Difference between revisions of "Radiology Pathology Concordance"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added FHIR category)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
''Your page name should simply be Full Profile Name with spaces, with capitals, without the acronym. e.g. Scheduled Workflow. so it provides a title to the page. You can redirect the acronym to the full named page if you like for bonus points.''
+
Radiology and Pathology Concordance (RPC) describes the creation of an integrated diagnostic report using discrete data elements, assessing concordance of data, and sharing the report to an EMR system.
  
−
 
−
''<IN ONE LINE, tell a user what the profile is about (including the acronym) so they can decide if they're on the right page.  Basically this should be the same sentence that appears on the [[Profiles]] catalog page>''
 
−
 
−
''e.g. Scheduled Workflow (SWF) integrates ordering, scheduling, imaging acquisition, storage and viewing for Radiology exams.''
 
  
 
__TOC__
 
__TOC__
Line 11: Line 7:
 
The Radiology and Pathology Concordance (RPC) Profile describes how discrete data elements  are collected from structured reports to create an integrated report, where concordance of results is assessed, and reports are shared to an EMR or system in use by a health facility.
 
The Radiology and Pathology Concordance (RPC) Profile describes how discrete data elements  are collected from structured reports to create an integrated report, where concordance of results is assessed, and reports are shared to an EMR or system in use by a health facility.
  
−
The integrated report would extract data from structured radiology and pathology reports, compare the extracted results and assign a score based on the concordance of the results which will be included in a new integrated report.
+
The integrated report would extract data from structured radiology and pathology reports, compare the extracted results and assign a score based on the concordance of the results which will be included in a new integrated report.
 +
 
 +
Use cases include the correlation of structured reporting data for Breast, Prostate and Thyroid cancers, as well as the use of integrated diagnostic reports for radiologist training, as well as a tool in MCC’s and Tumour Board discussions to support decision making for patient care.
  
 
==Benefits==
 
==Benefits==
−
''<If the profile can improve Cost, Safety, Quality or Efficiency then list the specific examples of that benefit (e.g. error reduction, increased throughput) and how they come about (e.g. SWF reduces patient errors due to mistyped demographics at the modality by transfering demographics electronically from the Order Filler).  Consider using a bullet list for readability.  Such benefits help users and vendors make the business case for the profile.  If the profile does not improve any aspect of Cost, Safety, Quality or Efficiency feel free to talk about something else here.>''
 
  
−
==Details==
+
*Connecting data from disparate radiology and pathology structured reports and automatically assessing concordance
 +
*Integrated reports can enable improved training for radiologists and assist in the decision making around treatment and patient care*
 +
*The automated correlation of radiology and pathology data can save time for clinicians and reduce potential for error
  
−
''<A few paragraphs, if appropriate, providing more details (mostly in user-speak, not tech-speak) on what the profile does and how it works.>''
 
−
 
−
''<If the user might be familiar with the mechanisms used by the profile, you can mention them here.  E.g. Evidence Documents is based on DICOM Structured Report (SR) Templates.>''
 
−
 
−
''<If the user might have an appreciation for the problems addressed in the profile, you can mention them here, but keep it short.  E.g. Mapping HL7 Order fields to DICOM Modality Worklist attributes can be inconsistent in the marketplace, so Scheduled Workflow provides vendors with more detailed instructions.>''
 
−
 
 
==Systems Affected==
 
==Systems Affected==
−
''<List (in user terms) the types of systems they might expect to have implemented actors from this profile, e.g. RIS, PACS, HIS, CAD Workstation, etc. and for each, how it would participate.>''
+
*EMRs
 +
*Laboratory Information Systems (LIS)
 +
*Radiology Information Systems (RIS)
  
−
* ''PACS systems may store, manage, and/or display Evidence Documents.''
 
−
* ''Display systems may query, retrieve and display Evidence Documents.''
 
−
* ''Reporting workstations may retrieve, process and include details from Evidence Documents in reports
 
  
 
'''Actors & Transactions:'''
 
'''Actors & Transactions:'''
−
 
−
''<Insert an actor-transaction diagram, and or list of Content Definitions>''
 
  
 
==Specification==
 
==Specification==
  
−
'''Profile Status:''' [[Comments| Final Text]] 
+
'''Profile Status:''' Trial Implementation
−
''<Replace "Final Text" with "Trial Implementation" or "Public Comment" as appropriate.>''
 
−
 
 
−
'''Documents:'''
 
−
 
 
−
''<Provide direct links to the specific volumes or supplements, and list the volume sections relevant to this profile.  This is a simple inventory of official normative and informative text.  If you would like to provide a reading guide or walkthrough of what is in each of the different sections for implementers or users, do that in the Profile FAQ or the Profile Implementation Page linked below.  If the profile uses transactions from multiple Tech. Frameworks, repeat the structure below.>''
 
