Difference between revisions of "PCD Technical Committee Action Items"

Revision as of 23:04, 24 February 2010

To see changes between current and last(or any earlier) versions of the action item list, click the history tab at the top of the page, select versions to compare and click compare command.

Action items updated September 8, 2009

Significant recent changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

Items 60 - 69

Number

Action

Owner

Participants

Due Date

Status

Comments

60

Update TF

Todd, Ken

John Rhoads

2009.12.18

OPEN

Previous history is available on this Wiki (see history tab).

The update will include PIB, SPD. Ken has cleaned up Volume 1 in preparation for updating it. Todd will ask the IHE Cochairs if the format must be changed to the new format or can be left as is. John Rhoads will prepare the CP for the TF. A format change to the TF is anticipated. This would place the boiler plate into volume 0. Manny to develop the essential elements of the Integration Statements and check to see if the requirement for PCD-01 from the DOR to the DOF is clearly written. Robert is leading a group addressing the issues with PAM ITI-30 and 31. Paul noted that web services will provide additional benefits such as security.

Oct. 28, 2009: Ken has updated volume 1. John Rhoads (volume 2) is nearing completion. Todd is working on volume 3. The profile updates to HL7 v 2.6 will be folded in. Dec. 9, 2009: Change date to Dec. 18. John Garguilo noted Bikram’s observation about OBR field lengths. He recommended discussion and decision, perhaps using RE for those not used. Paul noted that there will be CPs coming out of coordination with Continua. "

66

Prepare profiles for registration.

John Garguilo

Al Engelbert, Todd Cooper, Robert Flanders.

2010.02.01

OPEN

Previous history is available on this Wiki (see history tab).

PCD likely won’t finalize the application until the TF has been updated and following the public comment period. Todd set up Google Group and Wiki Page to establish a baseline. The PCD will work with NIST for validation. It is anticipated that the other PCD transactions shall be registered after PCD-01 is complete. John Garguilo has requested that companies post their profiles at: PCD Year 3 Pre-Connectathon Testing FTP Site. Profiles will be maintained on ftp site. NIST can maintain these under the profile directories. Gary volunteered to develop and maintain MWB profiles for three profiles, including tables (data type and others) are available for future use. Volunteers were requested for the other profiles (ACM PCD-04 through 08). Monroe indicated that only PCD-04 would be stable now. Gary will pick up PCD-04 as well. Manny will talk with Nick regarding IDCO.

Items 70-79

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
77	Preparing a Proposal to HL7 for Pharmacy WG (new name)	Gary Meyer	Jeff Rinda, Al Engelbert	2010.02.20	OPEN	Jeff noted this is not a critical issue, but the pharmacy group needs to address the issue. Gary is monitoring the Pharmacy WG. They are focused on community practice. Gary suggested that about a third of this work will be useful for institutional practice. Ruth noted that HITSP is working on the ordering process. NCPCP is working on an HL7 2.5 messaging process. This work is US focused and may become an issue internationally. They may not be interested in addressing this in this cycle (Atlanta the week of Sept. 21). Dec. 9, 2009: Change date to Feb. 20.

Items 80-89

Number	Action	Owner	Due Date	Status	Comments
82	OID for PCD	Todd, John Rhoads	2010.02.04	OPEN	For history see history tab. There is an IHE PCD OID page. The IHE Domain Coordination Committee has had a very active discussion re. the management of OIDs within IHE. OIDs will be available when needed.Dec. 9, 2009: Robert reported no news; change to Feb. 4.
83	MOUs	Sandy	2009.02.04	OPEN	Follow up MOU status with CIMIT, ASTM. Ken reported that Julian presented this to the ASTM. John Garguilo reported they had a meeting with the FDA and updated them on NIST tools and their work with PCD.
87	IDCO	Nick	2009.07.01	OPEN	For history see history tab and previous meetings. Nick Steblay reviewed the public comments received on IDCO. Use case clarification/modification will be addressed in response to Manny’s comment suggesting that a flag be set to indicate clinician review (validation). With regard to identification of the pacemaker, there is a unique identifier for the device that includes vendor, model and in some instances the serial number. Paul noted that the interrogator should be identified for traceability, and use EUI-64. Nick responded that device vendors do not send this now, and this would be an issue. It was agreed that this will be resolved in the future.
89	Verify process for “public comment” period	Todd, John Rhoads	2010.01.04	OPEN	For history see history tab. Verify process for “public comment” period, esp. for CPs; verify it is properly and appropriately applied to the RTM updates; publish to TC (esp. CP editors Jeff Rinda & Rugh Berge). John Rhoads has reviewed the ITI procedure and provided a modified version for the PCD. Substantial discussion followed and John will update the diagram. Paul asked if there is an appeal process to resolve conflicts. Todd will research the appeal process.

