Difference between revisions of "Radiology Proposals 2008-2009"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
+
{{TOCright}}
 
===Final Selection===
 
===Final Selection===
The 2008-09 workitems will be selected by the Planning Committee on October 22nd.
+
The Planning Committee selected the following 2008-09 work items during the [[Rad Plan Minutes 2008-10-22|Oct 22 T-Con]] :
 +
:* [[Basic Image Review - Detailed Proposal| Basic Image Review]]
 +
:* [[PDI Extensions - Detailed Proposal| PDI Extensions]]
 +
:* [[XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology - Detailed Proposal| XDS-I Using XDS.b]]
 +
:* [[Enhanced DICOM Objects - Detailed Proposal| Enhanced DICOM Objects - (CT/MR Contrast Perfusion & MR Diffusion)]]
 +
:* [[Rad TF Maintenance 2008-09 - Detailed Proposal| TF Maintenance]]
 +
     
 +
 
 +
The evaluated proposals that were considered are listed in the following table. 
 +
 
 +
The "slates of work" that were proposed during the selection meeting are shown below the table, along with the estimate of Tech Cmte bandwith each slate would require.
 +
 
 
{| style="width:70%" border="1" cellpadding="4"
 
{| style="width:70%" border="1" cellpadding="4"
 
! Profile                                                    !! Editor    !! Effort !! Tag
 
! Profile                                                    !! Editor    !! Effort !! Tag
Line 25: Line 36:
 
| [[Scheduled Workflow 2.0 - Detailed Proposal]]            || C. Lindop ||        ||  
 
| [[Scheduled Workflow 2.0 - Detailed Proposal]]            || C. Lindop ||        ||  
 
|-
 
|-
| - - - Operator Name, HL7-2.6 and fold-in PIR/Options ||   ||  35%   || F1
+
| - - - Operator Name, HL7-2.6 and fold-in PIR/Options       ||           ||  35%   || F1
 
|-
 
|-
 
| - - - also address additional SWF II Whitepaper uses cases ||          || 80%    || F2
 
| - - - also address additional SWF II Whitepaper uses cases ||          || 80%    || F2
Line 42: Line 53:
 
Slate 4 - A B C F1 G = 120%
 
Slate 4 - A B C F1 G = 120%
  
Slate 5 - A B C E2 G = 115%
+
Slate 5 - A B C E2 G = 110%
 +
 
 +
Slate 6 - A B C D2 F1 G = 175%
  
 
===Detailed Proposals===
 
===Detailed Proposals===
Line 56: Line 69:
 
** [[Image Management Enhancements - Detailed Proposal]]
 
** [[Image Management Enhancements - Detailed Proposal]]
  
* [[Scheduled Workflow 2.0 - Detailed Proposal]]]
+
* [[Scheduled Workflow 2.0 - Detailed Proposal]]
  
 
* [[Mammography Reporting Workflow - Detailed Proposal]]
 
* [[Mammography Reporting Workflow - Detailed Proposal]]
Line 92: Line 105:
 
===Call for Proposals===
 
===Call for Proposals===
 
Interested parties were invited to submit proposal pages based on the [[Brief Proposal Template]] by Sept 15, 2008.
 
Interested parties were invited to submit proposal pages based on the [[Brief Proposal Template]] by Sept 15, 2008.
 +
 +
You are also welcome to update and resubmit proposals from '''[[Radiology Proposals 2007-2008|prior years]]'''.
  
  
 
[[Radiology]]
 
[[Radiology]]

Latest revision as of 17:53, 12 August 2009

Final Selection

The Planning Committee selected the following 2008-09 work items during the Oct 22 T-Con :


The evaluated proposals that were considered are listed in the following table.

The "slates of work" that were proposed during the selection meeting are shown below the table, along with the estimate of Tech Cmte bandwith each slate would require.

Profile Editor Effort Tag
Basic Image Review - Detailed Proposal D. Clunie 40% A
PDI Extensions - Detailed Proposal D. Clunie 15% B
XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology - Detailed Proposal P. Seifert 20% C
Image Management Enhancements - Detailed Proposal D. Heaney
- - - address image rejection only 20% D1
- - - address image synchronization 60% D2
Enhanced DICOM Objects - Detailed Proposal D. Donker
- - - CT/MR Cardiac, MR Diffusion, CT/MR Contrast Perfusion 45% E1
- - - MR Diffusion, CT/MR Contrast Perfusion only 30% E2
Scheduled Workflow 2.0 - Detailed Proposal C. Lindop
- - - Operator Name, HL7-2.6 and fold-in PIR/Options 35% F1
- - - also address additional SWF II Whitepaper uses cases 80% F2
- - - and further address Distributed Workflow 110% F3
Rad TF Maintenance 2008-09 - Detailed Proposal CoChairs 5-10% G

Slate 1 - A B C E2 F1 G = 145%

Slate 2 - A C E2 G = 100%

Slate 3 - A B C G = 85%

Slate 4 - A B C F1 G = 120%

Slate 5 - A B C E2 G = 110%

Slate 6 - A B C D2 F1 G = 175%

Detailed Proposals

The following detailed proposals are being prepared for evaluation by the Technical Cmte. Detailed Proposals are due Sept 30.

Tech Cmte evaluations are inserted at the bottom of each proposal.


Editors: To convert your Brief Proposal to a Detailed Proposal:

  • Use the new link above (Changed "Brief" to "Detailed")
  • Copy your Brief proposal text into the new page (don't forget to save)
  • Copy the Delta Proposal Template into the bottom of the new page
  • Update as necessary
  • Your goal is to give sufficient detail for the Tech Cmte to be able to evaluate the technical feasibility and effort required.

Brief Proposals

The following brief proposals were selected on Sept 17 for expansion to detailed proposals.

This first group will be evaluated in the context of a Radiology Image Sharing Roadmap to be sketched by the Planning Cmte.


  • Mammography Reporting Workflow - Brief Proposal was referred to the Mammo Subcmte. The detailed proposal should clarify the need for bidirectional integration rather than individual product features. A discussion issue should also be added about whether Mammo industry attention should be focused on a new profile or on rolling out the recently completed Mammo Acq. Workflow profile. The proposal must reviewed by the Mammography technical subcommittee.

Call for Proposals

Interested parties were invited to submit proposal pages based on the Brief Proposal Template by Sept 15, 2008.

You are also welcome to update and resubmit proposals from prior years.


Radiology