  
−
[http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/index.cfm#radiology IHE Radiology Technical Framework:]
+
'''Document: [https://www.ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/PaLM/IHE_PaLM_Suppl_RPC.pdf RPC Supplement]  
−
:* [http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/ihe_tf_rev8.pdf Vol. 1] - Section 5 (SWF Profile)
 
−
:* [http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/ihe_tf_rev8-2.pdf Vol. 2] - Sections 4.8 to 4.10, 4.14 to 4.19, and 4.23
 
−
:* [http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/ihe_tf_rev8-3.pdf Vol. 3] - Appendix E
 
  
 
'''Underlying Standards:'''
 
'''Underlying Standards:'''
  
−
''<list all the standards on which the profile is based; if possible with links to sources>''
+
:* [https://www.hl7.org/fhir/overview.html| HL7 FHIR]
−
:* [http://dicom.nema.org DICOM]
 
−
:* [http://www.hl7.org HL7]
 
−
:* ...
 
  
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==
−
 
−
''<The following sections can be left out if there is nothing to point to.  This is just to show where such information can go.>''
 
−
 
  
 
'''Related Profiles'''
 
'''Related Profiles'''
  
−
''<List profiles this one depends on, profiles that depend on this one, profiles that are synergistic with this one.  Start with the name of the other profile as a link and then explain the relationship.>''
+
* ''[[https://www.ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/PaLM/IHE_PaLM_Suppl_APSR.pdf| Anatomic Pathology Structured Reporting]] [APSR] APSR reports may be converted to FHIR Observations for use with MeasureReports as part of RPC.''
−
 
+
* ''[[https://www.ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/QRPH/IHE_QRPH_Suppl_SDC.pdf| Structured Data Capture]] [SDC] SDC forms may be converted to FHIR Observations for use with MeasureReports as part of RPC.''
−
* ''[[Reporting Workflow]] [RWF] may use Evidence Documents as inputs to the reporting process.''
 
−
* ''[[Simple Image & Numeric Reports]] [SINR] may include data copied from Evidence Documents.''
 
−
* ''[[Cross-enterprise Document Sharing for Imaging]] [XDS-I] can be used to share Evidence Documents between sites over a network.''
 
−
* ''[[Portable Data for Imaging]] [PDI] can store Evidence Documents on media such as CDs.''
 
−
* ''[[Import Reconciliation Workflow]] [IRWF] can fix patient ids, etc. of Evidence Documents when importing.''
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
'''Consumer Information'''
 
−
 
 
−
The [[Profile FAQ Template]] answers typical questions about what the Profile does.  ''<Replace the link with a link to the actual FAQ page for the Profile>''
 
−
 
 
−
The [[Profile Purchasing Template]] describes considerations when purchasing equipment to deploy this Profile.  ''<Replace the link with a link to the actual Purchasing page for the Profile>''
 
−
 
 
−
'''Implementer Information'''
 
−
 
 
−
The [[Profile Implementation Template]] provides additional information about implementing this Profile in software. ''<Replace the link with a link to the actual Implementation page for the Profile>''
 
−
 
 
−
'''Reference Articles'''
 
  
−
''<List References (good and bad) (with link if possible) to Journal Articles that mention IHE's work (and hopefully include some analysis).  Go ahead, Google: IHE <Profile Name> abstract  or Google: IHE <Profile Name> and under the "more" select "Scholar".  You might be surprised. >''
 
  
 
[[Category:Profiles]]
 
[[Category:Profiles]]
Line 94: Line 51:
 
[[Category:DICOM]]
 
[[Category:DICOM]]
 
[[Category:HL7v2]]
 
[[Category:HL7v2]]
 +
[[Category:FHIR]]

Latest revision as of 10:45, 2 December 2021

Radiology and Pathology Concordance (RPC) describes the creation of an integrated diagnostic report using discrete data elements, assessing concordance of data, and sharing the report to an EMR system.


Summary

The Radiology and Pathology Concordance (RPC) Profile describes how discrete data elements are collected from structured reports to create an integrated report, where concordance of results is assessed, and reports are shared to an EMR or system in use by a health facility.

The integrated report would extract data from structured radiology and pathology reports, compare the extracted results and assign a score based on the concordance of the results which will be included in a new integrated report.

Use cases include the correlation of structured reporting data for Breast, Prostate and Thyroid cancers, as well as the use of integrated diagnostic reports for radiologist training, as well as a tool in MCC’s and Tumour Board discussions to support decision making for patient care.

Benefits

  • Connecting data from disparate radiology and pathology structured reports and automatically assessing concordance
  • Integrated reports can enable improved training for radiologists and assist in the decision making around treatment and patient care*
  • The automated correlation of radiology and pathology data can save time for clinicians and reduce potential for error

Systems Affected

  • EMRs
  • Laboratory Information Systems (LIS)
  • Radiology Information Systems (RIS)


Actors & Transactions:

Specification

Profile Status: Trial Implementation

Document: RPC Supplement

Underlying Standards:

See Also

Related Profiles

This page is based on the Profile Overview Template

Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Radiology_Pathology_Concordance&oldid=126961"