Difference between revisions of "Rad Tech Minutes 2009.01.27-30"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: ==Participants== ==Minutes== 1. HL7 2.5 Refactoring 2. Joint ITI/WG 26 DICOM Webservices Review and Discussion * Radiology presented an update on its current relevant activities and i...)
 
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
:* Moving Radiology to shared model of ITI XDS for Web services
 
:* Moving Radiology to shared model of ITI XDS for Web services
::* Can Radiology replace DICOM/Wado transport mechanisms with same Web Services transactions defined in ITI?
+
::* Radiology should replace DICOM/Wado transport mechanisms with Web Services image retrieve transaction as compatible as possible with document retrieve method in XDS.b
 +
:::* DICOM WG27 will help with specification of those transactions; ITI needs to coordinate with DWG27 to review divergences between the transactions defined for radiology and the general XDS retrieve model (retrieve document set)
 +
:::* Need to consider responsiveness needs of the use case (synch/asynch; pipeline/non-pipeline queries and responses)
 +
:::* DICOM WG27 need to review "Appendix V" being developed by ITI to make sure that the Web services profiled "fit" imaging model; perform "gap" analysis and provide feedback to ITI
 +
:::* Same model likely to be used for inter- and intraenterprise access
 +
::::* Intra model has higher performance requirements
 +
::::* Intra model has more precise query requirements
 +
 
 
::* Can Radiology simplify the "three-layer" model of XDS-I: registry/repository (with manifest only)/image source by enabling storage of images themselves in the repository layer
 
::* Can Radiology simplify the "three-layer" model of XDS-I: registry/repository (with manifest only)/image source by enabling storage of images themselves in the repository layer
:::* Images need to be  
+
::* Need new queries based on Web services (using their query engine) to address specific issues of discovering and retrieving imaging studies: DICOM WG 20 is working on new query standards
 +
:::* Images need to be indexed (via manifest) so that large studies don't appear as multiple query entries
 +
:::* Manifest provides useful information about
 +
:::* Currently not all general query keys are included in the radiology manifest to fit into optimized XDS.b model
 +
::* Point-to-point push of images/reports
 +
::* Notification
 +
::* Security mechanisms: role-based access control and authentication
 +
::* Updates and image management functions
 
::* Expanding beyond the Affinity Domain model
 
::* Expanding beyond the Affinity Domain model

Revision as of 12:34, 27 January 2009

Participants

Minutes

1. HL7 2.5 Refactoring

2. Joint ITI/WG 26 DICOM Webservices Review and Discussion

  • Radiology presented an update on its current relevant activities and its use cases for image sharing
  • Currently revising XDS-I profile to use XDS.b only
  • Tracking progress of supplemental profiles in ITI needed to support Web services model--such as XUA for role-based access control--but not currently confident that these solutions are ready for implementation
  • Radiology Use Cases for Image Sharing
  • Access to prior images and reports
  • Access to diagnostic images and reports for referring physicians
  • Point-to-point transfer of images and reports from site to site or from a site to an outside provider of longitudinal patient record, such as a Personal Health Record system vendor
  • Remote reading model employed frequently requires access by radiologist to multiple image sources
  • Moving Radiology to shared model of ITI XDS for Web services
  • Radiology should replace DICOM/Wado transport mechanisms with Web Services image retrieve transaction as compatible as possible with document retrieve method in XDS.b
  • DICOM WG27 will help with specification of those transactions; ITI needs to coordinate with DWG27 to review divergences between the transactions defined for radiology and the general XDS retrieve model (retrieve document set)
  • Need to consider responsiveness needs of the use case (synch/asynch; pipeline/non-pipeline queries and responses)
  • DICOM WG27 need to review "Appendix V" being developed by ITI to make sure that the Web services profiled "fit" imaging model; perform "gap" analysis and provide feedback to ITI
  • Same model likely to be used for inter- and intraenterprise access
  • Intra model has higher performance requirements
  • Intra model has more precise query requirements
  • Can Radiology simplify the "three-layer" model of XDS-I: registry/repository (with manifest only)/image source by enabling storage of images themselves in the repository layer
  • Need new queries based on Web services (using their query engine) to address specific issues of discovering and retrieving imaging studies: DICOM WG 20 is working on new query standards
  • Images need to be indexed (via manifest) so that large studies don't appear as multiple query entries
  • Manifest provides useful information about
  • Currently not all general query keys are included in the radiology manifest to fit into optimized XDS.b model
  • Point-to-point push of images/reports
  • Notification
  • Security mechanisms: role-based access control and authentication
  • Updates and image management functions
  • Expanding beyond the Affinity Domain model