Difference between revisions of "SWF.b FT Evaluation"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Proposal)
(Technical Committee Checklist)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
* Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
 
* Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
 
:* See above
 
:* See above
 +
 +
== Technical Committee Consensus==
 +
:* The Technical Committee agreed to continue with the Final Text Process and continue with an evaluation by the Planning Committee

Revision as of 08:03, 14 November 2019

Proposal

The Scheduled Workflow.b profile has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Steve Nichols) Per the Final Text Process, Items in blue text below warrant Committee discussion.

Technical Committee Checklist

  • Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
  • Steve to add
  • Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
  • Steve to add
  • Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
  • Yes
  • Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
  • Steve to add
  • Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
  • After checking with Lynn Felhofer, all connectathon issues have been addressed through CPs
  • See above
  • Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
  • See above

Technical Committee Consensus

  • The Technical Committee agreed to continue with the Final Text Process and continue with an evaluation by the Planning Committee