PaLM Conf Minutes 2021-September-08

From IHE Wiki
Revision as of 14:13, 7 October 2021 by Salaver (talk | contribs) (→‎Attendees)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Attendees

Name Email
Francois Macary Francois.macary@phast.fr
David Clunie dclunie@dclunie.com
James McNulty jmcnult@cap.org
Alessandro Sulis Allesandro.sulis@crs4.it
Dan Rutz drutz@epic.com
Filip Migom Filip.migom@mips.be
Raj Dash r.dash@duke.edu
Megumi Kondo megumi.kondo.sakura.japan@gmail.com
Jim Harrison james.harrison@virginia.edu
Ralf Herzog ralf.herzog@roche.com
JD Nolen jdlnolen@gmail.com
Francesca Frexia Francesca.frexia@crs4.it
Nick Haarselhorst nick.haarselhorst@philips.com
Mary Kennedy mkenned@cap.org
Gunter Haroske haroske@icloud.com
Riki Merrick rikimerrick@gmail.com
Brian Bialecki bbialecki@acr.org
Gianluca Pavan Arsenal.IT
Alex Goel agoel@cap.org
David Beckman dBeckman@epic.com
Gregorio Canal Arsenal.IT
John Spinosa johnchrisspinosa@gmail.com
Mandel Mickley
Norman Zerbe norman.zerbe@charite.de
Victor Brodsky
Liora Alschuler

Next meeting: October 13, 2021

Discussion

  • F2F Updates -> Ghent 2022?
    • Digital Path conference in spring in Europe
    • HL7 is in the US – May 8-13
    • Ghent flowers – April 29 – May 8
    • Possibly May 2 – 4 (2.5) – Save the date for Ghent
  • SET updates (Public comment period opened, Alessandro, Francesca)
  • New Project updates
    • RadPath Correlation profile
      • Sent in August; feedback and comments resolved
      • current draft is here: https://groups.google.com/a/ihe.net/g/palm/c/jcx_epvWHS0
      • Fairly new method for achieving correlated results, but it is still based on US quality measures and also based on 2 IHE profiles in QRPH WG
      • Proposed vendors
        • Epic has
        • Intuitive (pathology)
        • Missed one (pathology)
        • Nuance (radiology)
        • CAP had meetings with several vendors as well
      • John Moehrke suggested to create a FHIR IG on the IHE Template
        • Will do after the comment period closes and comments applied
      • Cross profile considerations are named for both SDC and APSR
      • Timing would be for demo project to the connectathon
      • Reviewing example:
        • FHIR Measure = definitional resource defines the correlation
        • FHIR observation – one for Pathology result and the radiology result – these would come out of the DiagnosticReport resources
        • MeasureReport – compiles the results of the 2 observations based on the definitions in the Measure resource
        • Expected coding is SNOMED CT which should work with any terminology serviceable in FHIR – ICD, LOINC, SNOMED CT etc
        • The definitional resource of MEASURE defines the terminology being used
  • DPIA Update
    • We were not describing the glass slide separately from the tissue
      • Created a CP for the DPIA profile to add in SAC to describe the container

Image1 09082021.png