Under assessement by planning
The IHE ITI domain has received work items proposals to be developed, see https://trello.com/b/IH4FPDhN
Some of them have been already selected to be developed, see Current development.
Others have been assessed, see Planning assessed work items.
The other work items proposals received are under assessement by planning. They are listed in the present page.
Mobile Sharing Value Sets (SVS using FHIR)
Terminologies stored in value sets are most useful when they are widely shared and standardized across geography and disciplines to add clarity and pecificity. The IHE ITI Sharing Value Sets (SVS) profile currently solves that problem, however a FHIR-based approach to Sharing Value Sets would allow simpler, and more standardized use of FHIR terminology tools, including the FHIR Terminology Service and Value Sets.
=Survey of network interfaces form (SNIF)=
It is time consuming and difficult to get simple clear answers to basic information about interfaces or web services in use at a healthcare organization.
This profile provides a consistent way for all organizations to provide this information would allow people to easily compare what is available for review and also would allow systems to directly connect.
Each healthcare organization can securely publish a list of available or pending network interfaces. This information can be electronically queried and then reviewed by people. It can also be used by systems to directly connect or to populate connectivity information into configuration files.
A consistent way of presenting the information would allow users to easily see what is in use at an institution and allow systems to automate connections. This profile is a content profile that specifies the information and provides that a creator and consumer.
Re-Document XDS Metadata Update
Now that we have Restricted Metadata Update TF supplement (RMU) for Trial Implementation, what would XDS Metadata Update TF supplement, also for Trial Implementation, look like if we re-started today? Might it be a standalone profile rather than options on XDS? Might it be updates to RMU?
Potential New Work Items - not proposed
The following is a list of things that have been spoken about, but for which we have not received a formal new work item proposal
- XDM on FHIR -- usecases from XDM, but where the encoding of the metadata is using FHIR structure
- Could extend to carrying non-Document resources on portable media
- https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/65-ihe/topic/FHIR.20based.20XDM
- MHD asynchronous -- usecases from MHD, but where there is a need for asynchronous. Such as MHD as an API to XCA where the asynchronous MHD would allow for non-blocking
- FHIR Client security -- package up the requirements for a FHIR Client to be secure. Subset of ATNA without client side cert + IUA +???
- SMART-on-FHIR usecases -- authorization of application space, specification of OAuth scope, specification of OAuth interaction (beyond IUA has today)
- SMART-on-FHIR is about to be published as normative STU from HL7
- Must deal with SMART-on-FHIR overlap. Is there anything to profile? Can we just reference SMART?
- FHIR Maturity for MHD and other profiles -- some of the FHIR resources are not being naturally matured, where as IHE may be the best organization to focus on that (e.g. MHD)
- DocumentReference and DocumentManifest -- need IHE to help them progress through the FMM levels.
- DocumentManifest needs introduction, scope, etc
- Both need testing proof etc.
- MHD On-Demand -- document how MHD would support On-Demand -- where backend is XDS, where backend is XCA, where backend is native FHIR
- PAM on FHIR -- all of the PAM use-cases in FHIR form
- Re-Document ITI-18 -- simplify, clarify, various items Thing ONE
- Work more closely with PCC and QRPH to align their newest work with ITI
- Work toward a more continuous release structure vs the yearly schedule we now have
- Profiling of CDS-hooks for specific clinical usecases. Or does this become a clinical domain responsibility (PCC, etc)
- Provider Directory maturity
- Alignment with Argonaut
- Alignment with Sequoia Directory
- Alignment with DirectTrust.org Directory
- Overall alignment of our FHIR profiles with Argonaut and/or Da Vinci
- Add in Sequoia - CareQuality -- Point-of-Care Consent mechanism to XCPD and XCA
See Also
- Return to ITI Planning Committee
- Return to IT Infrastructure domain page
- --