PCD Technical Committee Action Items

To see changes between current and last(or any earlier) versions of the action item list, click the history tab at the top of the page, select versions to compare and click compare command.

Significant recent changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

Items 60 - 69

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
60	Update TF	Todd, Ken	John Rhoads	2010.04.15	OPEN	Previous history is available on this Wiki (see history tab). The update will include PIB, SPD. Todd will ask the IHE Cochairs if the format must be changed to the new format or can be left as is. A format change to the TF is anticipated. This would place the boiler plate into volume 0. Manny to develop the essential elements of the Integration Statements and check to see if the requirement for PCD-01 from the DOR to the DOF is clearly written. Robert is leading a group addressing the issues with PAM ITI-30 and 31. Paul noted that web services will provide additional benefits such as security. The profile updates to HL7 v 2.6 will be folded in. Dec. 9, 2009: Change date to Dec. 18. John Garguilo noted Bikram’s observation about OBR field lengths. He recommended discussion and decision, perhaps using RE for those not used. Paul noted that there will be CPs coming out of coordination with Continua. Feb. 24, 2010: Updating TF is in progress, addressing non-controversial items. A draft of Volume 2 will be available shortly. Volume 3, delayed, will contain much of what was in Volume 2. CPs for Continua harmonization will be incorporated before the revised TF is issued for ballot.
66.1	Integration Profile Registration (w/ OID Defs)	John Garguilo	Al Engelbert, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders.	2010.03.31	OPEN	Previous history is available on this Wiki (see history tab). PCD likely won’t finalize the application until the TF has been updated and following the public comment period. Todd set up Google Group and Wiki Page to establish a baseline. The PCD will work with NIST for validation. It is anticipated that the other PCD transactions shall be registered after PCD-01 is complete. John Garguilo has requested that companies post their profiles at: PCD Year 3 Pre-Connectathon Testing FTP Site. Profiles will be maintained on ftp site. NIST can maintain these under the profile directories. Gary volunteered to develop and maintain MWB profiles for three profiles, including tables (data type and others) are available for future use. Volunteers were requested for the other profiles (ACM PCD-04 through 08). Monroe indicated that only PCD-04 would be stable now. Gary will pick up PCD-04 as well. Manny will talk with Nick regarding IDCO.Gary is maintaining MWB profiles and NIST is developing their profiles. Gary noted that the MWB permits building the message, while that is not available in the NIST tools. John Garguilo noted that the MWB also provides a receiving system for testing.
66.2	Implementation Conformance Profile Support	John Garguilo	Al Engelbert, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders.	2010.03.31	OPEN	Previous history is available on this Wiki (see history tab). PCD likely won’t finalize the application until the TF has been updated and following the public comment period. Todd set up Google Group and Wiki Page to establish a baseline. The PCD will work with NIST for validation. It is anticipated that the other PCD transactions shall be registered after PCD-01 is complete. John Garguilo has requested that companies post their profiles at: PCD Year 3 Pre-Connectathon Testing FTP Site. Profiles will be maintained on ftp site. NIST can maintain these under the profile directories. Gary volunteered to develop and maintain MWB profiles for three profiles, including tables (data type and others) are available for future use. Volunteers were requested for the other profiles (ACM PCD-04 through 08). Monroe indicated that only PCD-04 would be stable now. Gary will pick up PCD-04 as well. Manny will talk with Nick regarding IDCO.Gary is maintaining MWB profiles and NIST is developing their profiles. Gary noted that the MWB permits building the message, while that is not available in the NIST tools. John Garguilo noted that the MWB also provides a receiving system for testing.

Items 70-79

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
77	Preparing a Proposal to HL7 for Pharmacy WG (new name)	Gary Meyer	Jeff Rinda, Al Engelbert	2010.03.31	OPEN	Jeff noted this is not a critical issue, but the pharmacy group needs to address the issue. Gary is monitoring the Pharmacy WG. They are focused on community practice. Gary suggested that about a third of this work will be useful for institutional practice. Ruth noted that HITSP is working on the ordering process. NCPCP is working on an HL7 2.5 messaging process. This work is US focused and may become an issue internationally. They may not be interested in addressing this in this cycle (Atlanta the week of Sept. 21). Dec. 9, 2009: Change date to Feb. 20.

