Difference between revisions of "Talk:1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.1.11.2.3.1"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Minor issue: minor error in sample XML.)
 
(Issue: Use of "DRIV" typecode in the entry relationship to the nested derived observation violates CDA R2...)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Fixme | Minor issue:  <templateId root='1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.1.11.2.3.1'> is missing closing tag }}
+
{{Fixme | Minor issue:  <templateId root='1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.1.11.2.3.1'> is missing closing tag in sample. }}
 +
 
 +
{{Fixme | Minor issue: Second <value type='TS' value=' '> is missing closing tag in sample.  Also, type is missing "xsi" prefix.}}
 +
 
 +
{{Fixme | Minor issue: The following is in the sample:
 +
<blockquote>
 +
          &lt;relatedEntity classCode&#61;' '><br />
 +
            &lt;id root&#61;' ' extension&#61;' '/><br />
 +
          &lt;/relatedEntity>
 +
</blockquote>
 +
However this violates CDA R2 schema which does not allow for an id element for relatedEntity.
 +
}}
 +
 
 +
{{Fixme | Minor issue: &lt;value type&#61;'[PQ TS]' value&#61;' ' units&#61;'week'/> is missing the "xsi" prefix on type parameter.  (See above.) Also, "units" should be singular "unit". }}
 +
 
 +
{{Fixme | Issue: The use of the "derived" type code in the entry relationship to the nested observation violates CDA R2 schema.  "Value 'DRIV' is not facet-valid with respect to enumeration '[XCRPT, COMP, RSON, SPRT, CAUS, GEVL, MFST, REFR, SAS, SUBJ]'." }}

Latest revision as of 14:04, 3 December 2008

This text needs to be fixed-->> Minor issue: <templateId root='1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.1.11.2.3.1'> is missing closing tag in sample. <<--

This text needs to be fixed-->> Minor issue: Second <value type='TS' value=' '> is missing closing tag in sample. Also, type is missing "xsi" prefix.<<--

This text needs to be fixed-->> Minor issue: The following is in the sample:

<relatedEntity classCode=' '>
<id root=' ' extension=' '/>
</relatedEntity>

However this violates CDA R2 schema which does not allow for an id element for relatedEntity. <<--

This text needs to be fixed-->> Minor issue: <value type='[PQ TS]' value=' ' units='week'/> is missing the "xsi" prefix on type parameter. (See above.) Also, "units" should be singular "unit". <<--

This text needs to be fixed-->> Issue: The use of the "derived" type code in the entry relationship to the nested observation violates CDA R2 schema. "Value 'DRIV' is not facet-valid with respect to enumeration '[XCRPT, COMP, RSON, SPRT, CAUS, GEVL, MFST, REFR, SAS, SUBJ]'." <<--