Difference between revisions of "Quality Roadmap"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 34: Line 34:
  
 
Generate justification data when needed (through use of QED?)
 
Generate justification data when needed (through use of QED?)
 
AQA development of appropriateness metrics for imaging efficiency and cost effectiveness
 
  
 
AQA principles for developing measures of appropriateness
 
AQA principles for developing measures of appropriateness

Revision as of 15:07, 22 May 2007

Legend

Priority:
H
Essential Now
M
Essential Future
L
Nice to Have

Prerequisites: List of applicable standards

Coordination: Other domains to coordinate efforts with.

Strategy:
CP
Develop Content Profile
IP
Develop Integration Profile
Res
Research Applicable Standards
Promote
Promote Applicable Standards Development Efforts

Year: Earliest Opportunity given prerequisites, priority and skills.

Roadmap

Topic Pri Standards/Prerequesites Coord Strategy Year
Peer Review ACR RadPeer program

Peer review and feedback

Decision support for ordering and procedure approvals Massachusetts program based on ACR appropriateness criteria (consult with Dr. Keith Dreyer/MGH)

Generate justification data when needed (through use of QED?)

AQA principles for developing measures of appropriateness

ACC/AHA Appropriateness Criteria, decision support tools

Retrospective review of outcomes based on utilization of evolving technologies
Radiation dose

Appropriate aggregation of dose information

Minimization of dose to patient population

Real-time documentation of continuing education and accreditation (point-of-care CME)
Patient assessment to prevent adverse events
Adverse event reporting


Joint commission requirements (per state)

CDC has voluntary and mandatory reporting for some diseases

Measure Reporting

Core Measure Reporting

Measures developers, endorsers, testers, implementers
Data registries Procedure-specific datasets

Gathering quality data (peer review, patient safety, etc.) from various care settings

Intermediary point to aggregate date to share with CMS, other destination agencies

Protocols in place and physician use of protocols

Standardized reporting: develop standard formats for reports (eg, Echo, Cath Lab, Nuc Med) to ensure report has elements needed to collect quality data
Consumer aspects of quality reporting PHR as record of repeat procedures

Consumer view of provider quality information

Patient self management

Home health monitoring

Informed patient consent

Harmonization with other initiatives

a. Uniformity of measure import and export formats

b. Measuring health delivery disparities across demographic segments (eg, race, gender, socioeconomic status) - AHA Health Research and Educational Trust, HRSA

c. Care coordination efforts across disciplines - NQF, CMS

d. Structural measures - different groups, data measures (eg, infection control)

e. NCVHS hearings in July

f. State/provincial/regional quality measures

g. AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Quality

i. Patient identity management/tracking of patients across settings

h. Expected AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Adverse Events

3. Consumer aspects of quality reporting

a. PHR as record of repeat procedures

b. Consumer view of provider quality information

c. Patient self management

d. Home health monitoring

e. Informed patient consent