Difference between revisions of "Rad Plan Minutes 07.10.24"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* Paul Seifert, Agfa, voting | * Paul Seifert, Agfa, voting | ||
* Niki Wirsz, Siemens, voting | * Niki Wirsz, Siemens, voting | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The Agenda and proposed selection method were reviewed. | ||
| + | |||
==Proposal Review== | ==Proposal Review== | ||
| Line 25: | Line 29: | ||
* German National Extension possible, but likely not until spring | * German National Extension possible, but likely not until spring | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | The Proposals, effort estimates for one or more defined approaches, and and straw poll popularity (choose two favorites) are listed here: | |
| − | |||
| − | : | ||
| − | Enhanced DICOM | + | {| style="width:95%" border="1" cellpadding="3" |
| − | + | ! Proposal | |
| − | + | ! Alternative Approaches with estimated % effort | |
| + | ! Straw Poll | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Radiation Dose | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | * 25% .......for dose capture and submission to registries | ||
| + | * 30-35% ..to also support download of Dose benchmarks/statistics | ||
| + | |2 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Enhanced DICOM | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | * 35% ......for 3 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine) | ||
| + | * 55% ......for 4 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine, Cardiac Imaging) | ||
| + | |3 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Mammo CAD Workflow | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | * 35% ......Mammo CAD Profile as described (triggers and behaviors) | ||
| + | |0 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |PDI for Large Datasets | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | * 30% | ||
| + | |4 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Mammo Acquisition Workflow | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | * 35-45% .....if Profile based on current SWF | ||
| + | * 10-15% .....if just a User's Handbook on how to deploy Mammo Acquisition with the current SWF | ||
| + | |3 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Scheduled Workflow 2.0 | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | * 200% ...........SWF II over two years. No public comment this year. Interim Whitepaper for Mammography Acquisition. | ||
| + | * 105%/105% ..Develop Ordering (HL7) this year; Acquisition (DICOM) the next. Risk of missing dependencies. | ||
| + | * 50%/160% ....Develop Use Cases this year; Profile the next year or two. | ||
| + | |6 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Critical Results | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | * N/A | ||
| + | |0 | ||
| + | |} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| + | Reporting is going to move out of band. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Work Package Nominations== | ==Work Package Nominations== | ||
| Line 78: | Line 103: | ||
| Package H || SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (95%) || 0 || - || - | | Package H || SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (95%) || 0 || - || - | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
==Selection== | ==Selection== | ||
| + | |||
Package A: Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%) | Package A: Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%) | ||
Revision as of 16:27, 24 October 2007
Attendees:
- Chris Lindop, GE – Radiology Planning Co-chair - voting
- Kevin O’Donnell, Toshiba – Radiology Planning Co-chair, voting
- Ellie Avraham, Carestream - Radiology Technical Co-chair, voting
- Ruth Berge, GE – not voting
- Chris Carr, RSNA, not voting
- David Clunie, RadPharm, voting
- Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA, not voting
- Lynn Felhofer, Technical Project Manager, not voting
- Cindy Levy, Merge, voting
- Cor Loef, Philips, voting by phone – no Webex Access
- John Paganini, Guardian Health, voting
- Dave Robaska, Cerner, voting
- Paul Seifert, Agfa, voting
- Niki Wirsz, Siemens, voting
The Agenda and proposed selection method were reviewed.
Proposal Review
The 7 Detailed Proposals were summarized (5 min each) and discussed (10-15 min each).
Tech Cmte Maintenance work was estimated at around 5% this year.
- Few CPs in queue, No major CPs, No urgent CPs, Large numbers of CPs not expected
- Some work may be required for NM
- Significant Editing not expected for Spanish or Japanese National Extensions
- German National Extension possible, but likely not until spring
The Proposals, effort estimates for one or more defined approaches, and and straw poll popularity (choose two favorites) are listed here:
| Proposal | Alternative Approaches with estimated % effort | Straw Poll |
|---|---|---|
| Radiation Dose |
|
2 |
| Enhanced DICOM |
|
3 |
| Mammo CAD Workflow |
|
0 |
| PDI for Large Datasets |
|
4 |
| Mammo Acquisition Workflow |
|
3 |
| Scheduled Workflow 2.0 |
|
6 |
| Critical Results |
|
0 |
Reporting is going to move out of band.
Work Package Nominations
| Package | Work Items (and % effort) | Ballot 1 | Ballot 2 | Ballot 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Package A | Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%) | 3 | 5 | 7 |
| Package B | SWF 50%, Rad Dose 20%, PDI 30% (100%) | 0 | - | - |
| Package C | SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, Enhanced DICOM 35% (100%) | 2 | 2 | - |
| Package D | Rad Dose 30%, Enhanced DICOM 35%, Mammo Acq 15% (80%) | 1 | - | - |
| Package E | Rad Dose 20%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (115%) | 1 | - | - |
| Package F | Enhanced DICOM 55%, PDI 30%, Mammo Acq 15% (100%) | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Package G | Mammo Acq 15%, SWF 50%, Rad Dose 30% (95%) | 1 | - | - |
| Package H | SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (95%) | 0 | - | - |
Selection
Package A: Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%)