Difference between revisions of "Rad Plan Minutes 2008-09-03"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
==Minutes==
 
==Minutes==
 
* Add detailed dates to 2008-2009 development timeline
 
* Add detailed dates to 2008-2009 development timeline
:* Reissue call for Brief Profile Proposals with due date of Sept. 15
+
:* '''Action Item:''' Reissue call for Brief Profile Proposals with due date of Sept. 15
 
* Reviewed Brief Profile Proposals submitted this far
 
* Reviewed Brief Profile Proposals submitted this far
 
:* Basic Image Review
 
:* Basic Image Review
Line 22: Line 22:
 
::* Profile development challenge will be organizing participants and gaining satisfactory consensus (while avoiding "buttonology")  
 
::* Profile development challenge will be organizing participants and gaining satisfactory consensus (while avoiding "buttonology")  
 
::* Goal is to have event to evaluate viewers at AANS meeting in April
 
::* Goal is to have event to evaluate viewers at AANS meeting in April
::* Small to medium proposal
+
::* Initial Small to medium proposal
 
::* David Clunie volunteers to help draft supplement
 
::* David Clunie volunteers to help draft supplement
 +
 +
:* PDI Extensions
 +
::* Expands PDI to address other kinds of media--removable USB media and DVD
 +
::* Low to medium effort: may be set of CPs to PDI or new version of profile
 +
 +
:* XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology
 +
::* Upgrading the technology for publishing and retrieving manifest to XDS.b
 +
::* DICOM WG10 is now working on Web services-based transfer protocols to be published in 2009
 +
::* Intent would be to replace the transfer protocol sections of profile when the new DICOM Web services become available
 +
::* Question is whether security details ought to be included/referenced; eg, is XUA available for prime time
 +
::* Medium to large piece of work; definitely a major profile
 +
 +
:* Enhanced DICOM Image
 +
::* Enables interoperability of applications at a higher level; see 5 use cases defined
 +
::* IHE might specify display behavior that makes use of the new objects
 +
::* Important to get domain experts, including workstation vendors
 +
::* Medium-sized piece of work

Revision as of 10:56, 3 September 2008

Attendees

  • David Clunie
  • Kevin O'Donnell
  • John Paganini
  • Paul Seifert
  • Niki Wirsz
  • Joan
  • Nichole
  • Chris

Minutes

  • Add detailed dates to 2008-2009 development timeline
  • Action Item: Reissue call for Brief Profile Proposals with due date of Sept. 15
  • Reviewed Brief Profile Proposals submitted this far
  • Basic Image Review
  • Addresses demands for standardized baseline viewer by AMA, AANS, ACR, etc.
  • Dovetails with PDI to allow access to images for referring physicians
  • Profile would set baseline functional criteria and set some broad parameters for user interface
  • Physician groups may still persist in seeking development of a mandatory baseline viewer
  • Profile development challenge will be organizing participants and gaining satisfactory consensus (while avoiding "buttonology")
  • Goal is to have event to evaluate viewers at AANS meeting in April
  • Initial Small to medium proposal
  • David Clunie volunteers to help draft supplement
  • PDI Extensions
  • Expands PDI to address other kinds of media--removable USB media and DVD
  • Low to medium effort: may be set of CPs to PDI or new version of profile
  • XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology
  • Upgrading the technology for publishing and retrieving manifest to XDS.b
  • DICOM WG10 is now working on Web services-based transfer protocols to be published in 2009
  • Intent would be to replace the transfer protocol sections of profile when the new DICOM Web services become available
  • Question is whether security details ought to be included/referenced; eg, is XUA available for prime time
  • Medium to large piece of work; definitely a major profile
  • Enhanced DICOM Image
  • Enables interoperability of applications at a higher level; see 5 use cases defined
  • IHE might specify display behavior that makes use of the new objects
  • Important to get domain experts, including workstation vendors
  • Medium-sized piece of work