Difference between revisions of "Radiology Proposals 2010-2011"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
===Final Selection===
 +
 +
The Planning Committee selected the following 2010-11 work items during the [[Rad Plan Minutes 2010-10-27|Oct 27 T-Con]] :
 +
:* [[Management of Radiology Report Templates - Detailed Proposal]] (exchange of templates only)
 +
:* [[Imaging Object Quality Control and Maintenance - Detailed Proposal]]
 +
:* [[Cross-Community Access - Images (XCA-I) - Detailed  Proposal]]
 +
:* [[Rad TF Maintenance 2010-11| TF Maintenance]]
 +
     
 +
Work will begin at the Nov 16-18 face to face meeting of the Tech Cmte at RSNA HQ in Oak Brook.
 +
 +
 +
{| style="width:70%" border="1" cellpadding="4"
 +
! Proposals under Consideration                                  !! Editor      !! Effort !! Tag
 +
|-
 +
| [[Management of Radiology Report Templates - Detailed Proposal]]|| C. Langlotz  ||        ||
 +
|-
 +
| - - address exchange of templates only                          ||              || 20%    || A1
 +
|-
 +
| - - also address discovery/monitoring (Query, Pub/Sub, etc)    ||              || +20%  || A2
 +
|-
 +
| [[Imaging Object Quality Control and Maintenance - Detailed Proposal]]|| K. Ho  || 35%    || B
 +
|-
 +
| [[Reporting Workflow Revision - Detailed Proposal]]            || K. O'Donnell || 40%    || C
 +
|-
 +
| [[Cross-Community Access - Images (XCA-I) - Detailed  Proposal]]|| C. Lindop    || 30%    || D
 +
|-
 +
| [[Rad TF Maintenance 2010-11]]                                  || CoChairs    || 20%    || E
 +
|}
 +
 +
The following "slates of work" were put forward, each listing a group of proposals and the estimated Tech Cmte bandwith.  Slates significantly over 100% must indicate which proposal is "below the line" (meaning it can be dropped/delayed if the Tech Cmte runs into bandwidth problems).  Rad TF Maintenance 20% is required.
 +
 +
Slate 1 - A1 B D E = 105%
 +
 +
Slate 2 - A1 (A2) B D E  = 125%
 +
 +
Slate 3 - B D E = 85%
 +
 +
Slate 4 - (A1) B C E = 115%
 +
 +
Slate 5 - A1 C (D) E = 110%
 +
 +
Slate 6 - A1 A2 B E = 95%
 +
 +
 +
Slate 1 received more than half the votes in the first ballot.
 +
 +
 
===Detailed Proposals===
 
===Detailed Proposals===
 
The following detailed proposals are being prepared for evaluation by the Technical Cmte.  
 
The following detailed proposals are being prepared for evaluation by the Technical Cmte.  
Line 11: Line 58:
 
* [[Management of Radiology Report Templates - Detailed Proposal]]
 
* [[Management of Radiology Report Templates - Detailed Proposal]]
 
* [[Reporting Workflow Revision - Detailed Proposal]]
 
* [[Reporting Workflow Revision - Detailed Proposal]]
* [[SWF-Image Exchange option - Detailed Proposal]]
+
* [[SWF-Image Exchange option - Detailed Proposal]] (dropped due to lack of detailed proposal at Oct 22nd call)
 
 
  
 
Editors: To convert your Brief Proposal to a Detailed Proposal:
 
Editors: To convert your Brief Proposal to a Detailed Proposal:
Line 43: Line 89:
  
 
[[Radiology Planning Committee]]
 
[[Radiology Planning Committee]]
 +
 
[[Radiology Technical Committee]]
 
[[Radiology Technical Committee]]

Latest revision as of 13:27, 27 October 2010

Final Selection

The Planning Committee selected the following 2010-11 work items during the Oct 27 T-Con :

Work will begin at the Nov 16-18 face to face meeting of the Tech Cmte at RSNA HQ in Oak Brook.


Proposals under Consideration Editor Effort Tag
Management of Radiology Report Templates - Detailed Proposal C. Langlotz
- - address exchange of templates only 20% A1
- - also address discovery/monitoring (Query, Pub/Sub, etc) +20% A2
Imaging Object Quality Control and Maintenance - Detailed Proposal K. Ho 35% B
Reporting Workflow Revision - Detailed Proposal K. O'Donnell 40% C
Cross-Community Access - Images (XCA-I) - Detailed Proposal C. Lindop 30% D
Rad TF Maintenance 2010-11 CoChairs 20% E

The following "slates of work" were put forward, each listing a group of proposals and the estimated Tech Cmte bandwith. Slates significantly over 100% must indicate which proposal is "below the line" (meaning it can be dropped/delayed if the Tech Cmte runs into bandwidth problems). Rad TF Maintenance 20% is required.

Slate 1 - A1 B D E = 105%

Slate 2 - A1 (A2) B D E = 125%

Slate 3 - B D E = 85%

Slate 4 - (A1) B C E = 115%

Slate 5 - A1 C (D) E = 110%

Slate 6 - A1 A2 B E = 95%


Slate 1 received more than half the votes in the first ballot.


Detailed Proposals

The following detailed proposals are being prepared for evaluation by the Technical Cmte.

Detailed Proposals for this first group are due Oct 3. to let Tech Cmte members review the contents prior to recording their evaluation results during the Oct 6th teleconference.

Detailed Proposals in this second group are due Oct 19. to let Tech Cmte members review the contents prior to recording their evaluation results during the Oct 22nd teleconference.

Editors: To convert your Brief Proposal to a Detailed Proposal:

  • Use the new link above (Changed "Brief" to "Detailed")
  • Copy your Brief proposal text into the new page (don't forget to save)
  • Copy the Delta Proposal Template into the bottom of the new page
  • Update as necessary
  • Your goal is to give sufficient detail for the Tech Cmte to be able to evaluate the technical feasibility and effort required.

Tech Cmte evaluations will be recorded at the bottom of each proposal.

Brief Proposals

The brief proposals listed below were submitted, reviewed on Sept 20 and those listed above were selected on Sept 23 for expansion to detailed proposals.

Call for Proposals

Interested parties were invited to submit proposal pages based on the Brief Proposal Template by Sept. 10, 2010.

See Also


Radiology Planning Committee

Radiology Technical Committee