Difference between revisions of "Talk:Emergency Department Encounter Record"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 17: Line 17:
 
# Content vetted by full [[Patient_Care_Coordination]] Technical Committee.<br/>
 
# Content vetted by full [[Patient_Care_Coordination]] Technical Committee.<br/>
 
# The EDER is a multi-authored (but singly attested?) document. How should this best be implemented/reflected: Document to be attested to by ED attending physician.<br/>
 
# The EDER is a multi-authored (but singly attested?) document. How should this best be implemented/reflected: Document to be attested to by ED attending physician.<br/>
 +
=== TCON 04-05-2007 ===
 +
; Attending: Rich Hardell, Wellsoft; Benjamin Greco, Wellsoft; Todd Rothehhouse; Keith W. Boone

Revision as of 14:43, 5 April 2007

Issue Log

Open Issues

  1. Patients frequently leave the ED prior to documentation being finalized. Triggers in workflow vary. How should the Draft vs. Final Status be handled?
  2. Potential for multiple entries.
  3. Timetable for CCD harmonization?
  4. Target systems discussion.
    1. EDIS  CDR  RHIO
    2. EDIS  RHIO  Ambulatory EHR
    3. EDIS  Ambulatory EHR
  5. Potential need for LOINC codes for new elements.
  6. Use of Co-occurrence Constraint [Conditional Restraint] for Disposition elements.
  7. Snomed vs. DEEDS for Disposition?

Closed Issues

  1. Content vetted by full Patient_Care_Coordination Technical Committee.
  2. The EDER is a multi-authored (but singly attested?) document. How should this best be implemented/reflected: Document to be attested to by ED attending physician.

TCON 04-05-2007

Attending
Rich Hardell, Wellsoft; Benjamin Greco, Wellsoft; Todd Rothehhouse; Keith W. Boone