Difference between revisions of "PCD Virtual Connectathon Testing 2009"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Tests Required of Each Profile and Actor: Establish the section) |
m (→Partners and Schedules: Establish section) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
− | == | + | == Test Results == |
− | + | :{|border="2" | |
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! width="20%" align="center" |Sending System | ||
+ | ! width="20%" align="left" |Developer Name | ||
+ | ! width="20%" align="left" |Receiving System | ||
+ | ! width="20%" align="left" |Developer Name | ||
+ | ! width="5%" align="left" |Pre-Conn Test No. | ||
+ | ! width="5%" align="left" |Date Successful | ||
+ | ! width="5%" align="left" |Simulated or Internet | ||
+ | ! align="left" |Comments | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | align="center" | | ||
+ | | '''<Sending System>''' | | ||
+ | | '''<Developer Name>:''' | | ||
+ | | '''<Receiving System>''' | | ||
+ | | '''<Developer Name>''' | | ||
+ | | '''<Pre-Conn Test No.>''' | | ||
+ | | '''<Date Successful>:''' | | ||
+ | | '''<Simulated or Internet>:''' | | ||
+ | | '''<Comments>:''' | | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | align="center" | 62 | ||
+ | | '''<Action Item>''' |Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations; which domain is responsible? | ||
+ | | '''<Owner>:''' |Todd | ||
+ | | '''<Participants>''' | Co-chairs | ||
+ | | '''<Due Date>''' | 2009.01.21 | ||
+ | | '''<Status>''' |OPEN | ||
+ | | '''<Comments>:''' | Can consistency be achieved for bar coding across vendors, domains? Todd has been in contact with HIBCC. Todd will add to Future Topics Agenda of Domain Cochairs. | ||
== Links == | == Links == |
Revision as of 19:51, 25 January 2009
This page provides the Patient Care Device domain a place to
- list and describe the tests that are required for each actor and participant
- an ability to find and document partners and test schedule
Tests Required of Each Profile and Actor
Please refer to the table in each Pre-Connectathon test document for identification of the tests.
Scheduling and arrangements for testing are made by the developers.
Systems that cannot conduct tests over the Internet should test with emailed messages and the MWB or other tool and record results as if the test was conducted over the Internet, noting that this was a simulation in the last column of the Results Table.
Companies and Systems Supporting the Actors
Test Results
Sending System Developer Name Receiving System Developer Name Pre-Conn Test No. Date Successful Simulated or Internet Comments 62 Incorporate Bar Coding into ADT implementations; which domain is responsible? Todd Co-chairs 2009.01.21 OPEN Can consistency be achieved for bar coding across vendors, domains? Todd has been in contact with HIBCC. Todd will add to Future Topics Agenda of Domain Cochairs. Links