Items 90-99

Number	Action	Owner	Participants	Due Date	Status	Comments
92	Grouped Actors		Manny	2010.01.27	OPEN	F2F: Did Kudu registration permit signing up for DOR as a grouped actor? Dec. 9, 2009: Pending discussion at DCC. Change date to end of Jan.
93	Managing Document Versions	John Rhoads		2009.11.18	OPEN	F2F: research the use of GForge.
94	TF Gaps to Fill	Ruth		2009 Nov. 18	OPEN	Ruth will check status of ITI HL7 ACK text for PCD-03. Dec. 9, 2009: Manny to ask Ruth to update.
96	Add ITI-31 (PAM PCD) to the TF	Robert, John Rhoads		2010.01.27	OPEN	November 18: Robert raised the need for ITI-31 for PCD; this will be added to the TF. Robert working on CP; change date to end of Jan.
97				2009.07.01	OPEN
98				2009.07.01	OPEN
99				2009.07.01	OPEN

Items 100-109

Number	Due Date	Status
100	2009.10.05	OPEN
101	2009 Dec. 2	OPEN
102	2009.07.01	OPEN
103	2009.07.01	OPEN
104	2009.07.01	OPEN
105	2009.07.01	OPEN
106	2009.07.01	OPEN
107	2009.07.01	OPEN
108	2009.07.01	OPEN
109	2009.07.01	OPEN

Links to PCD TC Meetings

Go to most recent/past meetings or next meeting Category: PCD Meeting

Patient Care Device home

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 | '''<Due Date>'''  | 2010.02.04
 | '''<Status>''' |OPEN
-| '''<Comments>:'''  | Manny to follow up on obtaining and OID.  Todd put up a Wiki page to describe managing the OID. John Rhoads will flesh that out. Change date to next meeting. John will report on current OID management discussions within the IHE DCC and update the IHE PCD OID page accordingly. The IHE Domain Coordination Committee has had a very active discussion re. the management of OIDs within IHE. This is very positive re. having a coordinated mangagement process and method (e.g., repository) in the near future.
+| '''<Comments>:'''  | For history see history tab.
-October 28, 2009: OIDs will be available when needed.'''Dec. 9, 2009: Robert reported no news; change to Feb. 4.'''
+There is an IHE PCD OID page. The IHE Domain Coordination Committee has had a very active discussion re. the management of OIDs within IHE. OIDs will be available when needed.'''Dec. 9, 2009: Robert reported no news; change to Feb. 4.'''
 |-
@@ Line 101: / Line 102: @@
 | '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.02.04
 | '''<Status>''' |OPEN
-| '''<Comments>:'''  | Follow up MOU status with CIMIT, ASTM. It is on the ASTM executive meeting agenda next week. Ken reported that Julian presented this to the ASTM. The outcome has not been reported. Ken will follow-up with Julian Goldman to determine the current status.
+| '''<Comments>:'''  | Follow up MOU status with CIMIT, ASTM.  Ken reported that Julian presented this to the ASTM. John Garguilo reported they had a meeting with the FDA and updated them on NIST tools and their work with PCD.
-October 28, 2009: No word from CIMIT. John Garguilo reported they had a meeting with the FDA and updated them on NIST tools and their work with PCD.'''Dec. 9, 2009: Change date to Feb. 4. Julian plans to have a conference Jan. 25-27; the date is tentative. Ken will contact Sandy Weininger. '''
 |-
@@ Line 111: / Line 111: @@
 | '''<Due Date>'''  | 2009.07.01
 | '''<Status>''' |OPEN
-| '''<Comments>:'''  | '''For history see previous meeting. Nick Steblay reviewed the public comments received on IDCO. Use case clarification/modification will be addressed in response to Manny’s comment suggesting that a flag be set to indicate clinician review (validation). This will be done now. They will also review the comment regarding clarification of the translator’s role, and may remove it from discussion. With regard to identification of the pacemaker, there is a unique identifier for the device that includes vendor, model and in some instances the serial number. Paul noted that the interrogator should be identified for traceability, and use EUI-64. Nick responded that device vendors do not send this now, and this would be an issue. It was agreed that this will be resolved in the future. '''
+| '''<Comments>:'''  | For history see history tab and previous meetings.
+'''Nick Steblay reviewed the public comments received on IDCO. Use case clarification/modification will be addressed in response to Manny’s comment suggesting that a flag be set to indicate clinician review (validation). With regard to identification of the pacemaker, there is a unique identifier for the device that includes vendor, model and in some instances the serial number. Paul noted that the interrogator should be identified for traceability, and use EUI-64. Nick responded that device vendors do not send this now, and this would be an issue. It was agreed that this will be resolved in the future. '''
 |-
@@ Line 120: / Line 122: @@
 | '''<Due Date>'''  | 2010.01.04
 | '''<Status>''' |OPEN
-| '''<Comments>:'''  | Verify process for “public comment” period, esp. for CPs; verify it is properly and appropriately applied to the RTM updates; publish to TC (esp. CP editors Jeff Rinda & Rugh Berge). Also in Item 60: CPs will continue to be received as we go forward to the Connectathon. A number have been received. Paul noted that coordination with Continua will result in additional items. Todd requested that CPs be submitted now as the TF is reviewed. CPs addressing a WG profile will first be reviewed by the WG and then be brought to the TC. John Rhoads has reviewed the ITI procedure and provided a modified version for the PCD. Substantial discussion followed and John will update the diagram. Paul asked if there is an appeal process to resolve conflicts. Todd will research the appeal process.
+| '''<Comments>:'''  | For history see history tab.
-'''Dec. 9, 2009: Change to John Rhoads, Ioana. Change date to Jan. 4.'''
+Verify process for “public comment” period, esp. for CPs; verify it is properly and appropriately applied to the RTM updates; publish to TC (esp. CP editors Jeff Rinda & Rugh Berge). John Rhoads has reviewed the ITI procedure and provided a modified version for the PCD. Substantial discussion followed and John will update the diagram. Paul asked if there is an appeal process to resolve conflicts. Todd will research the appeal process.
 |}