Difference between revisions of "Rad Plan Minutes 2009-09-03"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) (→Topics) |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) (→Topics) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
'''1) First Review of [[Radiology_Proposals_2009-2010#Brief_Proposals|Brief Profile Proposals]] with Authors''' | '''1) First Review of [[Radiology_Proposals_2009-2010#Brief_Proposals|Brief Profile Proposals]] with Authors''' | ||
− | * Cardiac Imaging and Multi-Stack Spine Imaging | + | '''* Cardiac Imaging and Multi-Stack Spine Imaging''' |
** Implementations of Enhanced DICOM Objects (like last year's Perfusion and Diffusion profiles) | ** Implementations of Enhanced DICOM Objects (like last year's Perfusion and Diffusion profiles) | ||
** Cardiology domain needs to be consulted on Cardiac Imaging proposal | ** Cardiology domain needs to be consulted on Cardiac Imaging proposal | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
** Need to identify | ** Need to identify | ||
− | * Imaging Object Change Management | + | '''* Imaging Object Change Management''' |
** Changes made to image studies across and within enterprises create multiple copies that may change and diverge | ** Changes made to image studies across and within enterprises create multiple copies that may change and diverge | ||
** Many additional questions are raised by cross-enterprise information exchange | ** Many additional questions are raised by cross-enterprise information exchange | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
** Kinson Ho and Genady Knizhik volunteer to be editors of white paper | ** Kinson Ho and Genady Knizhik volunteer to be editors of white paper | ||
− | * Scheduled Workflow 2.0 | + | '''* Scheduled Workflow 2.0''' |
** Proposes many updates to SWF based on changes in HL7 transactions | ** Proposes many updates to SWF based on changes in HL7 transactions | ||
** Opportunity to clarify and extend SWF transactions, including use of MPPS | ** Opportunity to clarify and extend SWF transactions, including use of MPPS | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
** Chris Lindop willing to act as profile editor | ** Chris Lindop willing to act as profile editor | ||
− | * Presentation of Processed Images | + | '''* Presentation of Processed Images''' |
** Currently there is no consistent way for modalities (that create overlays) and post-processing systems to make their compound image objects available for display and storage | ** Currently there is no consistent way for modalities (that create overlays) and post-processing systems to make their compound image objects available for display and storage | ||
** Example of Mammo CAD SR shows the downside of profiling "one true way" for post-processing of a given image type: existing solutions taking different approaches will merely ignore the profile | ** Example of Mammo CAD SR shows the downside of profiling "one true way" for post-processing of a given image type: existing solutions taking different approaches will merely ignore the profile | ||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
** Michael Planchart willing to act as proposal editor | ** Michael Planchart willing to act as proposal editor | ||
− | * DICOM Encoded Image Profile | + | '''* DICOM Encoded Image Profile''' |
** Might be subsumed into Presentation of Processed Images profile | ** Might be subsumed into Presentation of Processed Images profile | ||
** Don Mimlitch will be asked to work with Michael Planchart | ** Don Mimlitch will be asked to work with Michael Planchart | ||
− | * Diagnostic Imaging Repository Actor | + | '''* Diagnostic Imaging Repository Actor''' |
** Consensus is that some parts of this proposal could be folded into Change Management white paper | ** Consensus is that some parts of this proposal could be folded into Change Management white paper | ||
** Ask author, David Heaney to clarify proposal to indicate what parts might be distinct proposal and what parts are covered by Change Management | ** Ask author, David Heaney to clarify proposal to indicate what parts might be distinct proposal and what parts are covered by Change Management | ||
− | * Data Retention | + | '''* Data Retention''' |
** How policies about retaining and deleting images are implemented in a distributed environment | ** How policies about retaining and deleting images are implemented in a distributed environment | ||
** Might also be part of the Change Management white paper; identify deficiencies in XDS-I model | ** Might also be part of the Change Management white paper; identify deficiencies in XDS-I model |
Revision as of 13:18, 3 September 2009
