Rad Tech Minutes 2021-04-12-16

Monday, April 12, 2021: 8:15 - 3:45 pm Central Time (CT)

IHE Radiology Technical Committee Roster

08:15 - 08:30: Welcome, Patent Disclosure Announcement, Agenda Review

S1: 08:30 - 10:30: Contrast Administration Management (CAM) (2)

• Reviewed and completed 25 comments

S2: 10:45 - 11:30: Maintenance (.75)

• Change Proposal Ballot Results
  • Approved for Final Text
    • CP-RAD-438
    • CP-RAD 453
    • CP-RAD-456
    • CP-RAD-461

S2: 11:30 - 13:15: AI Whitepaper (1.75)

S3: 13:45 – 15:45 Maintenance (2.75)

Tuesday, April 13, 2021: 8:45 am - 1:15 pm CT

IHE Radiology Technical Committee Roster

08:45 - 09:00: Welcome, Patent Disclosure Announcement, Agenda Review

S1: 09:00 - 10:00am AI Whitepaper (2.75)

• Continued resolving comments

S1: 10:00 - 11:00am Maintenance (3.75)

• New CP: CP-RAD-463: Add RDSR Display Option REM
  • Determine how to package.
  • Explore a mid-range process. KO may start a draft table comparing the CP path on one side, profile on the other and review
  • Other notes added in the Rationale portion of the CP document
• CP-RAD-423: IOCM

S2: 11:15 - 13:15: AI Whitepaper (4.75)

• Continued resolving comments.

Wednesday, April 14, 2021: 8:15 am - 3:45 pm (CT)

IHE Radiology Technical Committee Roster

08:15 - 08:30: Welcome, Patent Disclosure Announcement, Agenda Review

S1: 08:30 - 10:30: Contrast Administration Management (CAM) (4)

• Continued resolving comments. Will finalize on Friday's session.

S2: 10:45 - 11:15: Maintenance (4.25)

• Review IHE Radiology Domain Report to determine steps needed to complete.

S2: 11:15 - 13:15: AI Whitepaper (6.75)

• Continued resolving comments. Will determine how many calls are needed to complete.

S3: 13:45 - 15:45: Maintenance (6.25)

• This 640-08version contains updates to the XCA-I CP based on today’s discussion. There are two sentences highlighted in blue that I updated after the discussion, in particular, one to clarify that the local Imaging Doc Consumer can choose to retrieve directly from a local Img Doc Source rather than going through its IIG.
  • We hope to call this ballot-ready on Friday. Pre-ballot tweaks are welcomed.
• CP-RAD-456: SOLE: update to enable ITI-20 FHIR semantics
  • This CP (also in ‘Assigned' on Google Drive) contains updates based on today’s discussion, removing the options (Syslog or FHIR) for the Event Reporter and EventConsumer, and specifying the semantic choices in the Actor Requirements instead. We retain interoperability by mandating that the Event Repository support both Syslog and FHIR semantics

Thursday, April 15, 2021: 8:45 am - 2:45 pm CT

IHE Radiology Technical Committee Roster

08:45 - 09:00: Welcome, Patent Disclosure Announcement, Agenda Review

S1: 09:00 - 10:00: Maintenance (7.25)

• CP-RAD-460 Update: Lynn will make PDF and send to Andrei

S1: 10:00 - 11:00: AI Whitepaper (8.75)

S2: 11:15 - 13:15: AI Whitepaper (10.75)

S3: 13:45 - 14:45: AI Whitepaper (11.75)

S4: 16:00 - 17:00: Not TC Time. Available for Authoring Groups if needed

TI-Prep Closing Assessments

• CAM (Contrast Administration Managmeent)
  • Did we line-by-line the entire document
  • How ready is it to go out for TI: Completely, Almost, Soonish, Hmmm
  • How did the work fit in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)
  • Review the evaluation. Which complexity/uncertainty/effort points missed the mark?
  • Or alternatively, estimate how many points you went over and assign the overage effort/complexity/uncertainty to the appropriate points.
  • Are all the open issues closed?
  • What significant debates in TI-prep were not anticipated in the Kickoff or PC-Prep
  • Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose?
  • What residual risks are worth noting
  • Does it feel we've met all the use cases
  • Did the promised resources manifest
  • What vendors are engaged (for each actor)
  • Who should specifically be targeted for TI notification (implementors & advocates)
  • When will we have sample data/objects
  • Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the TI meeting, if not what was the gap
  • Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the TI meeting, if not what was the gap
  • Do you need any tcons between now and TI Publication

• AIIiI-WP (AI Interoperability in Imaging Whitepaper)
  • Did we line-by-line the entire document
  • How ready is it to go out for TI: Completely, Almost, Soonish, Hmmm
  • How did the work fit in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)
  • Review the evaluation. Which complexity/uncertainty/effort points missed the mark?
  • Or alternatively, estimate how many points you went over and assign the overage effort/complexity/uncertainty to the appropriate points.
  • Are all the open issues closed?
  • What significant debates in TI-prep were not anticipated in the Kickoff or PC-Prep
  • Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose?
  • What residual risks are worth noting
  • Does it feel we've met all the use cases
  • Did the promised resources manifest
  • What vendors are engaged (for each actor)
  • Who should specifically be targeted for TI notification (implementors & advocates)
  • When will we have sample data/objects
  • Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the TI meeting, if not what was the gap
  • Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the TI meeting, if not what was the gap
  • Do you need any tcons between now and TI Publication