Difference between revisions of "Talk:1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.15"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Added an issue.)
m
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Fixme |
 
  
(This is more of a request for more information than a bug report.)
+
=== Fixed: 17:25, 2 October 2008 (CDT) [[User:Kboone|Kboone]] ===
 +
Added documentation for sdtc:id<br/>
 +
:(This is more of a request for more information than a bug report.)
  
 
This entry makes use of an <sdtc:id> element which is an extension to CDA R2.  However [[Extensions to HL7 CDA Release 2.0|Appendix C of PCC-TF]] which defines the extensions to CDA R2 doesn't mention the use of <sdtc:id> as a child of <cda:subject> or <cda:playingEntity> (just as a child of <sdtc:patient>).  Could we have more information on how this extension is defined (or a link to where that definition occurs)?  Thanks.
 
This entry makes use of an <sdtc:id> element which is an extension to CDA R2.  However [[Extensions to HL7 CDA Release 2.0|Appendix C of PCC-TF]] which defines the extensions to CDA R2 doesn't mention the use of <sdtc:id> as a child of <cda:subject> or <cda:playingEntity> (just as a child of <sdtc:patient>).  Could we have more information on how this extension is defined (or a link to where that definition occurs)?  Thanks.
 +
  
}}
 
  
{{Fixme |
 
  
If subject is of type ParticipationTargetSubject, then to be compatible with CDA R2, the typeCode of subject should be SBJ not SUBJ.
+
=== Fixed: 17:25, 2 October 2008 (CDT) [[User:Kboone|Kboone]] ===
 +
Changed to SBJ<br/>
 +
:If subject is of type ParticipationTargetSubject, then to be compatible with CDA R2, the typeCode of subject should be SBJ not SUBJ.
  
}}
+
  
{{Fixme |
+
 
 +
 
 +
=== Fixed: 17:25, 2 October 2008 (CDT) [[User:Kboone|Kboone]] ===
 +
Changed entryRelationship to component<br/>
 +
:
  
 
"The family history organizer shall contain one or more components using the <entryRelationship> element shown above."
 
"The family history organizer shall contain one or more components using the <entryRelationship> element shown above."
  
 
However, entryRelationship is not a legal element for an organizer.  To retain the COMP typeCode, we suggest that <component> be used here in place of <entryRelationship>.  (This may have been the original intent.)
 
However, entryRelationship is not a legal element for an organizer.  To retain the COMP typeCode, we suggest that <component> be used here in place of <entryRelationship>.  (This may have been the original intent.)
 
}}
 

Latest revision as of 16:25, 2 October 2008

Fixed: 17:25, 2 October 2008 (CDT) Kboone

Added documentation for sdtc:id

(This is more of a request for more information than a bug report.)

This entry makes use of an <sdtc:id> element which is an extension to CDA R2. However Appendix C of PCC-TF which defines the extensions to CDA R2 doesn't mention the use of <sdtc:id> as a child of <cda:subject> or <cda:playingEntity> (just as a child of <sdtc:patient>). Could we have more information on how this extension is defined (or a link to where that definition occurs)? Thanks.



Fixed: 17:25, 2 October 2008 (CDT) Kboone

Changed to SBJ

If subject is of type ParticipationTargetSubject, then to be compatible with CDA R2, the typeCode of subject should be SBJ not SUBJ.



Fixed: 17:25, 2 October 2008 (CDT) Kboone

Changed entryRelationship to component

"The family history organizer shall contain one or more components using the <entryRelationship> element shown above."

However, entryRelationship is not a legal element for an organizer. To retain the COMP typeCode, we suggest that <component> be used here in place of <entryRelationship>. (This may have been the original intent.)