Difference between revisions of "Pharm Tech Minutes 2011.10.31"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Introduction) |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
=== Shall there be one workflow document per prescription or one per prescription item?=== | === Shall there be one workflow document per prescription or one per prescription item?=== | ||
| − | === Shall we use “In progress” states or leave all tasks as “born completed”=== | + | === Shall we use “In progress” states or leave all tasks as “born completed” ? === |
| + | |||
| + | A question easier to solve after previous discussions. | ||
Revision as of 05:25, 2 November 2011
CPMD / XDW dedicated TCon
Attendees
- Brandstätter, Jürgen (CodeWerk Software Services and Development GmbH, Vendor co-chair)
- Cocchiglia, Arianna (Arsenal.IT)
- Demarmels, Marco (Lake Griffin, LLC)
- Jansek, Stefan (Wien Medical informatics University, Austria)
- Lagouarde, Philippe (Cegedim, IHE France)
- Letellier, Simon (EAHP, secretary)
- Parisot, Charles (GE)
- Peytchev, Vassil (Epic)
- Surugue, Jacqueline (EAHP, User co-chair)
- Zalunardo, Luca (Arsenal.IT)
Introduction
Presentation of Philippe Lagouarde, IHE France co-chair to the group.
Interested to learn more about CMPD/XDW after Charles Parisot's presentation at the IHE France F2F meeting.
Shall it be required mandatory as the “minimum workflow” in the profile?
Shall there be one workflow document per prescription or one per prescription item?
Shall we use “In progress” states or leave all tasks as “born completed” ?
A question easier to solve after previous discussions.