Quality, Research and Public Health Technical Committee/Review Guidance

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

In QRPH, reviewers can use the following helpful guidelines to help them start the review process.

Please work with the Technical Co-chairs to add to this list. We always welcome your input to improve this process.

  • Did the authors speak with stakeholders? Were the stakeholders involved in the process?
  • Is the non technical introduction easy to understand (by non-developers)? Does it clearly describe the problem the profile is trying to solve?
  • Does the profile supplement conform to current IHE template used by QRPH? Are all the sections and tables / figures numbered correctly?
  • Does the document make sense? Can a new implementer understand the flow?
  • Do the Process flow diagrams and the Actor-transaction diagrams make sense? Are they technically correct?
  • Are use cases and actors/transactions/content correctly defined?