PCD Technical Committee Action Items

From IHE Wiki
Revision as of 18:33, 6 April 2011 by Efurst (talk | contribs) (→‎Items 60 - 69: complete updates; move closed item 67)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

See also PCD Technical Committee Closed Action Items page.

To see changes between current and last(or any earlier) versions of the action item list, click the history tab at the top of the page, select versions to compare and click compare command.

Significant recent changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

Items 60 - 69

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments
60 Update TF Todd, Ken John Rhoads 2011.04.27 OPEN Previous history is available on this Wiki (see history tab).

The update will include PIB, SPD. Todd will ask the IHE Cochairs if the format must be changed to the new format or can be left as is. A format change to the TF is anticipated. This would place the boiler plate into volume 0. Manny to develop the essential elements of the Integration Statements and check to see if the requirement for PCD-01 from the DOR to the DOF is clearly written. Robert is leading a group addressing the issues with PAM ITI-30 and 31. Paul noted that web services will provide additional benefits such as security. The profile updates to HL7 v 2.6 will be folded in. Dec. 9, 2009: Change date to Dec. 18. John Garguilo noted Bikram’s observation about OBR field lengths. He recommended discussion and decision, perhaps using RE for those not used. Paul noted that there will be CPs coming out of coordination with Continua. Feb. 24, 2010: Updating TF is in progress, addressing non-controversial items. A draft of Volume 2 will be available shortly. Volume 3, delayed, will contain much of what was in Volume 2. CPs for Continua harmonization will be incorporated before the revised TF is issued for ballot. June 30, 2010: Change date to Sept. 15. September 22, 2010: Todd is working on TF Volume 3 which will include what was Volume 2 Appendix D. Manny to ask Todd for a potential date. April 6, 2010: Change due date to April 27 and note open ballot. John Rhoads noted that one more CP regarding OBX-18 may come in response to the ballot. Then a new TI version will be developed with items not yet ready for FT.

66 HL7 IHE-PCD Integration (Message) Profiles (i.e., Message Workbench [MWB] profiles) John Garguilo Al Engelbert, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders. 2011.05.31 OPEN Previous history is available on this Wiki (see history tab).

Gary volunteered to develop and maintain MWB profiles for three profiles, including tables (data type and others); initial versions are available and can be enhanced for future (cycles) use. Gary is maintaining MWB profiles and NIST bases/develops their message context validation files based on the MWB HL7 profiles. Volunteers are requested to help on the other profiles (ACM PCD-04 through 08). For ACM, Monroe indicated that only PCD-04 is currently stable. Gary will work on PCD-04 as well. Manny will talk with Nick regarding IDCO (for PCD-09). Gary noted that the MWB tool permits building the message, while that is not available in the NIST tools. John Garguilo noted that the MWB also provides the capability to execute (or simulate) a sending/receiving system for testing. NIST is working on building Test Agents to achieve similar functionality and John will provide updates as the Agents are written in software. September 22, 2010: John Garguilo will ask members to take responsibility for maintaining the profiles and keep the latest version on the ftp site. Companies will be able to constrain these further. Gary will lead an effort to coordinate this. Manny indicated that the MWB and Peter Rontey’s tutorial are posted on the ftp site. If any changes are required members should send Manny an email. Peter has limited time available because his responsibilities have changed. He may have room in an upcoming tutorial but is not offering tutorials regularly. April 6, 2010: John Garguilo suggested that this will be less of an issue with further development of NIST tools. John Garguilo will take the lead and attempt to gather the latest versions. He noted that Peter Rontey is unable to maintain the tool, but it may still be useful as a system to test against until the NIST tool provides that service. Al noted that another use for the MWB is to have a local system. John Rhoads suggested that it also provides useful reports. HL7 continues to recognize the MWB as a tool. Al asked if the NIST tool will produce an XML conformance profile. The NIST tools will accept XML profiles and might provide the conformance profile to use in the MWB. This will permit the MWB profiles to be updated in synch with NIST updates. John Rhoads suggested that GForge be used for version control. Date changed to May 31.

Items 70-79

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments

Items 80-89

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments

82 PCD OIDs & URNs Todd, John Rhoads John Garguilo 2010.09.22 OPEN For history see history tab.

There is an IHE PCD OID page. The IHE Domain Coordination Committee has had a very active discussion re. the management of OIDs within IHE. OIDs will be available when needed. Dec. 9, 2009: Robert reported no news; change to Feb. 4.August 31, 2010: John Garguilo edited action item 67 which needs to follow the management principles established for this action item - 82. See OID page: [[1]]

Items 90-99

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments

93 Managing Document Versions John Rhoads 2010.09.30 OPEN F2F: research the use of GForge. Feb. 24, 2010: John Rhoads to discuss with Steve Moore. June 30, 2010: John R has received approval to use GForge. Change date to Sept. 30, 2010.

