Difference between revisions of "Talk:1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.7.3"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
(Minor issue: Example had minor CDA R2 schema issue.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
=== Fixed: 09:07, 3 October 2008 (CDT) [[User:Kboone|Kboone]] ===
 
=== Fixed: 09:07, 3 October 2008 (CDT) [[User:Kboone|Kboone]] ===
 
Changed type to typeCode<br/>
 
Changed type to typeCode<br/>
Line 23: Line 22:
  
 
If, however, that template ID is indeed supposed to be attached to both the <entryRelationship> and the <supply>, then it is the example that is missing a template ID.
 
If, however, that template ID is indeed supposed to be attached to both the <entryRelationship> and the <supply>, then it is the example that is missing a template ID.
 +
 +
 +
=== March 25, 2009 ===
 +
 +
{{Fixme | Minor issue: In example, performer should be above author sibling to conform with CDA R2 schema. }}

Latest revision as of 11:35, 25 March 2009

Fixed: 09:07, 3 October 2008 (CDT) Kboone

Changed type to typeCode

The example has <entryRelationship type='REFR' ... > when the attribute name should be "typeCode".



Fixed: 09:07, 3 October 2008 (CDT) Kboone

Fixed closing tag

In the example, the closing tag to the top level entryRelationship is

<entryRelationship> when it should be </entryRelationship>.



Fixed: 09:07, 3 October 2008 (CDT) Kboone

Placed templateId on supply act to remain concistent with CCD

In one place, I believe the example is correct while the lower passage is incorrect. The requirement for <templateId

root='1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.7.3'/> being present is listed twice. One place states that it shall appear under <entryRelationship>. Later it states that it must also appear under <supply>. I'm guessing that that example is correct when it lists that templateId only under <entryRelationship>.

If, however, that template ID is indeed supposed to be attached to both the <entryRelationship> and the <supply>, then it is the example that is missing a template ID.


March 25, 2009

This text needs to be fixed-->> Minor issue: In example, performer should be above author sibling to conform with CDA R2 schema. <<--