PaLM Conf Minutes 2019-July-10
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Attendees
| Name | Name |
|---|---|
| Megumi Kondo | Alessandro Sulis |
| Raj Dash | Francois Macary |
| Dan Rutz | Kevin Schap |
| Filip Migom | Gunter Haroske |
| Ralf Herzog | Nick Hasselhorst |
| Riki Merrick | Ian Gabriel |
| Ed Heierman |
SET
- Trying to reduce the number of message structures; There are many similarities between the different events that can utilize the same structure
- Still addressing comments from OO – added a new structure for unsuccessful specimen collection, but merged 47 and the old S50
- New S50 for derived specimen – for tracking numerous processing step
- Processing without derived specimen – just adding additive to the same container; staining the slide; identifiers don’t change, but the attribute of stain MUST still be changed, not sure that makes it a new specimen – for more discussion
- If the container changes that is a derived specimen
- Plan to vote on some of the points or all of the points on the next ballot call on 7/11; Close to a final change proposal
TMA
- Filip sent it out for review
- Added use cases to the document and explained the static message definition
- Need to still define BPO table
- Took the BTX table from v2.7 – for fields where we had discussion added PaLM definitions and interpretations
- Have not yet built sample messages
- What version of HL7 to use for TMA? V2.5.1 or V2.8.2 (requires use of PRT) – better stick to V2.5.1
- Dan, Francois and Riki to review – naming of BTX-11 codes; barcode on its own including the flag (BTX-2)
- Raj and Riki need to get together to make slides for Aug 22 – review on 8/14 call
DICOM IHE Image Acquisition Profile
- Google drive link to profile diagram: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1WT4fvaK3zSLsxQL3nXmr4jsvms6XUAXBwin89z6JHns/edit?usp=sharing
- Google drive link to profile metadata spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12i6hoEjX-h0k11vbg2VE0-jTSI_m42NcfFTlTQMhSH8/edit?usp=sharing
- For new folks – review the open and closed issues
- Have added the inbound message structure – from Acquisition manager to the Acquisition modality
- In the spreadsheet we have only OBR, SPM
- If the common definition as they are used in PaLM TF Vol 2.x, then it is ok to just refer to them there – only need table and field descriptions, when not the same (but then include all that are R in base TF)
Raj plans to have inbound message ready for review soon LCC
- Has been published: https://www.ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/PaLM/IHE_PaLM_Suppl_LCC.pdf
Next Face to Face Meeting
- CAP headquarters: Nov 13 - 15