Difference between revisions of "Rad Plan Minutes 2008-12-02"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
McCormick Place, Chicago | McCormick Place, Chicago | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | =Attendees= | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | =Minutes= | ||
==Demonstration/Communication Feedback== | ==Demonstration/Communication Feedback== | ||
| − | + | * Exhibit floor traffic and session attendance reasonably good | |
| + | * REM profile potential candidate for 2009 demo | ||
| + | * Refocus on radiology within radiology department | ||
| + | :* Renew process of gathering Success Stories | ||
| + | :* Provide analysis of financial benefits? | ||
| + | ::* Canadian projects have done some analysis focusing on MPPS that suggested limited operational benefits | ||
| + | ::* Need specific focus on profiles/scenarios; difficult to generate broadly applicable numbers; have to include before/after analysis | ||
| + | :* Focus on operational efficiency: eg, repeat rate, turnaround time, wait list length (Canada) | ||
| + | :* Operations/management may be more interested in participating than physicians | ||
| + | :* Create rubric for gathering case study information; provide incentives, visibility | ||
| + | :* Develop online presentation/simulation of various IHE profiles/scenarios | ||
| + | ::* Acquisition workflow? | ||
| + | :::* Is it worthwhile promoting in current environment? | ||
| + | :::* Partial, incremental implementations | ||
| + | :::* 10+ year old technology | ||
| + | :::* Critical in providing good patient information at the start of the chain | ||
| + | ::* "Life of an Image" demonstration that covers whole gamut of departmental and cross-enterprise profiles, showing how IHE provides | ||
| + | :* Focus group study of radiologists, referring physicians and operational people to gather feedback on perceptions of IHE, etc. AHRA, RDBMA as source of participants? | ||
| + | ::* Face to face meeting? Survey? | ||
| + | ::* Focus on before/after, efficiencies achieved | ||
| + | :* Focus on referring physicians? | ||
| + | ::* "Revolt" around CDs | ||
| + | :::* Online validation software needs to be made more visible | ||
| + | :::* ACR refining CD validation software | ||
| + | :::* DRG, AMA and other physician organizations have endorsed PDI | ||
| + | :* Reevaluate when new national projects in US are announced: could shift focus strongly to Image Sharing | ||
==Profile Development Update== | ==Profile Development Update== | ||
Latest revision as of 11:36, 2 December 2008
Rad Plan/Tech Joint Breakfast Meeting
Dec. 2, 2008
8:30-10:00am
Rm. E270
McCormick Place, Chicago
Attendees
Minutes
Demonstration/Communication Feedback
- Exhibit floor traffic and session attendance reasonably good
- REM profile potential candidate for 2009 demo
- Refocus on radiology within radiology department
- Renew process of gathering Success Stories
- Provide analysis of financial benefits?
- Canadian projects have done some analysis focusing on MPPS that suggested limited operational benefits
- Need specific focus on profiles/scenarios; difficult to generate broadly applicable numbers; have to include before/after analysis
- Focus on operational efficiency: eg, repeat rate, turnaround time, wait list length (Canada)
- Operations/management may be more interested in participating than physicians
- Create rubric for gathering case study information; provide incentives, visibility
- Develop online presentation/simulation of various IHE profiles/scenarios
- Acquisition workflow?
- Is it worthwhile promoting in current environment?
- Partial, incremental implementations
- 10+ year old technology
- Critical in providing good patient information at the start of the chain
- "Life of an Image" demonstration that covers whole gamut of departmental and cross-enterprise profiles, showing how IHE provides
- Focus group study of radiologists, referring physicians and operational people to gather feedback on perceptions of IHE, etc. AHRA, RDBMA as source of participants?
- Face to face meeting? Survey?
- Focus on before/after, efficiencies achieved
- Focus on referring physicians?
- "Revolt" around CDs
- Online validation software needs to be made more visible
- ACR refining CD validation software
- DRG, AMA and other physician organizations have endorsed PDI
- Reevaluate when new national projects in US are announced: could shift focus strongly to Image Sharing
Profile Development Update
- Basic Image Review
- PDI Extensions - DVD, USB, Compression, Encryption, Viewer and Sending Software
- Enhanced CT/MR Supplement
- Scheduled Workflow II Use Case and Technology Development
- XDS-I.b Supplement
Radiology Image Sharing Roadmap
1) Use Case Descriptions
2) Relation to National Projects
3) General ITI Architecture
4) Web Services/SOA Alignment
Next Steps, Meetings and Teleconferences
1) Planning Committee
2) Technical Committee
- 2008.12.08 1000-1200 T-Con Enhanced CT-MR Supp
- 2008.12.18 1000-1200 T-Con Enhanced CT-MR Supp
- 2009.01.06 1000-1200 T-Con HL7 2.5 Review
- 2009.01.07 1000-1200 T-Con Basic Image Review Supp
- 2009.01.08 1000-1200 T-Con XDS-I.b Supp
- 2009.01.09 1000-1200 T-Con PDI Extensions Supp
- 2009.01.14 1000-1200 T-Con Basic Image Review Supp
- 2009.01.20 1000-1200 T-Con Enhanced MR-CT Supp
- 2009.01.27-30 All Day Chicago Prepare Supplements for Public Comment
- 2009.05.18-21 All Day Chicago Resolve Comments & Prepare Supplements for Trial Implementation