Difference between revisions of "Pharm Tech Minutes 2011.10.27"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
===Summary on major decisions=== | ===Summary on major decisions=== | ||
| − | + | * 3 Whites Papers: | |
| + | 1) exceptional uses cases, | ||
| + | 2) medication - documentation profile and | ||
| + | 3) hospital medication supply chain | ||
| + | |||
| + | * CP ballot for TF maintenance | ||
== Schedule for season 2011/2012 (Jürgen) == | == Schedule for season 2011/2012 (Jürgen) == | ||
Revision as of 05:17, 31 October 2011
Attendees
- Brandstätter, Jürgen (CodeWerk Software Services and Development GmbH, co-chair IHE)
- De Jong, Tom (Nova Pro)
- Demarmels, Marco (Lake Griffin, LLC)
- Géraud, Thierry (CareFusion)
- Hafner, Viktor (Linden Apotheke)
- Letellier, Simon (EAHP, secretary)
- Parisot, Charles (GE)
- Peytchev, Vassil (Epic)
- Rica, Charles (ASIP Santé)
- Robberecht, Marc (Agfa Healthcare)
- Rodrigues, Orlando (Glintt - Heatlhcare Solutions, S.A)
- Tzimis, Leonidas (EAHP)
- Zalunardo, Luca (Arsenal.IT)
F2F meeting Paris, Oct 4./5., 2011
Approval of minutes
Day 1 : IHE Pharmacy F2F Meeting
Day 2 : IHE Pharmacy & HL7 Pharmacy Joint Meeting
Workitems will be restarted based on the use cases (particular supplies for patients). Prepare workitems for the next cycle.
are added to the minutes on Vassil's proposal, to explain the agreement approved, following the presentation of the white paper for the realization, based on this, of work items for the next cycle.
With this addition, minutes are approved unanimously.
Summary on major decisions
- 3 Whites Papers:
1) exceptional uses cases, 2) medication - documentation profile and 3) hospital medication supply chain
- CP ballot for TF maintenance
Schedule for season 2011/2012 (Jürgen)
See draft schedule attached (Schedule_2011-2012_v2)
·
Status overview
Change proposals
CP ballot #1 – Status (Jürgen)
CP for CMPD to incorporate XDW (Luca, Arianna, Jürgen)
Workflow-in-CMPD (See slides attached)
Questions to be discussed:
Basic workflow (see slides attached)
- Is it ok?
- Shall it be required mandatory as the “minimum workflow” in the profile?
Shall there be one workflow document per prescription or one per prescription item?
Shall we use “in progress” states or leave all tasks as “born completed”?
ATTENTION
- There will be a subsequent TCon just on this topic at Monday, Oct 31., 2011, 16:00 – 17:30 (Paris time)