Difference between revisions of "Talk:1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.7.3"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: {{Fixme | The example has <entryRelationship type='REFR' ... > when the attribute name should be "typeCode". }} {{Fixme | In the example, the closing tag to the top level entryRel...) |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | The example has <entryRelationship type='REFR' ... > when the attribute name should be "typeCode". | + | === Fixed: 09:07, 3 October 2008 (CDT) [[User:Kboone|Kboone]] === |
+ | Changed type to typeCode<br/> | ||
+ | :The example has <entryRelationship type='REFR' ... > when the attribute name should be "typeCode". | ||
+ | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | In the example, the closing tag to the top level entryRelationship is | + | |
+ | === Fixed: 09:07, 3 October 2008 (CDT) [[User:Kboone|Kboone]] === | ||
+ | Fixed closing tag<br/> | ||
+ | :In the example, the closing tag to the top level entryRelationship is | ||
<entryRelationship> when it should be </entryRelationship>. | <entryRelationship> when it should be </entryRelationship>. | ||
+ | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | In one place, I believe the example is correct while the lower passage is incorrect. The requirement for <templateId | + | |
+ | === Fixed: 09:07, 3 October 2008 (CDT) [[User:Kboone|Kboone]] === | ||
+ | Placed templateId on supply act to remain concistent with CCD<br/> | ||
+ | :In one place, I believe the example is correct while the lower passage is incorrect. The requirement for <templateId | ||
root='1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.7.3'/> being present is listed twice. One place states that it shall appear under <entryRelationship>. Later it states that it must also appear under <supply>. I'm guessing that that example is correct when it lists that templateId only under <entryRelationship>. | root='1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.7.3'/> being present is listed twice. One place states that it shall appear under <entryRelationship>. Later it states that it must also appear under <supply>. I'm guessing that that example is correct when it lists that templateId only under <entryRelationship>. | ||
If, however, that template ID is indeed supposed to be attached to both the <entryRelationship> and the <supply>, then it is the example that is missing a template ID. | If, however, that template ID is indeed supposed to be attached to both the <entryRelationship> and the <supply>, then it is the example that is missing a template ID. | ||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 09:07, 3 October 2008
Fixed: 09:07, 3 October 2008 (CDT) Kboone
Changed type to typeCode
- The example has <entryRelationship type='REFR' ... > when the attribute name should be "typeCode".
Fixed: 09:07, 3 October 2008 (CDT) Kboone
Fixed closing tag
- In the example, the closing tag to the top level entryRelationship is
<entryRelationship> when it should be </entryRelationship>.
Fixed: 09:07, 3 October 2008 (CDT) Kboone
Placed templateId on supply act to remain concistent with CCD
- In one place, I believe the example is correct while the lower passage is incorrect. The requirement for <templateId
root='1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.7.3'/> being present is listed twice. One place states that it shall appear under <entryRelationship>. Later it states that it must also appear under <supply>. I'm guessing that that example is correct when it lists that templateId only under <entryRelationship>.
If, however, that template ID is indeed supposed to be attached to both the <entryRelationship> and the <supply>, then it is the example that is missing a template ID.