors are not leading the change. It is more a pull than push from vendors. Political/management spheres are asking for it. STU3 in balloting. By the end of the month the new version of the standard will be published. So we can start our review starting from that date.
CPs created to track updates to STU3; assigned to John M:
John will take ownership of updates related to MHD and PDQ; Mauro: RESTful ATNA (attention to the names changed); Daniel: PIXm; Luke: mACM. Editors should pay attention to changes applied to field names. There is a page in the fhir build that marks updates. The cmte agreed on Sending a request out to Vendors of CAT and other interested parties (specific google groups) describing our intent to update the supplements. The contact list of people interested will be created by Lynn, John will prepare the email. John will put together a work-plan for PIXm.
|
10:30–11:00 | 3:30 am–4:00 am | — |
Morning Break |
— |
11:00–12:30 | 4:00 am–5:30 am | Fabio/Charles |
Patient Data-element Locator Service
|
Session aimed to collect instructions and details to fix PDLS.
Context: QEDm has some Open issues, but all the critical stuff that affect PDLS are resolved. Top to bottom Review of the document. Open issues on PDLS are already answered. RECON is needed to be supported as a grouping. But evidence of reconciliation executed is important for the client. Now it is known just per configuration. Remove PDLS option for recon. It is a deployment strategy/choice. This profile deals only with the sharing of data, does not deal with quality of data (this can be done via deployment choices, grouping with recon agent). RECON is dealed only in cross-profile section. Charles/Fabio are asked to modify the Actor/Transaction diagram in order to reflect real requirements introduced by the profile. |
12:30–13:30 | 5:30 am–6:30 am | — |
Lunch |
— |
13:30–14:00 | 6:30 am–7:00 am | Daniel/Eric |
Planning Committee Report
|
Daniel identified 3 groups of profiles related to Idenitty Management / Document Sharing / Security. Plan is to create a dedicated task force to address each theme (as it has been done with Workflow). Daniel will send out an invite for a first call.
|
14:00–15:30 | 7:00 am–8:30 am | Ken |
Remove Documents and Metadata
|
The cmte started a final review of the document. |
15:30–16:00 | 8:30 am–9:00 am | — |
Afternoon Break |
— |
16:00–16:45 | 9:00 am–9:45 am | Ken |
Remove Documents and Metadata:
|
The cmte scheduled two additional calls to complete the review: 14th Feb and 23rd Feb to vote for the PC publication.
Follow-up
|
16:45–17:45 | 9:45 am–10:45 am | Luke |
Mobile CSD/HPD
|
|
17:45–18:00 | 10:45 am–11:00 am | Elliot/Mauro |
Wrap-up, homework, agenda updates |
— |
Friday, 10 February, 2017
Time | Leads | Activity | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Naples
(Central European, UTC+01:00) |
Oak Brook
(US Central, UTC−06:00) | |||
09:00–09:15 | 2:00 am–2:15 am | — |
Breakfast |
— |
09:15–10:15 | 2:30 am–3:30 am | Mauro/Elliot | Wrap-up
|
Next work-group calls are scheduled and invites were sent out to the ITI Tech google group. |
10:15–10:45 | 3:15 am–3:45 am | — |
Morning Break |
— |
10:45–11:00 | 3:45 am–4:00 am | — |
Not Patient Document sharing:
|
— |
11:00–13:00 | 4:00 am–6:00 am | Lynn |
CP prioritization??
Determine bundle focus of CP calls for Feb & March:
Different approach to audit message CPs? Review Incoming CPs: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/TF_Maintenance/CPs/0_Incoming/
Review Assigned CPs ready for discussion:
Ballot 39 dates. See --> |
CP prioritization:
Different approach to audit message CPs?
Focus for Feb & Mar Thurs CP calls:
Incoming CP review:
Assigned CP review:
Ballot 39 dates:
|
13:00–14:00 | 6:00 am–7:00 am | — |
Lunch / Adjourn |
— |
November 2016 F2F – Technical Profile Kick Off Meeting Nov 16-17 2016
This 2-day meeting is focused on a review of the detailed profile proposals, and selection of which work items will be selected for the 2016/2017 year based on committee resources and technical readiness.