QoS and a QoD (quality of data) issues need to be addressed within the alarm/alert communications

Monroe, Ken

2010.08.30 OPEN

Initiated F2F May 3, 2010 afternoon, item 2: (a) build the ability to identify these issues and (b) implement a response. An alert and/or log should be sent/noted when it is needed. May 26, 2010: Monroe has begun work. Initial proposal on how to proceed June 30. June 30, 2010: Change date.


Open source solution to archiving persistent data

Ken, Vaughan Zakian 2010.06.30 OPEN

Initiated F2F May 3, 2010: Ken and Vaughan will address an open source solution to archiving persistent data. May 26, 2010: Ken will contact Vaughan and report back the end of June.


Review 2010, Develop 2011 Test Cases

Manny John Garguilo 2010.09.25 OPEN

Initiated F2F May 3, 2010: Manny will schedule review of existing test cases and then extensions and new test cases [Complete]. Manny will add device identification and chain of data to the list of potential changes to testing [Comlete]. May 26, 2010: Summer, with a plan in a couple of weeks.June 30, 2010: Reviews have begun, changed due date to end of Aug. Tuesday sessions held [and completed] for DEC, PIV, ACM, and IDCO test case review. Test cases are being revised and reviewed a second time during first 3 weeks of Sept. 2010

Items 100-109

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments


Selection of WCTP by ACM

Monroe 2010.06.30 OPEN

Initiated F2F May 5, 2010: Todd will seek the MOU for ACM's WCTP.org issue. May 26, 2010: Monroe indicated that WCTP will be used and a CP will be prepared by the WG and submitted to the TC. Todd asked if this will be an option or the single approach. Monroe indicated that both this and SMTP should be accepted and WCTP will be promoted. Todd noted that wired vs. wireless needs to be addressed in the future. CP for ballot and TI available June 30. June 30, 2010: Manny to ping Steve Moore about SMTP and WCTP and learn if it is necessary to lose SMTP. Open Action Item for WCTP MOU (PC). Manny to contact Monroe re ballot for WCTP (TC). The question of whether this is a revised supplement or a CP is to be made by the ACM WG. Monroe and Ken will lead the effort.


Numeric Array (NA) data type

2010.06.02 OPEN

Initiated F2F May 6, 2010: Seek restoration of the Numeric Array (NA) data type. May 26, 2010: Wait to discuss with John Rhoads. Todd noted that HL7 v.7 should go to ballot shortly. The alarm trigger is included. NA could be included in v.2.8. Monroe asked if the TI version of ACM should assume positive ballot on v.7. This should be discussed at the next TC meeting. June 30, 2010: Close because John Garguilo believes this data type can be used.


Obtain all ADT support required for Connectathon, Showcase

Manny Cochairs August 4, 2010. OPEN June 30: Include PAM, PDQ, PEC.


August 30, 2010. OPEN

June 30: Possibly to include interim document.

108 Prioritize Escalated Alarms Monroe Pattillo ACM WG December 8, 2010 OPEN Wednesday, Oct. 20: ACM - AC will prioritize alarm and communication when messages are escalated. ACM will add a requirement to notify the person receiving an escalated message that the alarm has been escalated and has an associated delay from the initial alarm. The AC may make decisions on how to prioritize and escalate the message. This may have implications for the AM and perhaps AR.

109 Messages Without Patient Demographics Jeff Rinda Pump WG December 8, 2010 OPEN Wednesday, Oct. 20: Pumps (and other devices) sending device data in absence of patient demographics. (PIV initiated, to be discussed in Nov. 17th TC meeting)

Items 110-119

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments
110 WCM Attributes Paul Schluter Ken Fuchs December 8, 2010 OPEN Thursday, Oct. 21: Document ways of representing waveform attributes. Ken suggested similar action for PCD-02. To be discussed Nov 3rd TC meeting.
111 New Born Hearing Terminology Nitin Kunte Paul Schluter, John Garguilo January 5, 2011 OPEN Tuesday, Dec. 7: Discussion to include proposed new terminology in a systematic and consistent way via the RTM Integration Profile.
112 OPEN
113 OPEN
114 OPEN

115 OPEN
116 OPEN
117 OPEN
118 OPEN
119 OPEN

Items 120-129

Number Action Owner Participants Due Date Status Comments
120 OPEN
121 OPEN
122 OPEN
123 OPEN
124 OPEN

125 OPEN
126 OPEN
127 OPEN
128 OPEN
129 OPEN

Links to PCD TC Meetings

Go to most recent/past meetings or next meeting Category: PCD Meeting

Patient Care Device home