Difference between revisions of "Rad Tech Minutes 2015-09-23"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
== Minutes == | == Minutes == | ||
− | This is NOT a voting call. | + | This is NOT a voting call. The scope of this call is for proposal authors to briefly present their detailed proposals to the Technical Committee to complete their review and estimations of effort. |
* '''Enterprise Scanner Protocol Management Proposal''' (presented by Dr. Krishna Juluru) | * '''Enterprise Scanner Protocol Management Proposal''' (presented by Dr. Krishna Juluru) |
Revision as of 14:59, 23 September 2015
Participants
- Allan Noordvyk (McKesson)
- Antje Schroeder (Siemens Healthcare)
- Ben Macerola (Canada Health Infoway)
- Cezary Klimczak (Leafsprout)
- Charles Parisot (GE Healthcare)
- Chris Carr (RSNA)
- Chris Lindop (GE Healthcare)
- David Kwan (CCO)
- Diane Larwood (Mohawk Shared Services)
- Jean-Charles Dron (Interop'Sante)
- Igor Sirkovich (?)
- Isabelle Gibaud (GIP-SIB)
- Jamie Kontos (RSNA)
- Jeff Pohlhammer (Philips)
- Jerry Wallis (Society of Nuclear Medicine)
- Kevin O'Donnell (Toshiba)
- Kinson Ho (Agfa)
- Krishna Juluru (RSNA Clinical)
- Lynn Felhofer (Tech project manager)
- Mauro Zarandini (Arsenal IT)
- Mike Bohl (Radiology Group)
- Susan Hollabaugh (eRAD)
- Teri Sippel Schmidt (Karos Health)
- Walco van Loon (Forcare)
Minutes
This is NOT a voting call. The scope of this call is for proposal authors to briefly present their detailed proposals to the Technical Committee to complete their review and estimations of effort.
- Enterprise Scanner Protocol Management Proposal (presented by Dr. Krishna Juluru)
- Q: Do we have a profile editor?
- A: Chris L. has done some editing but is not the primary SME for this proposal. Propose new profile to focus on restful services to implement.
- Q: Is there a growing interest to develop this profile?
- A: Yes, there is a growing need to address the open issues. The legal aspect of protocol management may become an issue which could invoke legal pressure.
- Effort estimation: 35%
- Cross-Enterprise Reporting for Imaging (presented by Mauro Zanardini)
- Risks and Open Issues
- Q: Collaboration with PCC - what does this really mean? What state of the document should encompass this collaboration? What is the goal of this alignment? Does PCC have useful experts?
- The historical issue was coordinating and incorporating those experts into the development process. Would they actually attend RAD meetings or review offline? Could RADTech members attend PCC meetings?
- There are conflicting timelines with publication and F2F meetings between both RAD and PCC.
- A: PCC has most experience implementing workflow definition profiles. Would be helpful to have them review/comment on RAD profile development. PCC also works closely with ITI domain which helps with communication facilitation.
- Isabelle (GIP-SIB) stated that France is interested in the development of this profile due to their expertise
- Effort estimation: 40%
- REM for Radiopharmaceutical Imaging Proposal (presented by Kevin O'Donnell)