Items 80-89

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
82	PCD OIDs & URNs	Todd, John Rhoads		2010.02.04	OPEN	For history see history tab. There is an IHE PCD OID page. The IHE Domain Coordination Committee has had a very active discussion re. the management of OIDs within IHE. OIDs will be available when needed.Dec. 9, 2009: Robert reported no news; change to Feb. 4.
83	MOUs	Sandy	Ken	2010.05.03	OPEN	Follow up MOU status with CIMIT, ASTM. Ken reported that Julian presented this to the ASTM. John Garguilo reported they had a meeting with the FDA and updated them on NIST tools and their work with PCD.
87	IDCO	Nick		2009.07.01	CLOSED	For history see history tab and previous meetings. Nick Steblay reviewed the public comments received on IDCO. Use case clarification/modification will be addressed in response to Manny’s comment suggesting that a flag be set to indicate clinician review (validation). With regard to identification of the pacemaker, there is a unique identifier for the device that includes vendor, model and in some instances the serial number. Paul noted that the interrogator should be identified for traceability, and use EUI-64. Nick responded that device vendors do not send this now, and this would be an issue. It was agreed that this will be resolved in the future. John Garguilo indicated the WG is currently addressing RTM issues. IDCO leadership will be invited to report at the next TC meeting.
89	Verify process for “public comment” period	Todd, John Rhoads		2010.03.31	OPEN	For history see history tab. Address common procedure for all domains where the domain keeps the submitting organization informed of progress. Verify process for “public comment” period, esp. for CPs; verify it is properly and appropriately applied to the RTM updates; publish to TC (esp. CP editors Jeff Rinda & Rugh Berge). John Rhoads has reviewed the ITI procedure and provided a modified version for the PCD. Substantial discussion followed and John will update the diagram. Paul asked if there is an appeal process to resolve conflicts. Todd will research the appeal process. 2010.03.17 Ioana has submitted a revision of the process for consideration.

Items 90-99

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
92	Grouped Actors		Manny	2010.05.03	OPEN	F2F: Did Kudu registration permit signing up for DOR as a grouped actor? Dec. 9, 2009: Pending discussion at DCC.
93	Managing Document Versions	John Rhoads		2010.03.31	OPEN	F2F: research the use of GForge. Feb. 24, 2010: John Rhoads to discuss with Steve Moore.
94	TF Gaps to Fill	Ruth		2009 Nov. 18	OPEN	Ruth will check status of ITI HL7 ACK text for PCD-03. Feb. 24, 2010: Manny to ask Ruth for update.
96	Add ITI-31 (PAM PCD) to the TF	Robert, John Rhoads		2010.03.31	OPEN	November 18: Robert raised the need for ITI-31 for PCD; this will be added to the TF. Robert working on CP;
97	QoS and a QoD (quality of data) issues need to be addressed within the alarm/alert communications	Monroe, Ken		2010.06.30	OPEN	Initiated F2F May 3, 2010 afternoon, item 2: (a) build the ability to identify these issues and (b) implement a response. An alert and/or log should be sent/noted when it is needed. May 26, 2010: Monroe has begun work. Initial proposal on how to proceed June 30.
98	Open source solution to archiving persistent data	Ken, Vaughan Zakian		2010.06.30	OPEN	Initiated F2F May 3, 2010: Ken and Vaughan will address an open source solution to archiving persistent data. May 26, 2010: Ken will contact Vaughan and report back the end of June.
99	Review 2010, Develop 2011 Test Cases	Manny	John Garguilo	2010.06.16	OPEN	Initiated F2F May 3, 2010: Manny will schedule review of existing test cases and then extensions and new test cases. Manny will add device identification and chain of data to the list of potential changes to testing. May 26, 2010: Summer, with a plan in a couple of weeks.

Items 100-109

Number	Action	Due Date	Status
100	CPs: PCD-01, PCD-02, ACM, ACK, ITI-31, RTM, other	2009.10.05	OPEN
101	Selection of WCTP by ACM	2009 Dec. 2	OPEN
102	Numeric Array (NA) data type	2009.07.01	OPEN
103	DPI/ICE-PAC Project	2009.07.01	OPEN
104	CDA (HL 7 v.3)	2009.07.01	OPEN
105		2009.07.01	OPEN
106		2009.07.01	OPEN
107		2009.07.01	OPEN
108		2009.07.01	OPEN
109		2009.07.01	OPEN

Items 110-119

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
110					OPEN
111					OPEN
112					OPEN
113					OPEN
114					OPEN
115					OPEN
116					OPEN
117					OPEN
118					OPEN
119					OPEN

Links to PCD TC Meetings

Go to most recent/past meetings or next meeting Category: PCD Meeting

Patient Care Device home