Rad Plan Minutes 2010-10-27
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
Attendees
- Alex Tzannes, Aware
- David Mendelson, MD
- Charles Kahn, MD
- Curtis Langlotz, MD
- Chris Lindop
- Kinson Ho, Agfa
- James Cialdea, Aware
- Lynn Felhofer, MIR
- Niki Wirsz, Siemens
- Jonathon Dreyer, Nuance
- Chris Click, Nuance
- Kevin O'Donnell, Toshiba
- Ron Cowan, Merge
- Cor Loef, Philips
- Daniel Rubin, MD
- Chris Carr, RSNA
- Nichole Drye-Mayo
Minutes
- Reviewed profiles in preparation for selecting package of work items for development in 2011
- Allows exchange of templates in vendor-independent format, encouraging adoption of structured templates to generate higher quality, more uniform reports
- Would support RSNA Reporting Committee and RadLex work in defining templates and controlled vocabulary for radiology reporting
- Dr. Langlotz willing to lead editorial team and will bring additional resources to work
- Work is likely to be significant for all the diagnostic specialties; radiology will lead but also communicate with cardiology, eye care, lab, etc.
- Uses DICOM standards to manage image sets across sites, including synchronization and acknowledgments, delete and replace functions
- Addresses problems encountered in areas where distributed PACS has been deployed, notably in Canadian Health System
- Agfa willing to lead team; will get help from DICOM experts, including Fred Behlen
- Uses emerging DICOM UPS worklist standard to streamline reporting and potentially post-processing
- Depends on emerging DICOM standard and SIIM TRIP work outcomes
- Proposed Slates
| Proposals under Consideration | Editor | Effort | Tag |
|---|---|---|---|
| Management of Radiology Report Templates - Detailed Proposal | C. Langlotz | ||
| - - address exchange of templates only | 20% | A1 | |
| - - also address discovery/monitoring (Query, Pub/Sub, etc) | +20% | A2 | |
| Imaging Object Quality Control and Maintenance - Detailed Proposal | K. Ho | 35% | B |
| Reporting Workflow Revision - Detailed Proposal | K. O'Donnell | 40% | C |
| Cross-Community Access - Images (XCA-I) - Detailed Proposal | C. Lindop | 30% | D |
| Rad TF Maintenance 2010-11 | CoChairs | 20% | E |
The following "slates of work" were proposed, listing a group of proposals and the estimated Tech Cmte bandwith. Slates significantly over 100% must indicate a ("below the line" proposal) which is to be dropped if the Tech Cmte runs into bandwidth problems.
Slate 1 - A1 B D E = 105%
Slate 2 - A1 (A2) B D E = 125%
Slate 3 - B D E = 85%
Slate 4 - (A1) B C E = 115%
Slate 5 - A1 C (D) E = 110%
Slate 6 - A1 A2 B E = 95%
Vote Talley - Slate 1 was selected with 5 votes
- Slate 3 - 1 vote
- Slate 5 - 1 vote
- Slate 6 - 2 votes