Difference between revisions of "Rad Plan Minutes 2008-10-22"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
m (Undo vandalism by Sherlock638785 (Talk)) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
===Final Selection of 2008-09 Work Items=== | ===Final Selection of 2008-09 Work Items=== | ||
====Attendance and Review of Voting Privileges==== | ====Attendance and Review of Voting Privileges==== | ||
| − | ::* Reviewed [http:// | + | ::* Reviewed [http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0ArD3xHBJFeQvdFRRS0JVajdwaDFQRDV3NHN1dzBLQmc&hl=en Radiology Planning Committee Roster]: Quorum attained; McKesson and Eastern Informatics take part in current meeting as non-voting participants |
====Discussion of Voting Procedure==== | ====Discussion of Voting Procedure==== | ||
::* Assemble slates of proposals reflecting work budget (roughly) and vote on slates | ::* Assemble slates of proposals reflecting work budget (roughly) and vote on slates | ||
| − | :* Overview of '''[ | + | :* Overview of '''[[Radiology_Proposals_2008-2009|Proposal Evaluations]]''' (See Table) |
::* General understanding of proposals within committee is good; discussion focused on advocacy, reasons for priority | ::* General understanding of proposals within committee is good; discussion focused on advocacy, reasons for priority | ||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
:::* #6: A, B, C, D2, F1, G (175%) | :::* #6: A, B, C, D2, F1, G (175%) | ||
| − | ::* After [ | + | ::* After [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Radiology/iheyr11-2009/Planning_Cmte/ihe_rad_plan_2008-2009_profile_selection_vote_2008-10-22.xls two-stage run-off process], Slate #5 was selected and the following profiles were chosen for development: |
:::* Basic Image Review | :::* Basic Image Review | ||
:::* PDI Extensions | :::* PDI Extensions | ||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
:::* Enhanced DICOM Objects - MR Diffusion, CT/MR Contrast Perfusion only | :::* Enhanced DICOM Objects - MR Diffusion, CT/MR Contrast Perfusion only | ||
| − | ===Brief Review of [ | + | ===Brief Review of [[Radiology Image Sharing Roadmap]]=== |
::* Deferred to Nov. 5 tcon | ::* Deferred to Nov. 5 tcon | ||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
| − | [ | + | [[Radiology Planning Committee]] |
| − | [ | + | [[Category: Minutes]] |
Revision as of 08:34, 21 January 2011
Attendees
- Chris Lindop (Co-chair) - GE
- Kevin O'Donnell (Co-chair) - Toshiba
- David Clunie, MD - RadPharm
- Dick Donker - Philips
- Dave Heaney - McKesson
- Mike Henderson - Eastern Informatics
- Genady Knizhnik - Agfa
- Cor Loef - Philips
- John Paganini - Guardian
- Paul Seifert - Agfa
- Niki Wirsz, PhD - Siemens
- Chris Carr - RSNA
- Nichole Drye-Mayo - RSNA
Minutes
Final Selection of 2008-09 Work Items
Attendance and Review of Voting Privileges
- Reviewed Radiology Planning Committee Roster: Quorum attained; McKesson and Eastern Informatics take part in current meeting as non-voting participants
Discussion of Voting Procedure
- Assemble slates of proposals reflecting work budget (roughly) and vote on slates
- Overview of Proposal Evaluations (See Table)
- General understanding of proposals within committee is good; discussion focused on advocacy, reasons for priority
- A. Basic Image Review
- Addresses display requirements, particularly for consumption by referring physicians
- Urgency of need has been expressed by medical societies in US
- Model for setting display requirements is established in Nuc Med and Mammo display profiles
- B. PDI Extensions
- Addresses pressing, current need in radiology
- Activity by DRG and others in compression raises political stakes of addressing the issue now
- C. XDS-I Using XDS.b technology
- Aligns radiology with direction of ITI committees and implementation projects
- Strong desire in Radiology Informatics Committee to promote this as future direction of Image Sharing
- D. Image Management Enhancements
- Provides workflow functions (delete, replace, etc.) in distributed environments
- Addresses critical needs of current installations in Multi-PACS environments
- Question about whether underlying standards are in place to efficiently address the issue; concern about misusing standards
- Possible to address current implementation requirements through other authorities (eg, Canada Health Infoway)
- Raises additional use cases for working in a hybrid SWF/XDS environment
- E. Enhanced DICOM Objects
- Underlying standards are important and well established (including prior demonstrations); proposal for profile has been under consideration for 3 years
- Profile would be basis for series of clinically specific subprofiles
- Issues of working in a mixed environment would remain out of scope
- Speed of transfers in working with large data sets is one of the key clinical benefits
- Enables higher-level interoperability among specialty applications (eg, cardiac systems)
- F. Scheduled Workflow II
- Aligns SWF with PAM profile and development path of HL7 messaging
- Optional part of proposal to add Study Ready message
- Question about whether this item is feasible; suggest as DICOM work item and address when standards available
- G. Required Profile Maintenance
Voting
- Assembled voting slates for consideration:
- #1: A, B, C, E2, F1, G (145%)
- #2: A, C, E2, G (100%)
- #3: A, B, C, G (85%)
- #4: A, B, C, F1, G (120%)
- #5: A, B, C, E2, G (110%)
- #6: A, B, C, D2, F1, G (175%)
- After two-stage run-off process, Slate #5 was selected and the following profiles were chosen for development:
- Basic Image Review
- PDI Extensions
- XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology
- Enhanced DICOM Objects - MR Diffusion, CT/MR Contrast Perfusion only
Brief Review of Radiology Image Sharing Roadmap
- Deferred to Nov. 5 tcon
Next Planning Committee Tcons/Meetings:
- Nov. 5, 10-11am Regular Committee Business; 11am-12pm Review IHE Presentations for RSNA Annual Meeting
- Dec. 2, 8:30-10:30am, Radiology Planning/Technical Committee Breakfast at RSNA 2008