Difference between revisions of "Rad Plan Minutes 2010-10-27"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 
* [[Rad TF Maintenance 2010-11]]
 
* [[Rad TF Maintenance 2010-11]]
 +
 +
* Proposed Slates
 +
 +
{| style="width:70%" border="1" cellpadding="4"
 +
! Proposals under Consideration                                  !! Editor      !! Effort !! Tag
 +
|-
 +
| [[Management of Radiology Report Templates - Detailed Proposal]]|| C. Langlotz  ||        ||
 +
|-
 +
| - - address exchange of templates only                          ||              || 20%    || A1
 +
|-
 +
| - - also address discovery/monitoring (Query, Pub/Sub, etc)    ||              || +20%  || A2
 +
|-
 +
| [[Basic Imaging Object Change Management - Detailed Proposal]]  || K. Ho        || 35%    || B
 +
|-
 +
| [[Reporting Workflow Revision - Detailed Proposal]]            || K. O'Donnell || 40%    || C
 +
|-
 +
| [[Cross-Community Access - Images (XCA-I) - Detailed  Proposal]]|| C. Lindop    || 30%    || D
 +
|-
 +
| [[Rad TF Maintenance 2010-11]]                                  || CoChairs    || 20%    || E
 +
|}
 +
 +
The following "slates of work" were proposed, listing a group of proposals and the estimated Tech Cmte bandwith.  Slates significantly over 100% must indicate a ("below the line" proposal) which is to be dropped if the Tech Cmte runs into bandwidth problems.
 +
 +
Slate 1 - A1 B D E = 105%
 +
 +
Slate 2 - A1 (A2) B D E  = 125%
 +
 +
Slate 3 - B D E = 85%
 +
 +
Slate 4 - (A1) B C E = 115%
 +
 +
Slate 5 - A1 C (D) E = 110%
 +
 +
Slate 6 - A1 A2 B E = 95%
 +
 +
Vote Talley - Slate 1 was selected with 5 votes
 +
Slate 3 - 1 vote
 +
Slate 5 - 1 vote
 +
Slate 6 - 2 votes
  
 
[[Radiology Planning Committee]]
 
[[Radiology Planning Committee]]
  
 
[[Category: Minutes]]
 
[[Category: Minutes]]

Revision as of 11:36, 27 October 2010

Attendees

  • Alex Tzannes, Aware
  • David Mendelson, MD
  • Charles Kahn, MD
  • Curtis Langlotz, MD
  • Chris Lindop
  • Kinson Ho, Agfa
  • James Cialdea, Aware
  • Lynn Felhofer, MIR
  • Niki Wirsz, Siemens
  • Jonathon Dreyer, Nuance
  • Chris Click, Nuance
  • Kevin O'Donnell, Toshiba
  • Ron Cowan, Merge
  • Cor Loef, Philips
  • Daniel Rubin, MD
  • Chris Carr
  • Nichole Drye-Mayo

Minutes

  • Reviewed profiles in preparation for selecting package of work items for development in 2011
  • Allows exchange of templates in vendor-independent format, encouraging adoption of structured templates to generate higher quality, more uniform reports
  • Would support RSNA Reporting Committee and RadLex work in defining templates and controlled vocabulary for radiology reporting
  • Dr. Langlotz willing to lead editorial team and will bring additional resources to work
  • Work is likely to be significant for all the diagnostic specialties; radiology will lead but also communicate with cardiology, eye care, lab, etc.
  • Uses DICOM standards to manage image sets across sites, including synchronization and acknowledgments, delete and replace functions
  • Addresses problems encountered in areas where distributed PACS has been deployed, notably in Canadian Health System
  • Agfa willing to lead team; will get help from DICOM experts, including Fred Behlen
  • Uses emerging DICOM UPS worklist standard to streamline reporting and potentially post-processing
  • Depends on emerging DICOM standard and SIIM TRIP work outcomes
  • Proposed Slates
Proposals under Consideration Editor Effort Tag
Management of Radiology Report Templates - Detailed Proposal C. Langlotz
- - address exchange of templates only 20% A1
- - also address discovery/monitoring (Query, Pub/Sub, etc) +20% A2
Basic Imaging Object Change Management - Detailed Proposal K. Ho 35% B
Reporting Workflow Revision - Detailed Proposal K. O'Donnell 40% C
Cross-Community Access - Images (XCA-I) - Detailed Proposal C. Lindop 30% D
Rad TF Maintenance 2010-11 CoChairs 20% E

The following "slates of work" were proposed, listing a group of proposals and the estimated Tech Cmte bandwith. Slates significantly over 100% must indicate a ("below the line" proposal) which is to be dropped if the Tech Cmte runs into bandwidth problems.

Slate 1 - A1 B D E = 105%

Slate 2 - A1 (A2) B D E = 125%

Slate 3 - B D E = 85%

Slate 4 - (A1) B C E = 115%

Slate 5 - A1 C (D) E = 110%

Slate 6 - A1 A2 B E = 95%

Vote Talley - Slate 1 was selected with 5 votes Slate 3 - 1 vote Slate 5 - 1 vote Slate 6 - 2 votes

Radiology Planning Committee

Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Rad_Plan_Minutes_2010-10-27&oldid=46064"