Rad Plan Minutes 07.10.24

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Attendees:

  • Chris Lindop, GE – Radiology Planning Co-chair - voting
  • Kevin O’Donnell, Toshiba – Radiology Planning Co-chair, voting
  • Ellie Avraham, Carestream - Radiology Technical Co-chair, voting
  • Ruth Berge, GE – not voting
  • Chris Carr, RSNA, not voting
  • David Clunie, RadPharm, voting
  • Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA, not voting
  • Lynn Felhofer, Technical Project Manager, not voting
  • Cindy Levy, Merge, voting
  • Cor Loef, Philips, voting by phone – no Webex Access
  • John Paganini, Guardian Health, voting
  • Dave Robaska, Cerner, voting
  • Paul Seifert, Agfa, voting
  • Niki Wirsz, Siemens, voting


The Agenda and proposed selection method were reviewed.


Proposal Review

The 7 Detailed Proposals were summarized (5 min each) and discussed (10-15 min each).

Tech Cmte Maintenance work was estimated at around 5% this year.

  • Few CPs in queue, No major CPs, No urgent CPs, Large numbers of CPs not expected
  • Some work may be required for NM
  • Significant Editing not expected for Spanish or Japanese National Extensions
  • German National Extension possible, but likely not until spring


The Proposals, effort estimates for one or more defined approaches, and and straw poll popularity (choose two favorites) are listed here:

Proposal Alternative Approaches with estimated % effort Straw Poll
Radiation Dose
  • 25% .......for dose capture and submission to registries
  • 30-35% ..to also support download of Dose benchmarks/statistics
 2
Enhanced DICOM
  • 35% ......for 3 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine)
  • 55% ......for 4 Profiles (General Enhanced, Contrast Perfusion, Multistack Spine, Cardiac Imaging)
 3
Mammo CAD Workflow
  • 35% ......Mammo CAD Profile as described (triggers and behaviors)
 0
PDI for Large Datasets
  • 30%
  • Note: DVD Compatibility testing to gather concrete information on the scale and nature of the problem will take place at the January Connectathon regardless of whether a profile is scheduled for development this year.
 4
Mammo Acquisition Workflow
  • 35-45% .....if Profile based on current SWF
  • 10-15% .....if just a User's Handbook on how to deploy Mammo Acquisition with the current SWF
 3
Scheduled Workflow 2.0
  • 200% ...........SWF II over two years. No public comment this year. Interim Whitepaper for Mammography Acquisition.
  • 105%/105% ..Develop Ordering (HL7) this year; Acquisition (DICOM) the next. Risk of missing dependencies.
  • 50%/160% ....Develop Use Cases this year; Profile the next year or two.
 6
Critical Results
  • N/A (PCC plans to evaluate the detailed proposal)
 0


Reporting is going to move out of band.

Work Package Nominations

Eight alternative work packages were nominated.

Package Work Items (and % effort) Ballot 1 Ballot 2 Ballot 3
Package A Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%) 3 5 7
Package B SWF 50%, Rad Dose 20%, PDI 30% (100%) 0 - -
Package C SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, Enhanced DICOM 35% (100%) 2 2 -
Package D Rad Dose 30%, Enhanced DICOM 35%, Mammo Acq 15% (80%) 1 - -
Package E Rad Dose 20%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (115%) 1 - -
Package F Enhanced DICOM 55%, PDI 30%, Mammo Acq 15% (100%) 2 3 3
Package G Mammo Acq 15%, SWF 50%, Rad Dose 30% (95%) 1 - -
Package H SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15%, PDI 30% (95%) 0 - -

Selection

Package A: Rad Dose 30%, SWF 50%, Mammo Acq 15% (95%)


Next Meeting

A teleconference was scheduled for Oct 31, 11am Central to address presentations for Radiology sessions at RSNA.

Another meeting will be scheduled to discuss:

  • IHE Domain Application Preparation
  • CoChair elections
Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Rad_Plan_Minutes_07.10.24&oldid=11753"