Rad Tech Minutes 2016-02-01 to 2016-02-04

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Monday, Feb. 01, 2016: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm CST Minutes

  • 08:00-08:30: Breakfast, Welcome, Agenda Reviews
    • Roster
    • Antje Schroeder
    • Yasunari Shiokawa (Salt)
    • Kevin O'Donnell
    • Nichole Drye-Mayo
    • Kinson Ho
    • Wim Corbijn
    • Cezary Klimczak
    • Chris Lindop
    • Lynn Felhofer
    • Michael Bohl
    • David Kwan
    • Elliot Silver
    • Johnny Erikkson
    • Mauro Zanardini
    • Chris Carr
  • Meeting goal: Have documents ready for Public Comment. Vote is needed on Thursday, 2/4.


  • 08:30-11:00: Technical Framework Maintenance, incl. JP-NEX (2.5)
    • Action: Committee needs to think about the possibility of 2 transactions (resembling Rad 35 and 25).


11:00-12.30: Cross-Enterprise Read of Imaging(1.5)


12:30-13:30: Lunch


  • 13:30-15.30: Technical Framework Maintenance, JP-NEX continued (4.5)
    • The RAD-28 – Structured Report Export – currently assumes that the HL7 ORU is triggered by a DICOM SR. There is value in defining the ORU for sending results w/o having a DICOM SR.
    • The following list contains updates that would be needed in the transaction. These were compiled in a RAD TC discussion (Feb 1, 2016). The list may not be exhaustive:
      • RAD TF-2:4.28.1 - update Scope description to ensure that it allows for use of the ORM in the case where we are not mapping from a DICOM SR
      • 4.28.3.1.1- add trigger event specific to the non-SR use case
      • 4.28.3.1.2 - update reference to standards to add HL7 v2.5; Consider adding a separate subsection called “Referenced Standards” that contains both 2.3.1 and 2.5
      • In message semantics, add HL7v2.5 semantics sub-sections, following the model that we have already used in HL7 transactions used in SWF.b that have 2.3.1 and 2.5 requirements
      • 4.28.3.1.2 - The current requirements in the profile do not constrain use of OBR-32 “Principal Results Interpreter”. Need to raise the bar on optionality (base standard optionality is “O”) and specify how the attribute is to be populated
      • Ensure Accession Number is included in the ORU
      • 4.28.4 - Consider moving the mapping from DICOM SR to the ORU to an appendix
      • Table 4.28-9
        • update OBX-3
        • update OBX-5
        • update the table to add ‘hand-wavy’ guidance on how to map fields from imaging studies (vs a DICOM SR)
        • Change optionality on imaging-related data from Required to Optional
        • This table contains specifications for observations with a status of F (Final). Need to profile Preliminary reports as well.
      • Fix OBX-3 for Report Text to remove SR-specific requirements
    • (for consideration by IHE-J): Is ORC-5 Order Status needed in RAD-28 to support their workflows?


15:30-17:00: Cross-Enterprise Read of Imaging (3)


Tuesday, Feb. 02, 2016: 8:00 am - 5:00 pm CST Minutes

  • 08:00-08:30: Breakfast, Welcome, Minutes & Agenda Review
    • Roster
    • Chris Lindop
    • Wim Corbijn
    • Nichole Drye-Mayo
    • Kevin O'Donnell
    • Salt
    • Michael Bohl
    • Antje Schroeder
    • Johnny
    • Rady


  • 08:30-08:50: Technical Framework Maintenance, JP-NEX continued
  • 08:50-12:30: Cross-Enterprise Read of Imaging (7)
  • 12:30-13:30: Lunch
  • 13:30-15:30: Technical Framework Maintenance - Reviewing Incoming CPs, Discuss MRRT Conditional Templates CP-307 (6.5)
  • 15:30-17:00: Cross-Enterprise Read of Imaging (8.5)