Difference between revisions of "SWF.b FT Evaluation"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "==Proposal== The Scheduled Workflow.b profile has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Steve Nichols) Per the Final Text Process, <font color="blue">It...")
 
(Proposal)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
The Scheduled Workflow.b profile has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Steve Nichols)
 
The Scheduled Workflow.b profile has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Steve Nichols)
 
Per the [[Final Text Process]], <font color="blue">Items in blue text</font> below warrant Committee discussion.
 
Per the [[Final Text Process]], <font color="blue">Items in blue text</font> below warrant Committee discussion.
 +
 +
== Technical Committee Checklist ==
 +
 +
* Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
 +
:* Steve to add
 +
* Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
 +
:* Steve to add
 +
* Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
 +
:* Yes
 +
* Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
 +
:* Steve to add
 +
* Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
 +
:* After checking with Lynn Felhofer, all connectathon issues have been addressed through CPs
 +
* Gather feedback from implementers via a [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Connectathon/IHE%20Vendor%20Questionnaire%20V0.4.doc formal questionnaire to Connectathon participants]
 +
:* See above
 +
* Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
 +
:* See above

Revision as of 08:02, 14 November 2019

Proposal

The Scheduled Workflow.b profile has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Steve Nichols) Per the Final Text Process, Items in blue text below warrant Committee discussion.

Technical Committee Checklist

  • Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
  • Steve to add
  • Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
  • Steve to add
  • Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
  • Yes
  • Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
  • Steve to add
  • Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
  • After checking with Lynn Felhofer, all connectathon issues have been addressed through CPs
  • See above
  • Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
  • See above