Difference between revisions of "Rad Plan Minutes 2009-09-03"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 
* Presentation of Processed Images
 
* Presentation of Processed Images
**  
+
** Currently there is no consistent way for modalities (that create overlays) and post-processing systems to make their compound image objects available for display and storage
 +
** Example of Mammo CAD SR shows the downside of profiling "one true way" for post-processing of a given image type: existing solutions taking different approaches will merely ignore the profile
 +
** Burden on receiving systems (PACS, displays) to handle multiple post-processing types: one approach would be to create table of allowed approaches that receiving systems would be required to support
 +
** Another approach might create a display profile that sets baseline for the different approaches an image display needs to support
 +
** Proposal includes three separate approaches: 1) simple overlay images, 2) compound objects such as annotations, 3) on-demand processing of pre-processed images where post-processing does not get stored in PACS
 +
** Michael Planchart willing to act as proposal editor
 +
 
 +
* DICOM Encoded Image Profile
 +
** Might be subsumed into Presentation of Processed Images profile
 +
** Don Mimlitch will be asked to work with Michael Planchart
 +
 
 +
* Diagnostic Imaging Repository Actor
 +
** Consensus is that some parts of this proposal could be folded into Change Management white paper
 +
** Ask author, David Heaney to clarify proposal to indicate what parts might be distinct proposal and what parts are covered by Change Management
 +
 
 +
* Data Retention
 +
** How policies about retaining and deleting images are implemented in a distributed environment
 +
** Might also be part of the Change Management white paper; identify deficiencies in XDS-I model
 +
** May involve coordination with ITI to address synchronization, change management issues
 +
 
 +
 
 +
** Profile authors to submit any revisions prior to 2009-09-16 teleconference to make short list of proposals to be developed into detailed proposals
 +
 
  
 
** 2009-09-16: Teleconference to develop short list of profile proposals
 
** 2009-09-16: Teleconference to develop short list of profile proposals

Revision as of 11:29, 3 September 2009

Attendees

  • Kinson Ho, Agfa
  • Michael Planchart, Riverain Medical
  • Peter Maton, Riverain Medical
  • Lynn Felhofer, IHE Technical Project Manager
  • Patricia Katzman, Aware
  • John Paganini, Guardian Technologies
  • Antje Schroder, Siemens
  • David Clunie, RadPham
  • Chris Lindop, GE
  • Kevin O'Donnell, Toshiba
  • Cor Loef, Philips
  • Paul Seifert, Agfa
  • David Mendelson, MD
  • Joan McMillen, RSNA
  • Nichole Drye-Mayo, RSNA
  • Chris Carr, RSNA

Topics

1) First Review of the Profile Proposals with Authors Brief Profile Proposals

  • Cardiac Imaging and Multi-Stack Spine Imaging
    • Implementations of Enhanced DICOM Objects
    • Cardiology domain needs to be consulted
  • Imaging Object Change Management
    • Changes made to image studies across and within enterprises create multiple copies that may change and diverge
    • Many additional questions are raised by cross-enterprise information exchange
    • In coordination with DICOM work, provide use cases for DICOM to address
    • Goal is to develop white paper this year for profile development in current year,
    • Kinson Ho and Genady Knizhik volunteer to be editors of white paper
  • Scheduled Workflow 2.0
    • Proposes many updates to SWF based on changes in HL7 transactions
    • Opportunity to clarify and extend SWF transactions, including use of MPPS
    • Physician Order Entry is related to SWF, but should be addressed as a separate profile in coordination with ITI (Kevin O'Donnell will post a separate proposal for this topic)
    • Includes ordering codes such as RadLex Chargemaster and JJ1017
    • Chris Lindop willing to act as profile editor
  • Presentation of Processed Images
    • Currently there is no consistent way for modalities (that create overlays) and post-processing systems to make their compound image objects available for display and storage
    • Example of Mammo CAD SR shows the downside of profiling "one true way" for post-processing of a given image type: existing solutions taking different approaches will merely ignore the profile
    • Burden on receiving systems (PACS, displays) to handle multiple post-processing types: one approach would be to create table of allowed approaches that receiving systems would be required to support
    • Another approach might create a display profile that sets baseline for the different approaches an image display needs to support
    • Proposal includes three separate approaches: 1) simple overlay images, 2) compound objects such as annotations, 3) on-demand processing of pre-processed images where post-processing does not get stored in PACS
    • Michael Planchart willing to act as proposal editor
  • DICOM Encoded Image Profile
    • Might be subsumed into Presentation of Processed Images profile
    • Don Mimlitch will be asked to work with Michael Planchart
  • Diagnostic Imaging Repository Actor
    • Consensus is that some parts of this proposal could be folded into Change Management white paper
    • Ask author, David Heaney to clarify proposal to indicate what parts might be distinct proposal and what parts are covered by Change Management
  • Data Retention
    • How policies about retaining and deleting images are implemented in a distributed environment
    • Might also be part of the Change Management white paper; identify deficiencies in XDS-I model
    • May involve coordination with ITI to address synchronization, change management issues


    • Profile authors to submit any revisions prior to 2009-09-16 teleconference to make short list of proposals to be developed into detailed proposals


    • 2009-09-16: Teleconference to develop short list of profile proposals
  • Cross-domain report, impacts to Radiology
  • Board report, impacts to Radiology
  • Technical Committee report, 2009 Trial Implimentation Profile readiness for Final text: Technical Committee Minutes 2009.09.02
  • www.ihe.net radiology content review
  • IHE Radiology Communications Strategy 2010
    • NA Connectathon Trial Implementation Profile Promotion
    • RSNA, HIMSS, SIIM, AHRA, ...
    • SIIM Abstracts closes Sept 11
  • 2010 Calendar Review



Need to update Plan Cmte Roster to show voting privileges


Radiology Planning Committee