Meeting Location: Oakbrook, IL RSNA Building
Meetings and Tcons
Webex information for this meeting is:
Meeting Number: 923 333 125 Meeting Password: Ask Jeremiah Myers (jmyers@himss.org)
link: https://himss.webex.com/himss/j.php?MTID=mf5b210557346876fdd4d4d6815a4fd5b
Agenda November 2016, Face to Face
All times listed are tentative at the moment and may be revised the day of the meeting. For a look at all the detailed proposals associated with this meeting are located at the 2017/2018 Technical Cmte Folder [1].
Day 1, Wednesday, November 16th, 2016.
Activity | Leads | Time | Minute |
---|---|---|---|
Breakfast | 8:30AM – 9:00AM | ||
Introduction -( Agenda Review , Round table introduction, Discussion on voting process, sponsor communications, formalize which are authors commitments: wiki updates , f2f participation, identification of editors/primary authors…) | Elliot / Mauro | 9:00AM – 10:00AM | Participants: Ben Levy (Corepoint) Elliot Silver (McKesson) Karen Witting (Ready Computing) John Moherke (Moherke Research) Charles Parisot (GE Healthcare) Nader Cheaib (Asip Sanitè) Matt Blackmon (?) Kirsten Boyd (HIMSS) Lynn Felhoper (ITI Technical Manager) Tarik Idris (ICW) Joe Lamy (AEGIS.net) Eric Heflin (THSA) Fabio Buti (DEDALUS) Bill Majurski (NIST) Ken Meyer (Merge/IBM) Luke Duncan (Intrahealth) Chris Melo (Philips) Gregorio Canal (Arsenal.IT), Rob Horn (AGFA Healthcare), Mauro Zanardini (Arsenal.IT).
Minute: Round table introduction of attendees. Agenda has been reviewed. No changes to the agenda has been applied. Voting procedure: we will try to reach consensus. After consensus reached we will move a motion and people can vote the motion. The Tech cmte agreed that the Vote casted by ITI tech is intended to propose to the planning what we can address. Planning Cmte will revise recommendation made by the Tech Cmte (during the joint meeting) and will accept or reject taking in consideration prioritization and tech cmte capacities. Elliot presented some slides related to IHE's Patent disclosure policies. If someone needs more info about this topic, should ask IHE secretariat. Mauro listed profile authors commitments in order to reach an agreement within the cmte. Profile authors are asked to create wiki page after TI publication. Wiki can be used to track activities of sub-work groups, and this is approach is strongly suggested by co-chairs. |
Sharing platform for not patient centric documents | Gregorio Canal / Mauro | 10:00AM – 10:35AM | Gregorio presented some slides related to the detailed proposal. It has been suggested to keep search separated from retrieve. The cmte would clearly identify the scope of the profile in order to keep the proposal small. it is suggested to take in consideration use-cases that are based on document's sharing and not other type of files. In order to have an efficient search mechanism, we should identify each metadata. We should classify the type of the document but there are additional metadata that will be important: Confidentiality, Integrity. In fact access control is needed and in scope for the profile (probably can be more focused on content creation instead of content disclosure).
The cmte would identify categories of documents that can be managed using this profile: documents that do not contain PHI and document that do not contain PI. The cmte identified two tech approaches that could address the problem: extension of XDS.b and a profiling of FHIR documentReference resource. DocumentReference could be the right solution and provides search metadata that already address confidentiality, integrity and content classification. Some ITI members posted out that there are some other RESTful solution. If we choose RESTfull i twill be easy to formalize metadata. OMA protocol can be a solution, maybe more stable. The cmte agreed on limiting the proposal to: documents that do not convey personal identifiable data, and related to 3 use-cases presented. Access control is part of the scope, in particular for creation. Tarik suggested that we should add a use-case in which we stress the role of the creation that can be done by many system (multiple creators). During the profiling we should take in consideration compatibility with XDS, it will be a profile complementary to XDS. |
Patient-centric Data-element Location Service | Charles | 10:35am – 11:50am |
Charles presented the detailed proposal. A list of use-cases of interested are described. Charles confirmed that the mapping bewteew CDA and FHIR is out of scope for this profile. In scope to move from XDS to this profile alowing the following usecase: give me all immunization and give me immunization in this docs (data element that will be taken in consideration are well defined in QED profile). QED is a profile of interest because, we would create a light weight version of that profile (we will try to align this work with HL7 Argonaut initiative) in order to provide to a Data Element Consumer actor to access data element using a RESTful query. Breakdown of tasks:
|
BREAK | 11:50AM - 11:55AM | ||
Remove Documents from XDS Repository | Ken | 11:55AM - 12:30AM | Ken Mayer presented the detailed proposal. The proposal is well understood from the cmte because it has been a discussion topic for many years. There are concerns about the approach taken for the deletion: the doc administrator shall send a delete request to the registry (to delete metadata) and after that it has to send a delete request to the Rep or should be the Registry that will delete docs from Repository? The best solution still need to be designed.
