Difference between revisions of "Rad Plan Minutes 2008-09-03"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
* Add detailed dates to 2008-2009 development timeline | * Add detailed dates to 2008-2009 development timeline | ||
− | :* Reissue call for Brief Profile Proposals with due date of Sept. 15 | + | :* '''Action Item:''' Reissue call for Brief Profile Proposals with due date of Sept. 15 |
* Reviewed Brief Profile Proposals submitted this far | * Reviewed Brief Profile Proposals submitted this far | ||
:* Basic Image Review | :* Basic Image Review | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
::* Profile development challenge will be organizing participants and gaining satisfactory consensus (while avoiding "buttonology") | ::* Profile development challenge will be organizing participants and gaining satisfactory consensus (while avoiding "buttonology") | ||
::* Goal is to have event to evaluate viewers at AANS meeting in April | ::* Goal is to have event to evaluate viewers at AANS meeting in April | ||
− | ::* Small to medium proposal | + | ::* Initial Small to medium proposal |
::* David Clunie volunteers to help draft supplement | ::* David Clunie volunteers to help draft supplement | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* PDI Extensions | ||
+ | ::* Expands PDI to address other kinds of media--removable USB media and DVD | ||
+ | ::* Low to medium effort: may be set of CPs to PDI or new version of profile | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology | ||
+ | ::* Upgrading the technology for publishing and retrieving manifest to XDS.b | ||
+ | ::* DICOM WG10 is now working on Web services-based transfer protocols to be published in 2009 | ||
+ | ::* Intent would be to replace the transfer protocol sections of profile when the new DICOM Web services become available | ||
+ | ::* Question is whether security details ought to be included/referenced; eg, is XUA available for prime time | ||
+ | ::* Medium to large piece of work; definitely a major profile | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* Enhanced DICOM Image | ||
+ | ::* Enables interoperability of applications at a higher level; see 5 use cases defined | ||
+ | ::* IHE might specify display behavior that makes use of the new objects | ||
+ | ::* Important to get domain experts, including workstation vendors | ||
+ | ::* Medium-sized piece of work |
Revision as of 10:56, 3 September 2008
Attendees
- David Clunie
- Kevin O'Donnell
- John Paganini
- Paul Seifert
- Niki Wirsz
- Joan
- Nichole
- Chris
Minutes
- Add detailed dates to 2008-2009 development timeline
- Action Item: Reissue call for Brief Profile Proposals with due date of Sept. 15
- Reviewed Brief Profile Proposals submitted this far
- Basic Image Review
- Addresses demands for standardized baseline viewer by AMA, AANS, ACR, etc.
- Dovetails with PDI to allow access to images for referring physicians
- Profile would set baseline functional criteria and set some broad parameters for user interface
- Physician groups may still persist in seeking development of a mandatory baseline viewer
- Profile development challenge will be organizing participants and gaining satisfactory consensus (while avoiding "buttonology")
- Goal is to have event to evaluate viewers at AANS meeting in April
- Initial Small to medium proposal
- David Clunie volunteers to help draft supplement
- PDI Extensions
- Expands PDI to address other kinds of media--removable USB media and DVD
- Low to medium effort: may be set of CPs to PDI or new version of profile
- XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology
- Upgrading the technology for publishing and retrieving manifest to XDS.b
- DICOM WG10 is now working on Web services-based transfer protocols to be published in 2009
- Intent would be to replace the transfer protocol sections of profile when the new DICOM Web services become available
- Question is whether security details ought to be included/referenced; eg, is XUA available for prime time
- Medium to large piece of work; definitely a major profile
- Enhanced DICOM Image
- Enables interoperability of applications at a higher level; see 5 use cases defined
- IHE might specify display behavior that makes use of the new objects
- Important to get domain experts, including workstation vendors
- Medium-sized piece of work