Difference between revisions of "Sharing Value Sets"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Discussion and comments)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
===Discussion and comments===
 
===Discussion and comments===
 
Current discussion and comments can be posted on [[Sharing of Value Set - Discussion]].
 
Current discussion and comments can be posted on [[Sharing of Value Set - Discussion]].
 +
 +
Following the French meeting on April 28th, the French group has commented on the fact that having a Registry would be recommended since it would provide two things:
 +
1) taking in charge of the value set versioning, what CTS1 doesn't.
 +
2) enable the user to make more flexible queries.
 +
 
==Previous Work==
 
==Previous Work==
 
The version after the March face-to-face meeting is at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/iheitiyr6-2008-2009/Technical_Cmte/Profile_Work/SharingValueSets/IHE_Supp_ITI_Sharing-Value-Sets_following_f2f_March17_2008b.doc
 
The version after the March face-to-face meeting is at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/iheitiyr6-2008-2009/Technical_Cmte/Profile_Work/SharingValueSets/IHE_Supp_ITI_Sharing-Value-Sets_following_f2f_March17_2008b.doc
  
 
The original eleborated proposal can be found under the discussion under [[Talk:Sharing Value Sets]].  Please note that this proposal has changed considerably since the first time proposed.
 
The original eleborated proposal can be found under the discussion under [[Talk:Sharing Value Sets]].  Please note that this proposal has changed considerably since the first time proposed.

Revision as of 08:22, 19 May 2008

Current Work

Draft

The current version of the profile draft is at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/iheitiyr6-2008-2009/Technical_Cmte/Profile_Work/SharingValueSets/IHE_Supp_ITI_Sharing-Value-Sets_April18_2008.doc

Examples

Transaction examples, and proposed schema and WSDL files are at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/iheitiyr6-2008-2009/Technical_Cmte/Profile_Work/SharingValueSets/SVS_April18.zip

Discussion and comments

Current discussion and comments can be posted on Sharing of Value Set - Discussion.

Following the French meeting on April 28th, the French group has commented on the fact that having a Registry would be recommended since it would provide two things: 1) taking in charge of the value set versioning, what CTS1 doesn't. 2) enable the user to make more flexible queries.

Previous Work

The version after the March face-to-face meeting is at ftp://ftp.ihe.net/IT_Infrastructure/iheitiyr6-2008-2009/Technical_Cmte/Profile_Work/SharingValueSets/IHE_Supp_ITI_Sharing-Value-Sets_following_f2f_March17_2008b.doc

The original eleborated proposal can be found under the discussion under Talk:Sharing Value Sets. Please note that this proposal has changed considerably since the first time proposed.