Difference between revisions of "Rad Tech Minutes 2015-09-23"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*Antje Schroeder (Siemens Healthcare) | *Antje Schroeder (Siemens Healthcare) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*Ben Macerola (Canada Health Infoway) | *Ben Macerola (Canada Health Infoway) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 10: | ||
*Cezary Klimczak (Leafsprout) | *Cezary Klimczak (Leafsprout) | ||
| − | *Charles Parisot | + | *Charles Parisot (GE Healthcare) |
*Chris Carr (RSNA) | *Chris Carr (RSNA) | ||
| Line 23: | Line 21: | ||
*Jean-Charles Dron (Interop'Sante) | *Jean-Charles Dron (Interop'Sante) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Igor Sirkovich (?) | ||
*Isabelle Gibaud (GIP-SIB) | *Isabelle Gibaud (GIP-SIB) | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
*Lynn Felhofer (Tech project manager) | *Lynn Felhofer (Tech project manager) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Mauro Zarandini (Arsenal IT) | ||
*Mike Bohl (Radiology Group) | *Mike Bohl (Radiology Group) | ||
*Susan Hollabaugh (eRAD) | *Susan Hollabaugh (eRAD) | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Teri Sippel Schmidt (Karos Health) | ||
*Walco van Loon (Forcare) | *Walco van Loon (Forcare) | ||
| Line 48: | Line 52: | ||
== Minutes == | == Minutes == | ||
| − | This is NOT a voting call. | + | This is NOT a voting call. The scope of this call is for proposal authors to briefly present their detailed proposals to the Technical Committee to complete their review and estimations of effort. |
| + | |||
| + | * '''Enterprise Scanner Protocol Management Proposal''' (presented by Dr. Krishna Juluru) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :* Q: Do we have a profile editor? | ||
| + | :* A: Chris L. has done some editing but is not the primary SME for this proposal. Propose new profile to focus on restful services to implement. | ||
| + | :* Q: Is there a growing interest to develop this profile? | ||
| + | :* A: Yes, there is a growing need to address the open issues. The legal aspect of protocol management may become an issue which could invoke legal pressure. | ||
| + | ::* ''Effort estimation:'' 35% | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''Cross-Enterprise Reporting for Imaging''' (presented by Mauro Zanardini) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :* Risks and Open Issues | ||
| + | ::* Q: Collaboration with PCC - what does this really mean? What state of the document should encompass this collaboration? What is the goal of this alignment? Does PCC have useful experts? | ||
| + | :::* The historical issue was coordinating and incorporating those experts into the development process. Would they actually attend RAD meetings or review offline? Could RADTech members attend PCC meetings? | ||
| + | :::* There are conflicting timelines with publication and F2F meetings between both RAD and PCC. | ||
| + | ::* A: PCC has most experience implementing workflow definition profiles. Would be helpful to have them review/comment on RAD profile development. PCC also works closely with ITI domain which helps with communication facilitation. | ||
| + | :::* ''Effort estimation:'' 40% | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''REM for Radiopharmaceutical Imaging Proposal''' (presented by Kevin O'Donnell) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :* ''Effort estimation:'' 20% | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''Standardized Operational Log of Events (SOLE)''' (presented by Kevin O'Donnell - filling in for Dr. Brad Erickson) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :* Attempt to meet the needs of the SWIM objectives | ||
| + | :* ''Effort estimation:'' 30% | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''Structured and Coded (Synoptic) Radiology Report Content Profile Proposal''' (presented by Teri Sippel Schmidt) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :* Q: What are we trying to achieve with this profile? | ||
| + | |||
| + | :* Teri is proposing development of a white paper that shows use cases; references Part 20 as an example (Supp 155) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :* ''Effort estimation:'' 40% | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''Scheduled Workflow (SWF.b) across-the-board CP clean up''' (presented by Teri Sippel Schmidt) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :* ''Effort estimation:'' 15% | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Action item:''' Schedule call to review maintenance of CPs | ||
Latest revision as of 16:40, 23 September 2015
Participants
- Allan Noordvyk (McKesson)
- Antje Schroeder (Siemens Healthcare)
- Ben Macerola (Canada Health Infoway)
- Cezary Klimczak (Leafsprout)
- Charles Parisot (GE Healthcare)
- Chris Carr (RSNA)
- Chris Lindop (GE Healthcare)
- David Kwan (CCO)
- Diane Larwood (Mohawk Shared Services)
- Jean-Charles Dron (Interop'Sante)
- Igor Sirkovich (?)
- Isabelle Gibaud (GIP-SIB)
- Jamie Kontos (RSNA)
- Jeff Pohlhammer (Philips)
- Jerry Wallis (Society of Nuclear Medicine)
- Kevin O'Donnell (Toshiba)
- Kinson Ho (Agfa)
- Krishna Juluru (RSNA Clinical)
- Lynn Felhofer (Tech project manager)
- Mauro Zarandini (Arsenal IT)
- Mike Bohl (Radiology Group)
- Susan Hollabaugh (eRAD)
- Teri Sippel Schmidt (Karos Health)
- Walco van Loon (Forcare)
Minutes
This is NOT a voting call. The scope of this call is for proposal authors to briefly present their detailed proposals to the Technical Committee to complete their review and estimations of effort.
- Enterprise Scanner Protocol Management Proposal (presented by Dr. Krishna Juluru)
- Q: Do we have a profile editor?
- A: Chris L. has done some editing but is not the primary SME for this proposal. Propose new profile to focus on restful services to implement.
- Q: Is there a growing interest to develop this profile?
- A: Yes, there is a growing need to address the open issues. The legal aspect of protocol management may become an issue which could invoke legal pressure.
- Effort estimation: 35%
- Cross-Enterprise Reporting for Imaging (presented by Mauro Zanardini)
- Risks and Open Issues
- Q: Collaboration with PCC - what does this really mean? What state of the document should encompass this collaboration? What is the goal of this alignment? Does PCC have useful experts?
- The historical issue was coordinating and incorporating those experts into the development process. Would they actually attend RAD meetings or review offline? Could RADTech members attend PCC meetings?
- There are conflicting timelines with publication and F2F meetings between both RAD and PCC.
- A: PCC has most experience implementing workflow definition profiles. Would be helpful to have them review/comment on RAD profile development. PCC also works closely with ITI domain which helps with communication facilitation.
- Effort estimation: 40%
- REM for Radiopharmaceutical Imaging Proposal (presented by Kevin O'Donnell)
- Effort estimation: 20%
- Standardized Operational Log of Events (SOLE) (presented by Kevin O'Donnell - filling in for Dr. Brad Erickson)
- Attempt to meet the needs of the SWIM objectives
- Effort estimation: 30%
- Structured and Coded (Synoptic) Radiology Report Content Profile Proposal (presented by Teri Sippel Schmidt)
- Q: What are we trying to achieve with this profile?
- Teri is proposing development of a white paper that shows use cases; references Part 20 as an example (Supp 155)
- Effort estimation: 40%
- Scheduled Workflow (SWF.b) across-the-board CP clean up (presented by Teri Sippel Schmidt)
- Effort estimation: 15%
Action item: Schedule call to review maintenance of CPs