Difference between revisions of "Talk:1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.15"
(Added a request...) |
m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | (This is more of a request for more information than a bug report.) | + | === Fixed: 17:25, 2 October 2008 (CDT) [[User:Kboone|Kboone]] === |
| + | Added documentation for sdtc:id<br/> | ||
| + | :(This is more of a request for more information than a bug report.) | ||
This entry makes use of an <sdtc:id> element which is an extension to CDA R2. However [[Extensions to HL7 CDA Release 2.0|Appendix C of PCC-TF]] which defines the extensions to CDA R2 doesn't mention the use of <sdtc:id> as a child of <cda:subject> or <cda:playingEntity> (just as a child of <sdtc:patient>). Could we have more information on how this extension is defined (or a link to where that definition occurs)? Thanks. | This entry makes use of an <sdtc:id> element which is an extension to CDA R2. However [[Extensions to HL7 CDA Release 2.0|Appendix C of PCC-TF]] which defines the extensions to CDA R2 doesn't mention the use of <sdtc:id> as a child of <cda:subject> or <cda:playingEntity> (just as a child of <sdtc:patient>). Could we have more information on how this extension is defined (or a link to where that definition occurs)? Thanks. | ||
| + | |||
| − | + | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Fixed: 17:25, 2 October 2008 (CDT) [[User:Kboone|Kboone]] === | ||
| + | Changed to SBJ<br/> | ||
| + | :If subject is of type ParticipationTargetSubject, then to be compatible with CDA R2, the typeCode of subject should be SBJ not SUBJ. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | === Fixed: 17:25, 2 October 2008 (CDT) [[User:Kboone|Kboone]] === | ||
| + | Changed entryRelationship to component<br/> | ||
| + | : | ||
| + | |||
| + | "The family history organizer shall contain one or more components using the <entryRelationship> element shown above." | ||
| + | |||
| + | However, entryRelationship is not a legal element for an organizer. To retain the COMP typeCode, we suggest that <component> be used here in place of <entryRelationship>. (This may have been the original intent.) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:25, 2 October 2008
Fixed: 17:25, 2 October 2008 (CDT) Kboone
Added documentation for sdtc:id
- (This is more of a request for more information than a bug report.)
This entry makes use of an <sdtc:id> element which is an extension to CDA R2. However Appendix C of PCC-TF which defines the extensions to CDA R2 doesn't mention the use of <sdtc:id> as a child of <cda:subject> or <cda:playingEntity> (just as a child of <sdtc:patient>). Could we have more information on how this extension is defined (or a link to where that definition occurs)? Thanks.
Fixed: 17:25, 2 October 2008 (CDT) Kboone
Changed to SBJ
- If subject is of type ParticipationTargetSubject, then to be compatible with CDA R2, the typeCode of subject should be SBJ not SUBJ.
Fixed: 17:25, 2 October 2008 (CDT) Kboone
Changed entryRelationship to component
"The family history organizer shall contain one or more components using the <entryRelationship> element shown above."
However, entryRelationship is not a legal element for an organizer. To retain the COMP typeCode, we suggest that <component> be used here in place of <entryRelationship>. (This may have been the original intent.)