Difference between revisions of "Rad Tech Minutes 2021-11-07-11"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Kevin O'Donnell | *Kevin O'Donnell | ||
*David Kwan | *David Kwan | ||
− | * | + | *Khaled Younis |
*Andrei Leontiev | *Andrei Leontiev | ||
*Wim Corbijn | *Wim Corbijn | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*Ben Larson | *Ben Larson | ||
*Cindy Wang | *Cindy Wang | ||
− | |||
*Eric Martin | *Eric Martin | ||
*Brian Bialecki | *Brian Bialecki | ||
Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
: Done. Yes. | : Done. Yes. | ||
* Do the effort points in the evaluation still seem right? | * Do the effort points in the evaluation still seem right? | ||
− | : | + | : Think so. |
* Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose? | * Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose? | ||
− | : | + | : Yes. No extra tasks |
* Describe unresolved technical issues/tasks | * Describe unresolved technical issues/tasks | ||
− | : | + | : None noted - information that doesn't fit will be future extensions |
* Describe potential practical issues | * Describe potential practical issues | ||
− | : | + | : So far so good |
* Review the open issue list. Does it feel complete | * Review the open issue list. Does it feel complete | ||
: Need to move some notes up into open issues. Otherwise OK? | : Need to move some notes up into open issues. Otherwise OK? | ||
* Which open issues feel most risky; what other risks exist? | * Which open issues feel most risky; what other risks exist? | ||
− | : | + | : Not really risky. |
* How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?) | * How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?) | ||
: Time to spare (at this stage) | : Time to spare (at this stage) | ||
Line 49: | Line 48: | ||
: Mostly. Will follow up with radiology input. | : Mostly. Will follow up with radiology input. | ||
* What tasks would benefit from additional expertise? | * What tasks would benefit from additional expertise? | ||
− | : More reporting worklist vendors | + | : More reporting worklist vendors to validate requirements. Will target during PC if we don't get them before that. |
* What vendors are engaged for each actor? Record how many. | * What vendors are engaged for each actor? Record how many. | ||
− | : | + | : Prioritizer: Canon, Siemens, Visage, GE |
+ | : Sources - haven't really dug in yet, but mostly we'll use existing functions. | ||
* Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the Kickoff meeting (See "Kickoff Meeting" above), if not what was the gap | * Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the Kickoff meeting (See "Kickoff Meeting" above), if not what was the gap | ||
: Yes | : Yes | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
* How many tcons would you like between now and the PC Prep Meeting? | * How many tcons would you like between now and the PC Prep Meeting? | ||
: Maybe 1 or 2 in January | : Maybe 1 or 2 in January | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 15:05, 10 November 2022
- Attendance List
- Kevin O'Donnell
- David Kwan
- Khaled Younis
- Andrei Leontiev
- Wim Corbijn
- Brad Genereaux
- Lynn Felhofer
- Steve Nichols
- Jonathan Whitby
- Kinson Ho
- Matt Hayes
- Ben Larson
- Cindy Wang
- Eric Martin
- Brian Bialecki
- Chris Lindop
- Chris Carr
- Jamie Dulkowski
- TeRhonda McGee
Profile Name: Reporting Worklist Prioritization
- Describe gaps in Use Case coverage
- Feels complete (currently)
- Review ALL "uncertainty points" in the evaluation. Is there a resolution plan for each?
- Done. Yes.
- Do the effort points in the evaluation still seem right?
- Think so.
- Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose?
- Yes. No extra tasks
- Describe unresolved technical issues/tasks
- None noted - information that doesn't fit will be future extensions
- Describe potential practical issues
- So far so good
- Review the open issue list. Does it feel complete
- Need to move some notes up into open issues. Otherwise OK?
- Which open issues feel most risky; what other risks exist?
- Not really risky.
- How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)
- Time to spare (at this stage)
- How does the scope feel? (Room to expand? Just right? Pretty ambitious?)
- Right
- If you had to reduce scope, what would you drop?
- Patient History, Imaging Priors, Lab/Path feeds. May still end up with those out of scope.
- Have the promised resources manifested?
- Mostly. Will follow up with radiology input.
- What tasks would benefit from additional expertise?
- More reporting worklist vendors to validate requirements. Will target during PC if we don't get them before that.
- What vendors are engaged for each actor? Record how many.
- Prioritizer: Canon, Siemens, Visage, GE
- Sources - haven't really dug in yet, but mostly we'll use existing functions.
- Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the Kickoff meeting (See "Kickoff Meeting" above), if not what was the gap
- Yes
- Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the Kickoff meeting, if not what was the gap
- Yes (being small and focused helps)
- How many tcons would you like between now and the PC Prep Meeting?
- Maybe 1 or 2 in January
Profile Name:
- Describe gaps in Use Case coverage
- Review ALL "uncertainty points" in the evaluation. Is there a resolution plan for each?
- Do the effort points in the evaluation still seem right?
- Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose?
- Describe unresolved technical issues/tasks
- Describe potential practical issues
- Review the open issue list. Does it feel complete
- Which open issues feel most risky; what other risks exist?
- How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)
- How does the scope feel? (Room to expand? Just right? Pretty ambitious?)
- If you had to reduce scope, what would you drop?
- Have the promised resources manifested?
- What tasks would benefit from additional expertise?
- What vendors are engaged for each actor? Record how many.
- Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the Kickoff meeting (See "Kickoff Meeting" above), if not what was the gap
- Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the Kickoff meeting, if not what was the gap
- How many tcons would you like between now and the PC Prep Meeting?