Difference between revisions of "Rad Plan Future Agenda Topics"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
* XDS.b Document Management and Privacy
 
* XDS.b Document Management and Privacy
** Review the XDS.b options on the Document Consumer
+
** Review the XDS.b options on the Document Consumer and Document Source
 
** They address use cases that are analagous for Imaging Reports and Images
 
** They address use cases that are analagous for Imaging Reports and Images
 
** Need to analyze RAD use cases and consider a work item to address them
 
** Need to analyze RAD use cases and consider a work item to address them
*** e.g. by adopting/tweaking the XDS.b options
+
*** Possibly by adopting/tweaking the XDS.b options (e.g., XDS.b named options for the Document Source)
 
** This overlaps heavily with the issues being considered by IHE Canada/Infoway
 
** This overlaps heavily with the issues being considered by IHE Canada/Infoway
 
*** Try to involve David Heaney, Peter Bak, etc.
 
*** Try to involve David Heaney, Peter Bak, etc.

Revision as of 09:57, 18 May 2009

Feel free to add proposed agenda items here.


Urgent: For Next Meeting

Try to indicate why it's urgent

Near Term: For Upcoming Meeting

Describe near term topic

  • XDS.b Document Management and Privacy
    • Review the XDS.b options on the Document Consumer and Document Source
    • They address use cases that are analagous for Imaging Reports and Images
    • Need to analyze RAD use cases and consider a work item to address them
      • Possibly by adopting/tweaking the XDS.b options (e.g., XDS.b named options for the Document Source)
    • This overlaps heavily with the issues being considered by IHE Canada/Infoway
      • Try to involve David Heaney, Peter Bak, etc.

"Parking Lot": For Someday

Review these from time to time for activation

  • NEMA DICOM Library
    • Vendors who create objects have not been populating the library
    • One reason may be lack of a carrot
    • IHE has played with the idea of making Products (vs Prototypes) a more prominant part of Connectathon
    • Combining these, perhaps vendors could sign up to do Product Testing vs Prototype Testing (similar to the current supportive vs comprehensive)
    • One requirement for passing the Product level could be to post objects to the NEMA Library
  • Marketing Review
    • Review coverage at relevant conferences and supplement as necessary
      • RSNA
      • SIIM
      • AHRA
      • Europe?
      • Asia?
      • More?