Attendees
- Kinson Ho, Agfa
- Michael Planchart, Riverain Medical
- Peter Maton, Riverain Medical
- Lynn Felhofer, IHE Technical Project Manager
- Patricia Katzman, Aware
- John Paganini, Guardian Technologies
- Antje Schroder, Siemens
- David Clunie, RadPham
- Chris Lindop, GE
- Kevin O'Donnell, Toshiba
- Cor Loef, Philips
- Paul Seifert, Agfa
- David Mendelson, MD, RSNA
- Joan McMillen, RSNA
- Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA
- Chris Carr, RSNA
Topics
1) First Review of Brief Profile Proposals with Authors * Cardiac Imaging and Multi-Stack Spine Imaging
- Implementations of Enhanced DICOM Objects (like last year's Perfusion and Diffusion profiles)
- Cardiology domain needs to be consulted on Cardiac Imaging proposal
- Adoption of previous enhanced objects profiles has not been widespread so far
- Need to identify
* Imaging Object Change Management
- Changes made to image studies across and within enterprises create multiple copies that may change and diverge
- Many additional questions are raised by cross-enterprise information exchange
- In coordination with DICOM work, provide use cases for DICOM to address
- Goal is to develop white paper this year for profile development in current year,
- Kinson Ho and Genady Knizhik volunteer to be editors of white paper
* Scheduled Workflow 2.0
- Proposes many updates to SWF based on changes in HL7 transactions
- Opportunity to clarify and extend SWF transactions, including use of MPPS
- Physician Order Entry is related to SWF, but should be addressed as a separate profile in coordination with ITI (Kevin O'Donnell will post a separate proposal for this topic)
- Includes ordering codes such as RadLex Chargemaster and JJ1017
- Chris Lindop willing to act as profile editor
* Presentation of Processed Images
- Currently there is no consistent way for modalities (that create overlays) and post-processing systems to make their compound image objects available for display and storage
- Example of Mammo CAD SR shows the downside of profiling "one true way" for post-processing of a given image type: existing solutions taking different approaches will merely ignore the profile
- Burden on receiving systems (PACS, displays) to handle multiple post-processing types: one approach would be to create table of allowed approaches that receiving systems would be required to support
- Another approach might create a display profile that sets baseline for the different approaches an image display needs to support
- Proposal includes three separate approaches: 1) simple overlay images, 2) compound objects such as annotations, 3) on-demand processing of pre-processed images where post-processing does not get stored in PACS
- Michael Planchart willing to act as proposal editor
* DICOM Encoded Image Profile
- Might be subsumed into Presentation of Processed Images profile
- Don Mimlitch will be asked to work with Michael Planchart
* Diagnostic Imaging Repository Actor
- Consensus is that some parts of this proposal could be folded into Change Management white paper
- Ask author, David Heaney to clarify proposal to indicate what parts might be distinct proposal and what parts are covered by Change Management
* Data Retention
- How policies about retaining and deleting images are implemented in a distributed environment
- Might also be part of the Change Management white paper; identify deficiencies in XDS-I model
- May involve coordination with ITI to address synchronization, change management issues
- Profile authors to submit any revisions prior to 2009-09-16 teleconference to make short list of proposals to be developed into detailed proposals
2) IHE Radiology Communications Strategy 2010
- RSNA, HIMSS, SIIM, AHRA, AMA/AANS
- Participate in developing imaging scenario for HIMSS Showcase
- SIIM Call for Abstracts closes Sept. 11
- June 3-6 in Minneapolis
- General topics may be covered by Dr. Channin's SIIM U course
- Action Item: Chris Carr to contact David Channin about his presentation plans for SIIM
- Kevin O'Donnell, Chris Carr and Chris Lindop will draft abstract if it appears there is a gap in program
- NA Connectathon Trial Implementation Profile Promotion
- Action Item: David and Kevin contact AANS about BIR demonstration interest
- 2009-09-16: Teleconference to develop short list of profile proposals
- Cross-domain report, impacts to Radiology
- Board report, impacts to Radiology
- Technical Committee report, 2009 Trial Implrmentation Profile readiness for Final text: Technical Committee Minutes 2009.09.02
- www.ihe.net radiology content review
- 2010 Calendar Review: See Radiology Domain Page for timeline dates
Need to update Plan Cmte Roster to show voting privileges