Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mobile access to Health Documents - Supplement revision 2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JohnMoehrke (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=February 28, 2014= attendees: * John Moehrke * Bill Majurski * Eric Heflin * Mauro Zanardini * Rob Horn * Gila Pyke Topics: * Reveal Wiki page and work through operating mechan...") |
JohnMoehrke (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | =September 12, 2014 = | ||
+ | attendees: | ||
+ | * John Moehrke | ||
+ | * Bill Majurski | ||
+ | * Justin Fyfe | ||
+ | * Karen Witting | ||
+ | * Dragon | ||
+ | * Sungkee Lee | ||
+ | * Walco van Loon | ||
+ | * Ben Kraufmann | ||
+ | * Lynn Felhofer | ||
+ | |||
+ | Notes | ||
+ | * Justin | ||
+ | ** will be able to provide a few hours a week under a new contract he has with OpenHIE | ||
+ | ** Will be at HL7 FHIR Hackathon | ||
+ | * John has gotten no progress | ||
+ | ** Will be at HL7 FHIR Hackathon | ||
+ | * Bill | ||
+ | ** has been working on a few of the key difficult attributes and how to translate (e.g. URI) | ||
+ | ** Working on the example. Need to validate that it fits spec, and that spec fits the example | ||
+ | *** We can rely on the HL7 FHIR code-base to do the XML to JSON format translations | ||
+ | *** concept of "code first". Try to have a reference system and test tooling, that will help drive spec accuracy | ||
+ | *** cleaning up the wiki page for attribute mapping | ||
+ | ** Will not be at Hackathon, but will be at HL7 meeting | ||
+ | * Walco | ||
+ | ** has been working on the Provide transaction | ||
+ | ** Not liking the Mailbox model, likely will end up using it | ||
+ | ** Concern around FHIR principle of everything being a referencable | ||
+ | *** Discussion: We can and should use the 'contained' concept of FHIR when we really need it (e.g. PatientSourceInfo) | ||
+ | ** Mailbox issues | ||
+ | *** it is a very underspecified thing | ||
+ | *** therefore conformance is really only testable with a profile | ||
+ | *** note we can add transactional behaviors to core mailbox behavior | ||
+ | *** What is the difference between Transaction and Mailbox? | ||
+ | **** Walco: Message exchange pattern (messaging, REST, mailbox) | ||
+ | *** John: I think there is a concept of "Transaction" that is being developed. It is not well exposed to the broader community. | ||
+ | *** John: Lets just focus on Mailbox only as a way to allow us to focus on the bundle content and encoding inside the transaction. We will likely use a totally newly invented URL for our Provide endpoint. It will have as many characteristics from FHIR as we can take, but will not likely be a FHIR endpoint. | ||
+ | ** Will work on the Provide trasaction. Focus first on the bundle content profiling. secondary on HTTP transactional characteristics. | ||
+ | * Gila has forwarded the shortened MHD supplement to Mary for publication on the external www.ihe.net web site. | ||
+ | |||
=February 28, 2014= | =February 28, 2014= | ||
attendees: | attendees: |
Revision as of 08:49, 12 September 2014
September 12, 2014
attendees:
- John Moehrke
- Bill Majurski
- Justin Fyfe
- Karen Witting
- Dragon
- Sungkee Lee
- Walco van Loon
- Ben Kraufmann
- Lynn Felhofer
Notes
- Justin
- will be able to provide a few hours a week under a new contract he has with OpenHIE
- Will be at HL7 FHIR Hackathon
- John has gotten no progress
- Will be at HL7 FHIR Hackathon
- Bill
- has been working on a few of the key difficult attributes and how to translate (e.g. URI)
- Working on the example. Need to validate that it fits spec, and that spec fits the example
- We can rely on the HL7 FHIR code-base to do the XML to JSON format translations
- concept of "code first". Try to have a reference system and test tooling, that will help drive spec accuracy
- cleaning up the wiki page for attribute mapping
- Will not be at Hackathon, but will be at HL7 meeting
- Walco
- has been working on the Provide transaction
- Not liking the Mailbox model, likely will end up using it
- Concern around FHIR principle of everything being a referencable
- Discussion: We can and should use the 'contained' concept of FHIR when we really need it (e.g. PatientSourceInfo)
- Mailbox issues
- it is a very underspecified thing
- therefore conformance is really only testable with a profile
- note we can add transactional behaviors to core mailbox behavior
- What is the difference between Transaction and Mailbox?
- Walco: Message exchange pattern (messaging, REST, mailbox)
- John: I think there is a concept of "Transaction" that is being developed. It is not well exposed to the broader community.
- John: Lets just focus on Mailbox only as a way to allow us to focus on the bundle content and encoding inside the transaction. We will likely use a totally newly invented URL for our Provide endpoint. It will have as many characteristics from FHIR as we can take, but will not likely be a FHIR endpoint.
- Will work on the Provide trasaction. Focus first on the bundle content profiling. secondary on HTTP transactional characteristics.
- Gila has forwarded the shortened MHD supplement to Mary for publication on the external www.ihe.net web site.
February 28, 2014
attendees:
- John Moehrke
- Bill Majurski
- Eric Heflin
- Mauro Zanardini
- Rob Horn
- Gila Pyke
Topics:
- Reveal Wiki page and work through operating mechanism
- Attribute Mapping - Bill
- Author cardionality mismatch
- might be deeper solution
- architecture difference
- Bill to post link to google document he is using for tracking
- analysis doing broad assessment first, starting with XDS focus
- Author cardionality mismatch
- Scope - John
- have not done
- Provenance Resource - Rob
- has looked at W3C provenance.
- Primer http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-primer/
- Model: http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/
- this looks usable by MHD
- They use this for associations and lifecycle
- Multi-Node edges is a concept in W3C provenance that could be useful in medicine
- Not clear this is the same as FHIR
- has looked at W3C provenance.
- Transport Pattern -- Walco
- Noted FHIR has concept of many transports, but HTTP REST is only one clear
- looking into other
- Will focus on Publishing including multiple documents and submission sets.
- should also look into defining this simply as a service that invokes FHIR resources
- Note that a "Profiling" tool is being developed. Not clear if it is accepted inside of HL7 FHIR yet.
- FHIR vs IHE lifecycle
- See W3C discussion