Difference between revisions of "Talk:Patient Care Device"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Talk:Patient Care Devices moved to Talk:Patient Care Device: Corrected domain name)
(add)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
To the extent we use similar conventions, it's easier to find things.
 
To the extent we use similar conventions, it's easier to find things.
 
--[[User:Kevino|Kevino]] 15:01, 8 November 2007 (CST)
 
--[[User:Kevino|Kevino]] 15:01, 8 November 2007 (CST)
 +
 +
== 2016 - updates needed! ==
 +
 +
[[PCD Proposals]] is kind of ghastly
 +
 +
There are more stale, stale pages. Search and upgrade or search and destroy.
 +
 +
Consider striving for a more readable and attractive overall format
 +
----[[User:jrhoads|John Rhoads]

Latest revision as of 18:25, 10 March 2016

This page is for moderator discussions -

The previous page has been moved here: PCD COMMENTS ON DRAFT IHE GOVERNANCE DOCUMENT IN PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD --Bikram 15:47, 24 October 2007 (CDT)


Today I added a personal references page, Todd Cooper. Please link to this when you add the membership list, etc. -- At the right time we should probably send out an e-mail and ask PCD members to create a user profile and then update the membership list with their links. This would especially help those who are coming into the group and are trying to figure out who is who. --Todd Cooper 12:40, 7 November 2007 (CST)

Med Dev Security Discussion

BTW - Reviewing my notes from the recent F2F, we indicated that there should be a discussion added to the wiki re. medical device connectivity secrity issues. This is both the general PCD discussion that we have had in the past + the IHE perspective (there are a set of security framework profiles in the ITI) + our roadmap, etc. --Todd Cooper 15:10, 2 November 2007 (CDT)

Update Schedule & Profiles & Roadmap per Updated Docs

Could we do a quick update on this front page with the new info for the schedule (minutes from yesterday's PC TCon ... updated after the call) + profile selection (from the 2007-10 F2F) and Roadmap (update post the F2F)? That would be good since people start here to get info about PCD activities and status. --Todd Cooper 14:32, 8 November 2007 (CST)


For what it's worth, a number of domains seem to use the structure of:

To the extent we use similar conventions, it's easier to find things. --Kevino 15:01, 8 November 2007 (CST)

2016 - updates needed!

PCD Proposals is kind of ghastly

There are more stale, stale pages. Search and upgrade or search and destroy.

Consider striving for a more readable and attractive overall format


[[User:jrhoads|John Rhoads]