Difference between revisions of "Rad Tech Minutes 2011-10-12"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
| − | + | * Chris Lindop called meeting to order at 10:05. | |
| − | + | * Roll call: Quorum attained. [https://docs.google.com/a/rsna.org/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0At_jYVJ2XnXscFRnSVFzRGZad3M4QXBlRmNQMzQ4V0E&hl=en#gid=0 See roster.] | |
| − | + | * Schedule review: Moved Radiology Planning Committee teleconference from Nov. 2 to Nov. 9. | |
| − | + | :* Moved Radiology Technical Committee meeting from Dec. 6-8 to Dec. 7-9. | |
| − | + | * Review of [http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Radiology_Proposals_2011-2012#Detailed_Proposals Detailed Profile Proposals] | |
| − | + | :* [[Unified Post-Processing Workflow with Application Hosting - Detailed Proposal]] | |
:::Kevin O'Donnell and Lawrence Tarbox presented their joint proposal. Moves post-processing work from DICOM GPS transaction to UPS. Effort rating is about 30%. Planning Committee should evaluate likelihood of adoption. | :::Kevin O'Donnell and Lawrence Tarbox presented their joint proposal. Moves post-processing work from DICOM GPS transaction to UPS. Effort rating is about 30%. Planning Committee should evaluate likelihood of adoption. | ||
| − | + | :* [[Foreign Exam Management - Detailed Proposal]] | |
| − | :::Peter Kuzmak presented joint proposal developed by him and Dave Heaney. Proposal would make it possible to incorporate outside studies into local systems to make them part of a patient's medical history. | + | :::Peter Kuzmak presented joint proposal developed by him and Dave Heaney. Proposal would make it possible to incorporate outside studies into local systems to make them part of a patient's medical history. Main use case is for handling priors, but details of use cases addressed need to be carefully flushed out and could impact scope. Effort rating is about 25%. |
| − | + | :* [[XDR-I - Detailed Proposal|Cross-enterprise Document Reliable Exchange for Imaging (XDR-I)]] | |
| + | :::Chris Lindop presented this proposal. Profile would be based on ITI XDR. Allows a point-to-point push from one send to one receiver. No registry/repository. Document set may or may not require manifest. Chris Lindop will add information to the proposal on the transactions and actors to be used and continue presentation on 10/19 teleconference. Needs to compare the approach to RAD-69 transaction used in XDS-I. | ||
| + | * Next call: 10/19, 10:00am-12:00pm CT; continue detailed proposal review | ||
[[Radiology Technical Committee]] | [[Radiology Technical Committee]] | ||
[[Category: Minutes]] | [[Category: Minutes]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:40, 12 October 2011
Attendees
- Ellie Avraham - Philips
- Anthony Brockman - Jefferson Radiology
- Chris Carr - RSNA
- Arianna Cocchiglia - Arsenal IT
- LaShawn Edwards - RSNA
- Lynn Felhofer - Tech Proj Mgr
- Kinson Ho - Agfa
- Peter Kuzmak - VHA
- Chris Lindop - GE (co-chair)
- Stephen Meyer - Canon
- Paul Morgan - Fujifilm
- Kevin O'Donnell - Toshiba
- Antje Schroeder - Siemens
- Lawrence Tarbox - Mallinckrodt Inst. Tech
- Francesca Vanzo - Arsenal
Minutes
- Chris Lindop called meeting to order at 10:05.
- Roll call: Quorum attained. See roster.
- Schedule review: Moved Radiology Planning Committee teleconference from Nov. 2 to Nov. 9.
- Moved Radiology Technical Committee meeting from Dec. 6-8 to Dec. 7-9.
- Review of Detailed Profile Proposals
-
- Kevin O'Donnell and Lawrence Tarbox presented their joint proposal. Moves post-processing work from DICOM GPS transaction to UPS. Effort rating is about 30%. Planning Committee should evaluate likelihood of adoption.
- Peter Kuzmak presented joint proposal developed by him and Dave Heaney. Proposal would make it possible to incorporate outside studies into local systems to make them part of a patient's medical history. Main use case is for handling priors, but details of use cases addressed need to be carefully flushed out and could impact scope. Effort rating is about 25%.
- Chris Lindop presented this proposal. Profile would be based on ITI XDR. Allows a point-to-point push from one send to one receiver. No registry/repository. Document set may or may not require manifest. Chris Lindop will add information to the proposal on the transactions and actors to be used and continue presentation on 10/19 teleconference. Needs to compare the approach to RAD-69 transaction used in XDS-I.
- Next call: 10/19, 10:00am-12:00pm CT; continue detailed proposal review