Administrator should be defined as a separate actor that can be grouped with other actors in order to fit different use-cases or patterns. The Cmte is confident that the size and the scope of the profile allow to successfully produce the desired output. |
LUNCH | 12:30pm – 1:30pm | ||
mobile HPD/CSD | Luke/Carl/Eric | 1:30am – 2:15am | Luke presented in collaboration with Eric the detailed proposal. The intent of the proposal is to create a mobile/FHIR profile that covers all the use-cases defined in HPD/CSD. There are some use-cases that are not needed.The cmte asks editors to narrow down the set of use-cases. Take the CSD/HPD list of use-cases as starting point, but not bound to satisfy all them. The technical Cmte do need to identify a complete scope (The primary use.cases are identified and highland in the detailed proposal). The mapping to the original soap versions of the profile is not in scope (it is not part of the main needs). This profile will be Independedent from HPD/CSD. |
Start Assessment of proposals: Evaluation Matrix completion and Discussions about new work-items | Elliot/Mauro | 2:15pm – 2:45pm | Profile are sized in order to identify the effort needed for the drafting and for the review of profiles themselves. |
MUST DO n°1: Maintenance (general) | Lynn | 2:45pm – 3:15pm | Lynn proposed a new apporach to address CP’s and a change in the scheduling (1 hour per week). Thee different scheduling are discussed. The cmte think that to take a decision on the scheduling it is needed to reach out the availabilities of main CP contributors. |
MUST DO n°2: FHIR Updates | John | 3:15pm – 3:45pm | John aligned the cmte about the publication time line of STU3 HL7 FHIR standard. The STU3 will be published at the end of March.
The cmte analyzed the various profile based on FHIR, to identify the approach to take in addressing the update: MHD: pretty much no changes due to STU3. There is a need to update just the base urls. This can be done in parallel to STU3 comment reconciliation and can be done via normal CP process. The goal is to be able to test in the European CAT the actual version of MHD plus a balloted and approved CP that moves it in STU3. No additional publication cycle needed. PDQm: no many changes Update only base urls and can be done via normal CP process. It will follow the same approach of MHD. ATNA: some editorial changes but not technical big changes. The urgency for this profile is lower so it will be fixed during the spring via a normal CP process. Profiles that need discussion: mACM: small work-item. Changes are not big. But there are conceptual changes that we need to agree on. PIXm: re-evaluate the solution (small size). The cmte should allocate some time for those profiles starting from the February meeting. |
Break | 3:45pm – 4:00pm | ||
Joint meeting with QRPH , PCC, RAD:
1. Domains Report about work items selected for the new cycle. 2. In the context of FUNC profile in RAD and exploring what existing methods might exist to help deal with:
HPD doesn't solve it directly but may be able to help. 3. Patient-centric Data-element Location Service: This proposal relies on PCC profiles. In addition to that the aim of this proposal is to identify a platform that can be further specialized by IHE clinical domains in order to provide a mapping between contents inside a document and content in a FHIR resource. |
- | 4:00PM - 5:30PM |
Participants: John Stamm (Epic) Chris Melo (Philips) Charles Parisot (GE) Nader Cheaib (ASIP Sante) Mauro Zanardini (Arsenal IT) Elliot Silver (McKesson) Gila Pyke (Cognaissance) Ben Levy (Corepoint) Amit Popat (Epic) Thierry Dart (ASIP) Andrea Fourquet Joe Lamy (SSA) Emma Jones (Allscripts) Denise Downing (ORN) Jeremiah Myers (HIMSS) Celina Roth (HIMSS) Luke Duncan (Intrahealth) Ann Diamond (ACOG) Thom Kuhn (American College of Physicians) Daniel Berezeanu (Ready Computing) Didi Davis (Sequoia) George Cole (Allscripts) John Moehrke Ken Meyer (Merge) Lori Fourquet (e-HealthSign) Lynn Felhofer (IHE Tech Project Manager) Rob Horn (AGFA) Vassil Peytchev (EPIC) Eric Heflin (THSA) Nichole Drye-Mayo (RSNA) Matt Blackman (E-health Exchange) Lauren Lemieux (ACOG) Ioana Singureanu (VA) Kristen Boyd (HIMSS)
The action items document can be found in the FTP site at: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/iheitiyr15-2017-2018/Technical_Cmte/NovemberF2F/F2F_material/Joint%20meeting%20ITI-PCC-QRPH_20161116%20action%20items.docx |
Day 2, Thursday, November 17th, 2016.
