Difference between revisions of "Rad Plan Minutes 2008-09-17"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
 
* Estimate effort level required with each proposal
 
* Estimate effort level required with each proposal
 
** Identify champions and work groups for profiles where possible
 
** Identify champions and work groups for profiles where possible
 +
* Establish strategic priorities within domain
 +
 
* Select "short list" to provide to Technical Committee
 
* Select "short list" to provide to Technical Committee
 
* Discussion of each proposal will be limited to 5-10 minutes
 
* Discussion of each proposal will be limited to 5-10 minutes
  
  
# Enhanced DICOM Objects - Brief Proposal
+
====Enhanced DICOM Objects - Brief Proposal====
# XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology - Brief Proposal
+
====XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology - Brief Proposal====
 +
* Need to decide upon the scope of development for this cycle and priority
 +
** XDS-I and image sharing across care sites is a politically hot topic
 +
** Is it a problem IHE can advance a useful solution for and achieve adoption?
 +
** Will updating XDS-I to XDS.b lead to dramatic improvement in adoption?
 +
** Within a given PACS environment, Web access is a feature already typically available
 +
** Add PHR use case to XDS-I?
 +
** Address Web services-based transfer protocol for images in coordination with DICOM WG10 and ITI?
 +
** Canadian model is to establish centralized architecture for DI: regional PACS
 
# PDI Extensions - Brief Proposal
 
# PDI Extensions - Brief Proposal
 
# Basic Image Review - Brief Proposal
 
# Basic Image Review - Brief Proposal

Revision as of 09:11, 17 September 2008

Attendees

  • David Clunie, MD - RadPharm
  • Chris Lindop - GE (Co-chair)
  • Kevin O'Donnell - Toshiba (Co-chair)
  • Paul Seifert - Agfa
  • Peter Mildenberger, MD - DRG
  • David Mendelson, MD - RSNA
  • Jerold Wallis, MD - SNM

Minutes

Review of Brief Profile Proposals

  • Estimate bandwidth of Technical Committee to review proposals
  • Establish general strategy for development cycle: aggressive development or consolidation?
  • Estimate effort level required with each proposal
    • Identify champions and work groups for profiles where possible
  • Establish strategic priorities within domain
  • Select "short list" to provide to Technical Committee
  • Discussion of each proposal will be limited to 5-10 minutes


Enhanced DICOM Objects - Brief Proposal

XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology - Brief Proposal

  • Need to decide upon the scope of development for this cycle and priority
    • XDS-I and image sharing across care sites is a politically hot topic
    • Is it a problem IHE can advance a useful solution for and achieve adoption?
    • Will updating XDS-I to XDS.b lead to dramatic improvement in adoption?
    • Within a given PACS environment, Web access is a feature already typically available
    • Add PHR use case to XDS-I?
    • Address Web services-based transfer protocol for images in coordination with DICOM WG10 and ITI?
    • Canadian model is to establish centralized architecture for DI: regional PACS
  1. PDI Extensions - Brief Proposal
  2. Basic Image Review - Brief Proposal
  3. Mammography Workstation Bidirectional Interface
  4. Scheduled Workflow II Phase 2 - Brief Proposal
  5. Cross Community Access for Imaging (XCA-I) - Brief Proposal
  6. Image Management Enhancements - Brief Proposal

Vote on Proposals to go on Short List

  • Action: Rad Plan Cochairs will send the Short List to Tech Cmte for feasibility and effort evaluation

Approach to Making XDS-I compatible with XDS.b