Difference between revisions of "XCA-I FT Evaluation"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
 
* Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
 
* Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
 
:: Yes. No issues
 
:: Yes. No issues
 +
* Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
  
 
===TC Conclusion===
 
===TC Conclusion===

Revision as of 12:10, 9 May 2013

XCA-I - Cross-Community Access for Imaging has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Chris Lindop)

Per the Final Text Process, Items in blue text below warrant Committee discussion.

TC Checklist

  • Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
Yes. Open CPs:
223 - Consistent SOAP definitions for XCA-I transactions
  • Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
Yes
ITI 650 OASIS/ebXML Registry Information Model constraint or IHE ITI TF Example change
  • Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
Yes.
  • Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
(Check with Lynn)
  • Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
Yes. No issues
  • Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?

TC Conclusion

PC Checklist

  • Put Final Text Decision on the planning committee agenda
    • Consider doing this a couple months before new TF version will be released so it can be incorporated.
    • It's helpful to assign an advocate for the supplement at this time to check/prepare the evidence for the upcoming checklist rather than go hunting for it during the meeting


  • Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
Yes. NA (2012, 2013) EU (2012, 2013)
  • Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
Yes. NA (2012, 2013) EU (2012, 2013)
  • Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
Yes. (9 vendors have tested various actors)
  • Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
(Check with Lynn)
  • Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
(Check with Lynn)
  • Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
Yes. (ITI XCA, XDS-I.b, (FTP) )
  • (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
Yes. 6 Products listed in Product Registry.
  • Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
(Discuss)
Chris Lindop will update.

PC Conclusion