Spreadsheet available here: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/iheitiyr15-2017-2018/Technical_Cmte/NovemberF2F/2016_TechnicalCommittee_prioritization_review_v02.xls
Activity | Leads | Time | Minute |
---|---|---|---|
Breakfast | 8:30AM – 9:00AM | ||
Agenda Review / Residual Discussion / Eventually review the matrix
|
Elliot / Mauro | 9:00AM – 10:00AM |
Participants: Luke Duncan (intraHealth), Joey Lamy (SSA) , Nader Cheaib (ASIP Sante), Mauro Zanardini (Arsenal IT) , Ben Levy (Corepoint), Lynn Felhofer (IHE), Eric Heflin (THSA) , Fabio Buti (Dedalus), Ken Meyer (IBM/merge), John Moherke (Moherke Research), Karima Blounquard, Mick Talley, Kirsten Boyd (HIMSS), Silver Elliot (McKesson) Minute: The Agenda has been reviewed, and residual open topics are analyzed for each profile: -breakdown pf tasks for the Patient-centric Data-element Location Service: an agreement is subscribed between ITI and PCC domains: 1. IHE-ITI has coordinated with IHE-PCC and reached the following agreement:
2. concerns about use-cases that need to be covered by CSD/HPD has been risen: Luke and Eric presented the new list of use-cases |
Continuation of Assessment of proposals: Evaluation Matrix, completion discussions, reach agreement on new workitems. | Elliot/Mauro | 10:00AM - 10:45AM |
The cmte continued to complete the spreadsheet with EVALUATION MATRIX. The intent is to quantify work-load in order evaluate if all the 4 new work-items can be accepted. It seemed manageable, but the cmte asked the co-chairs after each f2f to analyze if the time spent in each proposal is alligned with estimation and will identitfy potential risks. Another key point is to identify Mentors for larger proposal that have to keep the editors on track. Ben moved the motion to accept all the 4 new work-items. Charles seconded, no objection, Rob Horn abstains. Completed evaluation matrix: ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/iheitiyr15-2017-2018/Technical_Cmte/NovemberF2F/2016_TechnicalCommittee_prioritization_review_v02.xls |
Break | 10:45AM - 11:00AM | ||
Joint meeting with Planning: Vote Results | Elliot / Mauro | 11:00AM – 11:30AM |
The joint ITI PC/TC meeting was called to order. Our domain sponsor took roll and determined that a quorum of voting members was present. The ITI felt it could perform all work items for the items sent by ITI PT to ITI TC for evaluation this cycle. As per ITI TC, the estimated capacity of the ITI TC is equal to the estimated work load for the items sent to ITI TC for evaluation this cycle. The joint workgroup explored ways to reduce workload. No substantial ways were identified. A discussion occured about cutting a work item, and the members seemed to feel that was not necessary. Two optimizations were identified: 1) Sequence the Document Delete work item first, to reduce the overhead of managing it the entire cycle, and 2) holding more tcons before the F2F meetings to increase F2F meeting efficiency It was thought that this may help some, but potentially not enough to provide for a buffer for unexpected work load problems. The group discussed careful management of the work items to keep scope realistic for this cycle. Motion by Eric H to approve the work items from ITI TC, with guidance to move the Document Delete forward in the schedule if possible, and for ITI TC to carefully manage scope. Karen W seconded the motion. No discussion ensued. No objections and no abstentions were raised. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned.
|
Schedule tons | Elliot / Mauro | 11:30AM-12:30PM | Tcons has been scheduled and webbed invitation will be sent the next week. |
Social LUNCH with Andrea Garay (RSNA) (for people that need to leave …) | 12:30 – 13:30 | ||
Open-discussion about Social Media and IHE | Andrea Garay (RSNA) | 13:30 - 14:30 | |
ADJURN | 14:30 |